Literature DB >> 24225930

Behavioral responses ofSpodoptera littoralis males to sex pheromone components and virgin females in wind tunnel.

C Quero1, P Lucas, M Renou, A Guerrero.   

Abstract

The major component of the sex pheromone of femaleSpodoptera littoralis, (Z,E)-9,11-tetradecadienyl acetate (1), elicited all steps of the male behavioral sequence, i.e., wing fanning and taking flight, oriented upwind flight and arrival to the middle of the tunnel, close approach and contact with the source. The activity was equivalent to that elicited by virgin females. In the range of doses tested, the dosage of1 had no significant effect on the number of source contacts. Male response was significantly affected by light intensity, being optimum at 3 lux. Activity of the minor components (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate (2), (E)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (3), tetradecyl acetate (4), (Z)-11-tetradecenyl acetate (5), and (Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadienyl acetate (6) was significantly lower than that of the major component when assayed individually. In multicomponent blends compound4 appeared to strongly decrease the number of males arrested at the source, the effect being particularly important when compound5 was present in the blend. Results of single sensillum experiments confirmed the existence of two main physiologically distinct sensillar types. The most common type of sensilla contained a neuron that responded specifically to compound1. A second type of sensilla, located laterally on the ventral sensory surface, contained two receptor neurons responding to compound6 and to (Z)-9-tetradecenol. Among short sensilla, one hair responded to compound4 and could represent a minor sensillar type. No sensory neuron was found to detect the other minor pheromone compounds2, 3, and5.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 24225930     DOI: 10.1007/BF02027947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  8 in total

1.  Pheromone components and active spaces: what do moths smell and where do they smell it?

Authors:  C E Linn; M G Campbell; W L Roelofs
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-08-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Disruption of male spruce budworm orientation to calling females in a wind tunnel by synthetic pheromone.

Authors:  C J Sanders
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Sex pheromone components of the turnip moth,Agrotis segetum : Chemical identification, electrophysiological evaluation and behavioral activity.

Authors:  C Löfstedt; J N Van Der Pers; J Lofqvist; B S Lanne; M Appelgren; G Bergström; B Thelin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Sex pheromones of two noctuid moths.

Authors:  B F Nesbitt; P S Beevor; R A Cole; R Lester; R G Poppi
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1973-08-15

5.  Sex pheromone of the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis.

Authors:  Y Tamaki; T Yushima
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 2.354

6.  Behavioral responses of male turnip moths,Agrotis segetum, to sex pheromone in a flight tunnel and in the field.

Authors:  C Löfstedt; C E Linn; J Löfqvist
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Sex pheromone biosynthetic pathway in Spodoptera littoralis and its activation by a neurohormone.

Authors:  T Martinez; G Fabriás; F Camps
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-01-25       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Responses of male codling moths (Laspeyresia pomonella) to codlemone and other alcohols in a wind tunnel.

Authors:  R Preiss; E Priesner
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.626

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Short-term peripheral sensitization by brief exposure to pheromone components in Spodoptera littoralis.

Authors:  S López; A Guerrero; M J Bleda; C Quero
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Antennal carboxylesterases in a moth, structural and functional diversity.

Authors:  Nicolas Durand; Thomas Chertemps; Martine Maïbèche-Coisne
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2012-05-01

3.  Characterization of an antennal carboxylesterase from the pest moth Spodoptera littoralis degrading a host plant odorant.

Authors:  Nicolas Durand; Gerard Carot-Sans; Thomas Chertemps; Françoise Bozzolan; Virginie Party; Michel Renou; Stéphane Debernard; Gloria Rosell; Martine Maïbèche-Coisne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A general odorant background affects the coding of pheromone stimulus intermittency in specialist olfactory receptor neurones.

Authors:  Angela Rouyar; Virginie Party; Janez Prešern; Andrej Blejec; Michel Renou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Degradation of pheromone and plant volatile components by a same odorant-degrading enzyme in the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis.

Authors:  Nicolas Durand; Gerard Carot-Sans; Françoise Bozzolan; Gloria Rosell; David Siaussat; Stéphane Debernard; Thomas Chertemps; Martine Maïbèche-Coisne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A novel lineage of candidate pheromone receptors for sex communication in moths.

Authors:  Lucie Bastin-Héline; Arthur de Fouchier; Song Cao; Fotini Koutroumpa; Gabriela Caballero-Vidal; Stefania Robakiewicz; Christelle Monsempes; Marie-Christine François; Tatiana Ribeyre; Annick Maria; Thomas Chertemps; Anne de Cian; William B Walker; Guirong Wang; Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly; Nicolas Montagné
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Inhibitory effect of thymol on pheromone-mediated attraction in two pest moth species.

Authors:  Sergio López; Aroa Domínguez; Ángel Guerrero; Carmen Quero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Mimicking insect communication: release and detection of pheromone, biosynthesized by an alcohol acetyl transferase immobilized in a microreactor.

Authors:  Lourdes Muñoz; Nikolay Dimov; Gerard Carot-Sans; Wojciech P Bula; Angel Guerrero; Han J G E Gardeniers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Changes in odor background affect the locomotory response to pheromone in moths.

Authors:  Virginie Party; Christophe Hanot; Daniela Schmidt Büsser; Didier Rochat; Michel Renou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pheromone Receptor Knock-Out Affects Pheromone Detection and Brain Structure in a Moth.

Authors:  Fotini Koutroumpa; Christelle Monsempès; Sylvia Anton; Marie-Christine François; Nicolas Montagné; Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-02-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.