Literature DB >> 24275827

Cathodal tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex diminishes choice-induced preference change.

Flavia Mengarelli1, Silvia Spoglianti2, Alessio Avenanti3, Giuseppe di Pellegrino1.   

Abstract

In everyday life, people often find themselves facing difficult decisions between options that are equally attractive. Cognitive dissonance theory states that after making a difficult choice between 2 equally preferred options, individuals no longer find the alternatives similarly desirable. Rather, they often change their existing preferences to align more closely with the choice they have just made. Despite the relevance of cognitive dissonance in modulating behavior, little is known about the brain processes crucially involved in choice-induced preference change. In the present study, we applied cathodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) with the aim of downregulating the activity of the left or the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during a revised version of Brehm's (in 1956. Post-decision changes in the desirability of alternatives. J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 52:384-389) free-choice paradigm. We found that cathodal tDCS over the left, but not over the right, DLPFC caused a reduction of the typical behavior-induced preference change relative to sham stimulation. Our findings highlight the role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive dissonance and provide evidence that left DLPFC plays a necessary role in the implementation of choice-induced preference change.
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitude change; cognitive control; decision-making; prefrontal cortex; transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24275827     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  13 in total

1.  Hard Decisions Shape the Neural Coding of Preferences.

Authors:  Katharina Voigt; Carsten Murawski; Sebastian Speer; Stefan Bode
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Methods for specific electrode resistance measurement during transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Asif Rahman; Chris Sarantos; Dennis Q Truong; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 3.  The uncertain outcome of prefrontal tDCS.

Authors:  Sara Tremblay; Jean-François Lepage; Alex Latulipe-Loiselle; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Cognitive dissonance resolution is related to episodic memory.

Authors:  Moti Salti; Imen El Karoui; Mathurin Maillet; Lionel Naccache
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A model for visual memory encoding.

Authors:  Rodolphe Nenert; Jane B Allendorfer; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Stimulus-category competition, inhibition, and affective devaluation: a novel account of the uncanny valley.

Authors:  Anne E Ferrey; Tyler J Burleigh; Mark J Fenske
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-03-13

7.  Dorsal striatal dopamine, food preference and health perception in humans.

Authors:  Deanna L Wallace; Esther Aarts; Linh C Dang; Stephanie M Greer; William J Jagust; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Alteration of Political Belief by Non-invasive Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Caroline Chawke; Ryota Kanai
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Dissonance (Revised): An EEG Study.

Authors:  Marco Colosio; Anna Shestakova; Vadim V Nikulin; Evgeny Blagovechtchenski; Vasily Klucharev
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Effective brain connectivity at rest is associated with choice-induced preference formation.

Authors:  Katharina Voigt; Carsten Murawski; Sebastian Speer; Stefan Bode
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.