Literature DB >> 30530856

Hard Decisions Shape the Neural Coding of Preferences.

Katharina Voigt1, Carsten Murawski2, Sebastian Speer1,3, Stefan Bode4,5.   

Abstract

Hard decisions between equally valued alternatives can result in preference changes, meaning that subsequent valuations for chosen items increase and decrease for rejected items. Previous research suggests that this phenomenon is a consequence of cognitive dissonance reduction after the decision, induced by the mismatch between initial preferences and decision outcomes. In contrast, this functional magnetic resonance imaging and eye-tracking study with male and female human participants found that preferences are already updated online during the process of decision-making. Preference changes were predicted from activity in left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and precuneus while making hard decisions. Fixation durations during this phase predicted both choice outcomes and subsequent preference changes. These preference adjustments became behaviorally relevant only for choices that were remembered and were in turn associated with hippocampus activity. Our results suggest that preferences evolve dynamically as decisions arise, potentially as a mechanism to prevent stalemate situations in underdetermined decision scenarios.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Most theories of decision-making assume that we always choose the best option available, based on a set of stable preferences. However, what happens for hard decisions when the available options are preferred equally? We show that in such stalemate situations, decision-makers adjust their preferences dynamically during the process of decision-making, and these preference adjustments are predicted by a left prefrontal-parietal network. We also show that eye movements during decision-making are predictive of the magnitude of the upcoming value change. Our results suggest that preferences are dynamic, adjusted every time a hard decision is made, prompting a re-evaluation of existing frameworks of decision-making.
Copyright © 2019 the authors 0270-6474/19/390718-09$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  choice-induced preference change; decision-making; fMRI; precuneus; preference formation; prefrontal cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30530856      PMCID: PMC6343649          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1681-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

1.  The neural correlates of intentional and incidental self processing.

Authors:  Tilo T J Kircher; M Brammer; Edward Bullmore; A Simmons; M Bartels; Anthony S David
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change.

Authors:  Keise Izuma; Madoka Matsumoto; Kou Murayama; Kazuyuki Samejima; Norihiro Sadato; Kenji Matsumoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The neural basis of rationalization: cognitive dissonance reduction during decision-making.

Authors:  Johanna M Jarcho; Elliot T Berkman; Matthew D Lieberman
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 4.  The hippocampus and memory: insights from spatial processing.

Authors:  Chris M Bird; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Predicting free choices for abstract intentions.

Authors:  Chun Siong Soon; Anna Hanxi He; Stefan Bode; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Paying attention to attention in recognition memory: insights from models and electrophysiology.

Authors:  Chad Dubé; Lisa Payne; Robert Sekuler; Caren M Rotello
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-10-01

8.  Changing value through cued approach: an automatic mechanism of behavior change.

Authors:  Tom Schonberg; Akram Bakkour; Ashleigh M Hover; Jeanette A Mumford; Lakshya Nagar; Jacob Perez; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Choice-induced preference change in the free-choice paradigm: a critical methodological review.

Authors:  Keise Izuma; Kou Murayama
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-07

Review 10.  Goals and habits in the brain.

Authors:  Ray J Dolan; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  8 in total

1.  Trading mental effort for confidence in the metacognitive control of value-based decision-making.

Authors:  Douglas G Lee; Jean Daunizeau
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Choosing what we like vs liking what we choose: How choice-induced preference change might actually be instrumental to decision-making.

Authors:  Douglas Lee; Jean Daunizeau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The effect of emotion regulation on risk-taking and decision-related activity in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Carmen Morawetz; Peter N C Mohr; Hauke R Heekeren; Stefan Bode
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Choosing increases the value of non-instrumental information.

Authors:  Matthew Jiwa; Patrick S Cooper; Trevor T-J Chong; Stefan Bode
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Believing and Beliefs-Neurophysiological Underpinnings.

Authors:  Rüdiger J Seitz
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Effective brain connectivity at rest is associated with choice-induced preference formation.

Authors:  Katharina Voigt; Carsten Murawski; Sebastian Speer; Stefan Bode
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  How decisions and the desire for coherency shape subjective preferences over time.

Authors:  Adam N Hornsby; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-03-26

8.  Moral judgements of fairness-related actions are flexibly updated to account for contextual information.

Authors:  Milan Andrejević; Daniel Feuerriegel; William Turner; Simon Laham; Stefan Bode
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.