Literature DB >> 24275385

Genotoxic risk in rubber manufacturing industry: a systematic review.

Claudia Bolognesi1, Angelo Moretto2.   

Abstract

A large body of evidence from epidemiological studies among workers employed in the rubber manufacturing industry has indicated a significant excess cancer risk in a variety of sites. The International Agency for Research on Cancer has recently classified the "Occupational exposures in the rubber-manufacturing industry" as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1). A genotoxic mechanism for the increased cancer risk was suggested on the basis of the evidence from the scientific literature. Exposure assessment studies have shown that workers in the rubber manufacturing industry may be exposed to different airborne carcinogenic and/or genotoxic chemicals, such as certain aromatic amines, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, N-nitrosamines, although the available information does not allow to establish a causal association of cancer or genotoxic risk with particular substances/classes of chemicals or specific jobs. The aim of this paper is to critically evaluate, by conducting a systematic review, the available biomonitoring studies using genotoxicity biomarkers in rubber manufacturing industry. This systematic review suggests that a genotoxic hazard may still be present in certain rubber manufacturing industries. A quantitative risk assessment needs further studies addressing the different, processes and chemicals in the rubber manufacturing industries.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA adducts; Genotoxicity; Mutagenicity; Occupational exposure; Rubber manufacturing industry; Tire manufacturing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24275385     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.11.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  5 in total

Review 1.  Hepatocellular carcinoma and the risk of occupational exposure.

Authors:  Venerando Rapisarda; Carla Loreto; Michele Malaguarnera; Annalisa Ardiri; Maria Proiti; Giuseppe Rigano; Evelise Frazzetto; Maria Irene Ruggeri; Giulia Malaguarnera; Nicoletta Bertino; Mariano Malaguarnera; Vito Emanuele Catania; Isidoro Di Carlo; Adriana Toro; Emanuele Bertino; Dario Mangano; Gaetano Bertino
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-05-08

Review 2.  Molecular mechanisms underlying the action of carcinogens in gastric cancer with a glimpse into targeted therapy.

Authors:  Elham Patrad; Solmaz Khalighfard; Taghi Amiriani; Vahid Khori; Ali Mohammad Alizadeh
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 7.051

Review 3.  Non‑infective occupational risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma: A review (Review).

Authors:  Caterina Ledda; Carla Loreto; Christian Zammit; Andrea Marconi; Lucrezia Fago; Serena Matera; Valentina Costanzo; Giovanni Fuccio Sanzà; Stefano Palmucci; Margherita Ferrante; Chiara Costa; Concettina Fenga; Antonio Biondi; Cristoforo Pomara; Venerando Rapisarda
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.952

4.  Solid-Phase Spectrophotometric Analysis of 1-Naphthol Using Silica Functionalized with m-Diazophenylarsonic Acid.

Authors:  Nataliya Zaitseva; Sergei Alekseev; Vladimir Zaitsev; Viktoria Raks
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.703

5.  Exposure to particle debris generated from passenger and truck tires induces different genotoxicity and inflammatory responses in the RAW 264.7 cell line.

Authors:  Anna Poma; Giulia Vecchiotti; Sabrina Colafarina; Osvaldo Zarivi; Lorenzo Arrizza; Piero Di Carlo; Alessandra Di Cola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.