Literature DB >> 24274784

The Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score predicts biochemical recurrence in intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose escalation or low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy.

Vimal Krishnan1, Guila Delouya, Jean-Paul Bahary, Sandra Larrivée, Daniel Taussky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the prognostic value of the University of California, San Francisco Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score to predict biochemical failure (bF) after various doses of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or permanent seed low-dose rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy (PB). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 345 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with PSA levels of 10-20 ng/mL and/or Gleason 7 including 244 EBRT patients (70.2-79.2 Gy) and 101 patients treated with LDR PB. The minimum follow-up was 3 years. No patient received primary androgen-deprivation therapy. bF was defined according to the Phoenix definition. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the differences between CAPRA groups.
RESULTS: The overall bF rate was 13% (45/345). The CAPRA score, as a continuous variable, was statistically significant in multivariate analysis for predicting bF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.72, P = 0.006). There was a trend for a lower bF rate in patients treated with LDR PB when compared with those treated by EBRT ≤ 74 Gy (HR 0.234, 95% CI 0.05-1.03, P = 0.055) in multivariate analysis. In the subgroup of patients with a CAPRA score of 3-5, CAPRA remained predictive of bF as a continuous variable (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.01-2.27, P = 0.047) in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: The CAPRA score is useful for predicting biochemical recurrence in patients treated for intermediate-risk prostate cancer with EBRT or LDR PB. It could help in treatment decisions.
© 2013 The Authors. BJU International © 2013 BJU International.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAPRA; brachytherapy; external beam radiotherapy; predictive models; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24274784     DOI: 10.1111/bju.12587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  5 in total

1.  Three linked nomograms for predicting biochemical failure in prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Jose López-Torrecilla; Anna Boladeras; María Angeles Cabeza; Almudena Zapatero; Josep Jove; Luis M Esteban; Ivan Henriquez; Manuel Casaña; Carmen González-San Segundo; Antonio Gómez-Caamaño; Jose Luis Mengual; Asunción Hervás; Julia Luisa Muñoz; Gerardo Sanz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Clinical risk-stratification for prostate cancer: Where are we, and where do we need to go?

Authors:  Matthew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  An appraisal of analytical tools used in predicting clinical outcomes following radiation therapy treatment of men with prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elspeth Raymond; Michael E O'Callaghan; Jared Campbell; Andrew D Vincent; Kerri Beckmann; David Roder; Sue Evans; John McNeil; Jeremy Millar; John Zalcberg; Martin Borg; Kim Moretti
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Downregulation of serum CXCL4L1 predicts progression and poor prognosis in prostate cancer patients treated by radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Mo Zhang; Johnny Guan; Yun-Long Huo; Yong-Sheng Song; Li-Zhu Chen
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  The CAPRA score versus sub-types of minimal residual disease to predict biochemical failure after external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nigel P Murray; Socrates Aedo; Cynthia Fuentealba; Eduardo Reyes; Anibal Salazar; Eghon Guzman; Shenda Orrego
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2020-05-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.