Literature DB >> 24274375

Over-reporting bias and the modified Stroop effect in Operation Enduring and Iraqi Freedom veterans with and without PTSD.

Joseph I Constans1, Timothy A Kimbrell2, John T Nanney1, Brian P Marx3, Susan Jegley4, Jeffrey M Pyne4.   

Abstract

The current study investigated in a sample of Operation Enduring and Iraqi Freedom (OEF/OIF) veterans how a symptom overreporting response style might influence the association between PTSD diagnostic status and color-naming response latency for trauma-related stimuli during the Modified Stroop Task (i.e., the Modified Stroop Task effect, MST effect). It was hypothesized that, if an overreporting response style reflected feigning or exaggerating PTSD symptoms, an attenuated MST effect would be expected in overreporters with PTSD as compared with PTSD-diagnosed veterans without an overreporting style. If, however, overreporting stemmed from high levels of distress, the MST effect might be greater in overreporters compared with those with a neutral response style. The results showed that veterans with PTSD and an overreporting response style demonstrated an augmented MST effect in comparison with those with a more neutral style of response. Overreporters also reported greater levels of psychopathology, including markedly elevated reports of dissociative experiences. We suggest that dissociation-prone overreporters may misattribute emotional distress to combat experiences leading to the enhanced MST effect. Other possible explanations for these results are also discussed. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24274375      PMCID: PMC4153371          DOI: 10.1037/a0035100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol        ISSN: 0021-843X


  32 in total

1.  Compensation-seeking and extreme exaggeration of psychopathology among combat veterans evaluated for posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  P B Gold; B C Frueh
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.254

2.  Is the emotional Stroop paradigm sensitive to malingering? A between-groups study with professional actors and actual trauma survivors.

Authors:  Todd C Buckley; Tara Galovski; Edward B Blanchard; Edward J Hickling
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2003-02

3.  Selective processing of threat cues in posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  R J McNally; S P Kaspi; B C Riemann; S B Zeitlin
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1990-11

Review 4.  Are there two qualitatively distinct forms of dissociation? A review and some clinical implications.

Authors:  Emily A Holmes; Richard J Brown; Warren Mansell; R Pasco Fearon; Elaine C M Hunter; Frank Frasquilho; David A Oakley
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01

5.  Forensic applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): screening for feigned disorders in competency to stand trial evaluations.

Authors:  Rebecca L Jackson; Richard Rogers; Kenneth W Sewell
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2005-04

Review 6.  The use of biomarkers in the military: from theory to practice.

Authors:  Rachel Yehuda; Thomas C Neylan; Janine D Flory; Alexander C McFarlane
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.905

7.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Lasting false beliefs and their behavioral consequences.

Authors:  Elke Geraerts; Daniel M Bernstein; Harald Merckelbach; Christel Linders; Linsey Raymaekers; Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-08

9.  Validating the primary care posttraumatic stress disorder screen and the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist with soldiers returning from combat.

Authors:  Paul D Bliese; Kathleen M Wright; Amy B Adler; Oscar Cabrera; Carl A Castro; Charles W Hoge
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2008-04

10.  New onset and persistent symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder self reported after deployment and combat exposures: prospective population based US military cohort study.

Authors:  Tyler C Smith; Margaret A K Ryan; Deborah L Wingard; Donald J Slymen; James F Sallis; Donna Kritz-Silverstein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-01-15
View more
  5 in total

1.  Heart rate variability: Pre-deployment predictor of post-deployment PTSD symptoms.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Pyne; Joseph I Constans; Mark D Wiederhold; Douglas P Gibson; Timothy Kimbrell; Teresa L Kramer; Jeffery A Pitcock; Xiaotong Han; D Keith Williams; Don Chartrand; Richard N Gevirtz; James Spira; Brenda K Wiederhold; Rollin McCraty; Thomas R McCune
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Psychometric Performance of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST) in Veteran PTSD Assessment.

Authors:  Erika J Wolf; Stephanie Ellickson-Larew; Rachel E Guetta; Shaline Escarfulleri; Karen Ryabchenko; Mark W Miller
Journal:  Psychol Inj Law       Date:  2020-04-15

Review 3.  Neurocognitive and Information Processing Biases in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Authors:  Jennifer J Vasterling; Kimberly A Arditte Hall
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Research on PTSD prevalence in OEF/OIF Veterans: expanding investigation of demographic variables.

Authors:  Lynnette A Averill; C J Eubanks Fleming; Pamela L Holens; Sadie E Larsen
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2015-05-12

5.  The Modified Stroop Task Is Susceptible to Feigning: Stroop Performance and Symptom Over-endorsement in Feigned Test Anxiety.

Authors:  Irena Boskovic; Anita J Biermans; Thomas Merten; Marko Jelicic; Lorraine Hope; Harald Merckelbach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.