| Literature DB >> 24273730 |
Stefan T Schwarz1, Maryam Abaei, Vamsi Gontu, Paul S Morgan, Nin Bajaj, Dorothee P Auer.
Abstract
There is increasing interest in developing a reliable, affordable and accessible disease biomarker of Parkinson's disease (PD) to facilitate disease modifying PD-trials. Imaging biomarkers using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can describe parameters such as fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD) or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). These parameters, when measured in the substantia nigra (SN), have not only shown promising but also varying and controversial results. To clarify the potential diagnostic value of nigral DTI in PD and its dependency on selection of region-of-interest, we undertook a high resolution DTI study at 3 T. 59 subjects (32 PD patients, 27 age and sex matched healthy controls) were analysed using manual outlining of SN and substructures, and voxel-based analysis (VBA). We also performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to estimate the effect size (DES) of disease related nigral DTI changes. We found a regional increase in nigral mean diffusivity in PD (mean ± SD, PD 0.80 ± 0.10 vs. controls 0.73 ± 0.06 · 10(- 3) mm(2)/s, p = 0.002), but no difference using a voxel based approach. No significant disease effect was seen using meta-analysis of nigral MD changes (10 studies, DES = + 0.26, p = 0.17, I(2) = 30%). None of the nigral regional or voxel based analyses of this study showed altered fractional anisotropy. Meta-analysis of 11 studies on nigral FA changes revealed a significant PD induced FA decrease. There was, however, a very large variation in results (I(2) = 86%) comparing all studies. After exclusion of five studies with unusual high values of nigral FA in the control group, an acceptable heterogeneity was reached, but there was non-significant disease effect (DES = - 0.5, p = 0.22, I(2) = 28%). The small PD related nigral MD changes in conjunction with the negative findings on VBA and meta-analysis limit the usefulness of nigral MD measures as biomarker of Parkinson's disease. The negative results of nigral FA measurements at regional, sub-regional and voxel level in conjunction with the results of the meta-analysis of nigral FA changes question the stability and validity of this measure as a PD biomarker.Entities:
Keywords: ACE, Addenbrooke's cognitive examination test battery; ADC, Apparent diffusion coefficient; DES, Effect size of disease related nigral changes; DTI, Diffusion tensor imaging; Diffusion weighted imaging; EPI, Echo planar imaging; Fractional anisotropy; ICC, Intraclass correlation coefficient; MD, Mean diffusivity; MRI, Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic resonance imaging; PD, Parkinson's disease; Parkinson's disease; Parkinsonism; ROI, Region/regions of interest; SN, Substantia nigra; SNc, Substantia nigra pars compacta; Substantia nigra; TCS, Transcranial sonography; UPDRS, Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale; VBA, Voxel based analysis
Year: 2013 PMID: 24273730 PMCID: PMC3830065 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.10.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Fig. 1Example of a DTI scan of a healthy control and ROI positions in the SN and control regions.
Columns represent: 1st: T2 weighted b0 image; 2nd: colour coded map of the principle eigenvector of the diffusion matrix; 3rd: FA map; and 4th: MD maps. ROIs are demonstrated in the second row for small ROI (analysis 1) and in the third row for total SN and control ROI in the cerebral peduncle (analysis 2).
Different types of SN ROI analysis in PD patients and controls.
| Analysis 1 (average of small SN ROI) | Analysis 1b (small dorsal SN ROI) | Analysis 2 (variable size whole SN ROI) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD | Controls | p | PD | Controls | p | PD | Controls | p | |
| FA | 0.44 ± 0.05 | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 0.39 | 0.45 ± 0.06 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 0.46 | 0.44 ± 0.04 | 0.45 ± 0.05 | 0.43 |
| MD | 0.801 ± 0.102 | 0.728 ± 0.064 | 0.002 | 0.816 ± 0.097 | 0.748 ± 0.053 | 0.002 | 0.795 ± 0.099 | 0.732 ± 0.055 | 0.005 |
Overview of studies included in the meta-analysis.
| Study name | FA | MD (ADC) | Scanner make | Field-str. | Head coil | DTI dir. | Voxel size [mm] | DTI proc. | M-corr. | Eddy cur. | ROI placem. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✓ | (✓) | Philips Achieva | 3 T | ? | 16 | 0.9 x 0.9 x 3 | DTI studio V3.0.3 | ? | ? | Manual | |
| ✓ | Siemens Magnetom Trio | 3 T | 8 | 42 | 2 x 2 x 2 | DTIPrep | ✓ | ✓ | Manual | ||
| ✓ | ✓ | Philips Intera | 1.5 T | 16 | 32 | 1.8 x 1.8 x 3 | FSL | ✓ | ✓ | Manual | |
| ✓ | ✓ | General Electrics | 1.5 T | 8 | 31 | 2.03 x 2.03 x 3 | FSL V4.1 | ✓ | ✓ | Manual | |
| ✓ | ✓ | Siemens Magnetom Trio | 3 T | ? | 64 | 2 x 2 x 2 | Matlab V7.8 | ? | ? | Manual | |
| ✓ | ✓ | Bruker/Siemens Medspec | 4 T | ? | 6 | 2 x 2 x 3 | FSL | ✓ | ✓ | Semi – Manual | |
| ✓ | ✓ | Siemens Trio | 3 T | 12 | 60 | 2 x 2 x 2 | FSL | ✓ | ✓ | Semi – Manual | |
| ✓ | ✓ | Siemens Allegro | 3 T | ? | 30 | 1.8 x 1.8 x 1.8 | FSL V4 | ✓ | ✓ | Manual | |
| ✓ | Siemens Magnetom Avanto | 1.5 T | 4 | 12 | 1.9 x 1.9 x 2.5 | ? | ? | ? | Manual | ||
| ✓ | General Electrics, Signa | 3 T | 8 | 27 | 0.78 x 0.78 x 4 | DTI studio | ✓ | ✓ | Manual | ||
| ✓ | (✓) | Siemens Avanto | 1.5 T | ? | 12 | 1.2 x 1.2 x 4 | ? | ✓ | ✓ | Manual | |
| this study | ✓ | ✓ | Philips Achieva | 3 T | 8 | 32 | 2 x 2 x 2 | FSL V4.1 | ✓ | ✓ | Manual |
FA = fractional anisotropy measures extracted from study, MD = mean diffusivity measures extracted from study, Field-str. = Field-strength of magnet, Headcoil = Number of channels within the receiver head coil, DTI dir. = Number of DTI diffusion directions for data acquisition, Voxel size [mm] = Size of voxels for acquisition, DTI proc. = Software used to process the DTI data prior to analysis, M-corr = Motion correction used, Eddy cur. = Eddy current correction used, ROI placem. = method of ROI placement. ‘✓’ is used as a positive indicator, ‘?’ is used in unclear cases.
Fig. 2Fractional anisotropy disease effect size Forest plot.
Forest plot of the computed diseases effect sizes (DES, x-axis) of studies included into the initial meta-analysis on fractional anisotropy measures of the substantia nigra when comparing PD patients and controls. All but one included studies demonstrate a decrease of nigral FA in PD patients as indicated by a negative DES. The estimated pooled weighted DES was − 0.9 was highly significant (p < 0.0001), however, there was a large heterogeneity of study results (I2 = 86%).
Fig. 3Scatter-plot of DES versus nigral FA in control arm of studies included in the initial meta-analysis.
The scatter-plot demonstrates that studies with a higher FA in the control arm show the largest variation in disease effect (DES) of PD induced nigral FA changes.
Fig. 4Mean diffusivity disease effect size Forest plot.
Forest plot of the computed diseases effect sizes (DES, x-axis) of different studies on mean diffusivity measures of the substantia nigra when comparing PD patients and controls. In the majority of studies a small increase of MD in PD patients can be observed as indicated by a positive DES.
Participant details of studies included in the meta-analysis.
| Study name | Controls | PD patients | Average age PD and control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Age | N | Age | UPDRS | HY stage | ||
| 12 | 60.8 ± 8.5 | 11 | 60.4 ± 9.3 | 23.5 ± 9.5 | 1–3 | 60.6 | |
| 28 | 59.8 ± 7.0 | 40 | 60.8 ± 8.2 | 23.5 ± 15.1 | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 60.4 | |
| 13 | 60 | 13 | 64 | 32.5 ± 6.1 | 1.76 ± 0.26 | 62 | |
| 14 | 55.2 ± 6.2 | 14 | 56 ± 4.8 | ? | 1.3 ± 0.42 | 55.6 | |
| 30 | 65 ± 5.1 | 30 | 64.5 ± 3.4 | 33.6 ± 14.1 | ? | 64.8 | |
| 20 | 67.2 ± 8 | 12 | 67.4 ± 8 | 26.3 ± 12.2 | ? | 67.3 | |
| 10 | 64.4 ± 9.9 | 10 | 63.7 ± 6.7 | ? | 2.3 ± 0.67 | 64.1 | |
| 22 | 57.4 ± 9.7 | 30 | 61.9 ± 11.1 | 12.0 ± 5.9 | 1.66 ± 0.48 | 59.7 | |
| 10 | 58.1 ± 8 | 10 | 63.8 ± 15.7 | 20.5 ± 8.3 | ? | 61 | |
| 14 | 58 | 14 | 57.2 ± 9.6 | 18 ± 8.1 | 1.71 ± 0.46 | 57.6 | |
| 78 | 61.9 ± 9.3 | 73 | 63.6 ± 9.8 | ? | 2.4 | 62.8 | |
| This data | 27 | 59.9 ± 10.5 | 32 | 64.8 ± 11.8 | 25.4 ± 13.7 | 1.7 ± 0.9 | 62.5 |
N = Number of participants, UPDRS = Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale, HY stage = Hoehn and Yahr stage, ? = data not demonstrated in publication.
FA DES of studies included into the initial meta-analysis of nigral FA changes in PD.
| Study name | PD patients | Controls | 95% confidence interval | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean FA | SD | N | Mean FA | SD | Disease effect size (DES) | SE | Lower | Upper | |
| 11 | 0.43 | 0.04 | 12 | 0.44 | 0.03 | − 0.263 | 0.419 | − 1.085 | 0.559 | |
| 40 | 0.49 | 0.05 | 28 | 0.53 | 0.04 | − 0.915 | 0.259 | − 1.422 | − 0.407 | |
| 13 | 0.37 | 0.04 | 13 | 0.41 | 0.02 | − 1.222 | 0.43 | − 2.064 | − 0.379 | |
| 14 | 0.42 | 0.03 | 14 | 0.45 | 0.03 | − 1.091 | 0.407 | − 1.889 | − 0.293 | |
| 30 | 0.71 | 0.10 | 30 | 0.66 | 0.10 | 0.52 | 0.263 | 0.005 | 1.034 | |
| 12 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 20 | 0.49 | 0.07 | − 2.169 | 0.46 | − 3.071 | − 1.267 | |
| 10 | 0.34 | 0.07 | 10 | 0.37 | 0.07 | − 0.314 | 0.45 | − 1.197 | 0.568 | |
| 30 | 0.50 | 0.04 | 22 | 0.53 | 0.03 | − 0.716 | 0.29 | − 1.284 | − 0.148 | |
| 14 | 0.44 | 0.02 | 14 | 0.54 | 0.02 | − 5.541 | 0.856 | − 7.219 | − 3.862 | |
| 73 | 0.40 | 0.03 | 78 | 0.42 | 0.03 | − 0.414 | 0.165 | − 0.736 | − 0.091 | |
| This study | 32 | 0.44 | 0.05 | 27 | 0.45 | 0.05 | − 0.196 | 0.262 | − 0.709 | 0.317 |
N = Number of participants, SD = Standard deviation, SE = Standard error. Weight = weighting of study for calculation of the pooled weighted estimation of FA DES.
MD DES of studies included into the meta-analysis of PD induced nigral MD changes.
| Study name | PD patients | Control | 95% confidence interval | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean MD or (ADC) | SD | N | Mean MD or (ADC) | SD | Disease effect size (DES) | SE | Lower | Upper | Weight | |
| 11 | (2.41) | 0.1715 | 12 | (2.345) | 0.1295 | 0.431 | 0.423 | − 0.398 | 1.259 | 0.049 | |
| 13 | 0.814 | 0.106 | 13 | 0.796 | 0.066 | 0.204 | 0.393 | − 0.567 | 0.975 | 0.057 | |
| 12 | 9.945 | 0.615 | 20 | 9.49 | 1.315 | 0.41 | 0.369 | − 0.314 | 1.133 | 0.064 | |
| 30 | 0.68 | 0.15 | 30 | 0.72 | 0.13 | − 0.285 | 0.26 | − 0.794 | 0.224 | 0.13 | |
| 14 | 0.84 | 0.048 | 14 | 0.793 | 0.379 | 0.174 | 0.379 | − 0.568 | 0.916 | 0.061 | |
| 10 | 0.98 | 0.139 | 10 | 0.9311 | 0.166 | 0.319 | 0.45 | − 0.563 | 1.202 | 0.043 | |
| 30 | 0.778 | 0.0805 | 22 | 0.754 | 0.0508 | 0.345 | 0.283 | − 0.209 | 0.899 | 0.109 | |
| 10 | 0.79 | 0.08 | 10 | 0.74 | 0.04 | 0.791 | 0.466 | − 0.123 | 1.704 | 0.04 | |
| 73 | (7.3273) | 0.795 | 78 | (7.32) | 0.651 | 0.01 | 0.163 | − 0.309 | 0.329 | 0.33 | |
| Own dataset | 32 | 0.801 | 0.102 | 27 | 0.728 | 0.064 | 0.841 | 0.273 | 0.306 | 1.376 | 0.117 |
MD unit = 10− 3 mm2/s. The study indicated by * reported the MD unit = 10− 6 mm2/s. Studies reporting ADC indicated with brackets. N = Number of participants, SD = Standard deviation, SE = Standard error. Weight = weighting of study for calculation of the pooled weighted estimation of MD DES.