PURPOSE: Intraperitoneal mesh fixation for hernia repair is associated with adhesion formation. In this experimental study, adhesions against absorbable and non-absorbable fixation methods were compared. METHODS: Six commercially available fixation methods were placed intraperitoneally in rats with a small pore polypropylene mesh coated on one side with ePTFE (Intramesh T1(®)). Two non-absorbable fixation methods: Prolene(®) (polypropylene) sutures and Protack(®) (titanium) tackers. Four absorbable methods: Vicryl(®) sutures (polyglactin), Absorbatack(®) and Permasorb(®) tackers (both mixes of lactic and glycolic acids) and Tisseel Duo(®) (fibrin glue). Adhesions and histology were studied at 7 and 90 days follow-up. In addition, fixation methods were placed without mesh, in order to study the reaction to the fixation method per se. RESULTS: No adhesion formation, but also inadequate mesh fixation was found with Tisseel Duo(®), which had been completely resorbed at 7 days follow-up. Vicryl(®) sutures could no longer be detected at 90 days follow-up and were associated with a favorable adhesion profile. All other fixation methods were still intact 90 days after implantation. When placed without mesh, adhesion formation was significantly less than placed with a mesh (18 vs. 93 %, P < 0.001). Without mesh, adhesions were worst with Permasorb(®) tackers. CONCLUSIONS: Absorbable fixation methods such as polyglactin sutures and fibrin glue show a favorable adhesion profile compared to longer-term absorbable or non-absorbable fixation methods. However, before using fibrin glue as a single fixation method more research is required.
PURPOSE: Intraperitoneal mesh fixation for hernia repair is associated with adhesion formation. In this experimental study, adhesions against absorbable and non-absorbable fixation methods were compared. METHODS: Six commercially available fixation methods were placed intraperitoneally in rats with a small pore polypropylene mesh coated on one side with ePTFE (Intramesh T1(®)). Two non-absorbable fixation methods: Prolene(®) (polypropylene) sutures and Protack(®) (titanium) tackers. Four absorbable methods: Vicryl(®) sutures (polyglactin), Absorbatack(®) and Permasorb(®) tackers (both mixes of lactic and glycolic acids) and Tisseel Duo(®) (fibrin glue). Adhesions and histology were studied at 7 and 90 days follow-up. In addition, fixation methods were placed without mesh, in order to study the reaction to the fixation method per se. RESULTS: No adhesion formation, but also inadequate mesh fixation was found with Tisseel Duo(®), which had been completely resorbed at 7 days follow-up. Vicryl(®) sutures could no longer be detected at 90 days follow-up and were associated with a favorable adhesion profile. All other fixation methods were still intact 90 days after implantation. When placed without mesh, adhesion formation was significantly less than placed with a mesh (18 vs. 93 %, P < 0.001). Without mesh, adhesions were worst with Permasorb(®) tackers. CONCLUSIONS: Absorbable fixation methods such as polyglactin sutures and fibrin glue show a favorable adhesion profile compared to longer-term absorbable or non-absorbable fixation methods. However, before using fibrin glue as a single fixation method more research is required.
Authors: Juan Antonio Martín-Cartes; Salvador Morales-Conde; Juan Manuel Suárez-Grau; Manuel Bustos-Jiménez; Jean-Marie Hisnard Cadet-Dussort; Francisco López-Bernal; Juan Morcillo-Azcárate; Juan David Tutosaus-Gómez; Salvador Morales-Méndez Journal: Surg Today Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 2.549
Authors: B de Goede; P J Klitsie; B J H van Kempen; L Timmermans; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; J F Lange Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Jacobus W A Burger; Roland W Luijendijk; Wim C J Hop; Jens A Halm; Emiel G G Verdaasdonk; Johannes Jeekel Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Demetrios Moris; Jeffery Chakedis; Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Ana Wilson; Mairead Marion Hennessy; Antonios Athanasiou; Eliza W Beal; Chrysoula Argyrou; Evangelos Felekouras; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: S Kapoulas; A Papalois; G Papadakis; G Tsoulfas; E Christoforidis; B Papaziogas; D Schizas; G Chatzimavroudis Journal: Hernia Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 4.739