Literature DB >> 21242440

More recurrences after hernia mesh fixation with short-term absorbable sutures: A registry study of 82 015 Lichtenstein repairs.

Bengt Novik1, Pär Nordin, Stefan Skullman, Jan Dalenbäck, Lars Enochsson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of different mesh fixation suture materials on the risk of recurrence after Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.
DESIGN: Observational, population-based registry study.
SETTING: Data from the nationwide Swedish Hernia Registry. PATIENTS: All 82 015 Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasties with sutured mesh fixation in adolescents and adults (15 years or older) from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2009, at surgical units enrolled in the Swedish Hernia Registry.
INTERVENTIONS: Mesh fixation with nonabsorbable, long-term absorbable, or short-term absorbable sutures. Main Outcome Measure Relative risk (RR) for reoperation due to recurrence of a hernia in the same groin during the study period, based on cumulative reoperation rates adjusted for time and confounding variables.
RESULTS: For each study group, RR was calculated with multiregression analysis. There was no significant difference in risk for reoperation after mesh fixation with standard nonabsorbable sutures (RR, 1) or with long-term absorbable sutures (RR, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.55; P = .49). Short-term absorbable sutures, however, more than doubled that risk (RR, 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.67-2.99; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: With regard to recurrence risk, long-term absorbable sutures are an excellent alternative to permanent sutures for mesh fixation in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty. Short-term absorbable sutures entail an independent risk factor for recurrence and should therefore be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21242440     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Preperitoneal Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia: an Integrated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; Jennifer Caswell; Krishna K Singh
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 2.  Evidence-Based Hernia Treatment in Adults.

Authors:  Dieter Berger
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  [Diagnostics and therapy of chronic pain following hernia operation].

Authors:  D Berger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Adhesions to sutures, tackers, and glue for intraperitoneal mesh fixation: an experimental study.

Authors:  M H F Schreinemacher; K W Y van Barneveld; E Peeters; M Miserez; M J J Gijbels; J-W M Greve; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Inversed relationship between completeness of follow-up and coverage of postoperative complications in gallstone surgery and ERCP: a potential source of bias in patient registers.

Authors:  Lars Enochsson; My Blohm; Gabriel Sandblom; Eduard Jonas; Bengt Hallerbäck; Lars Lundell; Johanna Österberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Data and outcome of inguinal hernia repair in hernia registers - a review of the literature.

Authors:  Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2017-01-31

Review 7.  Surgical risk factors for recurrence in inguinal hernia repair - a review of the literature.

Authors:  Henning Niebuhr; Ferdinand Köckerling
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2017-04-13

8.  Association of Mesh and Fixation Options with Reoperation Risk after Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Surgery: A Swedish Hernia Registry Study of 25,190 Totally Extraperitoneal and Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repairs.

Authors:  Bengt Novik; Gabriel Sandblom; Christoph Ansorge; Anders Thorell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.532

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.