Literature DB >> 24271827

Cost comparison of genioplasty: when indicated, wire osteosynthesis is more cost effective than plate and screw fixation.

David S Precious1, Alvaro B Cardoso, Mônica Christine A C Cardoso, Jean-Charles Doucet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This retrospective study was conducted to determine the difference in the cost of genioplasty according to the osseous fixation technique used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study among orthognathic surgery patients treated over a 54-month period ending in June 30, 2011 was conducted. Immediately post surgery, panoramic and cephalometric radiographs of these patients were assessed to determine the presence of genioplasty procedure and the type of fixation used. The cost of the actual fixation used by the surgeons was compared with that which the cost would have been had the surgeons used the criteria described in the hypotheses, for plate and screws fixation when genioplasty is performed.
RESULTS: A review of 1,498 orthognathic surgery patients revealed that 473 of these patients underwent genioplasty. Out of 473 patients, 425 had genioplasty to either advance and-or superiorly reposition the chin. Of these, 230 had wire osteosynthesis and 243 had some form of rigid fixation. The unit cost of fixation for genioplasty when wire osteosynthesis is used is less than C$5.00. The mean unit cost estimate in our patient group when pre-bent plates are used was C$542.00. All 230 patients in whom wire osteosynthesis was used demonstrated stable fixation of the bony parts and no immediate postsurgical adjustment was required in any patient.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients requiring genioplasty to advance and-or superiorly reposition the chin, it is possible to use wire osteosynthesis to achieve accurate and stable fixation while reducing the fixation cost by more than C$500.00 per case. The surgeon should include cost considerations in the selection of treatment methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24271827     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-013-0437-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  14 in total

1.  Maintenance of soft tissue changes after rigid versus wire fixation for mandibular advancement, with and without genioplasty.

Authors:  C Dolce; P D Johnson; J E Van Sickels; R A Bays; J D Rugh
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2001-08

Review 2.  Extended genioplasty: long-term cephalometric, morphometric and sensory results.

Authors:  M J Troulis; G J Kearns; D H Perrott; L B Kaban
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Anatomic placement of fixation devices in genioplasty.

Authors:  D S Precious; J E Armstrong; D Morais
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1992-01

4.  Bone resorption, stability, and soft-tissue changes following large chin advancements.

Authors:  W D Polido; L de Clairefont Regis; W H Bell
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  M-shaped genioplasty: a new surgical technique for sagittal and vertical chin augmentation: three case reports.

Authors:  Rodrigo Fariña; Salvador Valladares; Leonardo Aguilar; Juan Pastrian; Francisco Rojas
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 6.  Stability of orthognathic surgery: a review of rigid fixation.

Authors:  J E Van Sickels; D A Richardson
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.651

7.  Osseous genioplasty in facial aesthetic surgery--a personal perspective reviewing 54 patients.

Authors:  B M Jones; M J J Vesely
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Correction of anterior mandibular vertical excess: the functional genioplasty.

Authors:  D S Precious; J Delaire
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1985-03

9.  Long-term skeletal and soft-tissue responses after advancement genioplasty.

Authors:  Stefan Shaughnessy; Karim A Mobarak; Hans Erik Høgevold; Lisen Espeland
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 10.  [Treatment of chin deformities].

Authors:  Eduardo Morera Serna; Esteban Scola Pliego; Nuria Mir Ulldemolins; Alejandro Martínez Morán
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2008 Aug-Sep
View more
  2 in total

1.  Functional genioplasty in growing patients.

Authors:  Sylvain Chamberland; William R Proffit; Pier-Eric Chamberland
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Evaluation of stability and esthetic outcome following rigid fixation of a new sagittal genioplasty technique - A clinical study.

Authors:  Subia Ekram; K V Arunkumar; Apoorva Mowar; Amit Khera
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-03-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.