Literature DB >> 1995814

Bone resorption, stability, and soft-tissue changes following large chin advancements.

W D Polido1, L de Clairefont Regis, W H Bell.   

Abstract

Large advancement genioplasties were performed in 10 patients (mean advancement, 11.7 mm) by horizontal osteotomy of the inferior border of the mandible, with preservation of a musculoperiosteal pedicle to the advanced genial segment. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and long-term follow-up lateral cephalometric radiographs were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the osseous and soft-tissue changes of the chin. After a mean follow-up period of 15 months, 76% of the initial advancement was preserved, representing 24% osseous resorption. The enveloping soft tissues of the chin followed the bony movement in a ratio of 1:0.88. Horizontal osteotomy of the inferior border of the mandible was a relatively stable procedure when used for large chin advancements. The broadcast possible musculoperiosteal pedicle should remain attached to the advanced genial segment to minimize osseous resorption and to achieve more predictable soft-tissue changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1995814     DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90214-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of ultrasonic and conventional surgical techniques for genioplasty combined with two different osteosynthesis plates: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Nassim Ayoub; Ulrike Fritz; Andreas Prescher; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Profile changes after conventional and chin shield genioplasty.

Authors:  Stuti Singh; Divya Mehrotra; S Mohammad
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2014-08-28

3.  Skeletal and Soft-Tissue Stability Following Advancement Genioplasty: A Comparative Analysis between Wire and Miniplate Osteosynthesis.

Authors:  Ramandeep Singh Brar; Ritesh Gupta; Shuchi Gupta; Kuldeep Chaudhary; Preeti Singh; Mandeep Kaur
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

4.  Retrusive chin reconstruction after burn injuries using submental and labiomental fat flaps: an innovative method.

Authors:  Ali Manafi; Aydin H Pooli; Peiman Habibollahi; Lila Saidian
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-11-23

5.  Advancement genioplasty--cephalometric analysis of osseous and soft tissue changes.

Authors:  P Sridhar Reddy; Bina Kashyap; Neelakamal Hallur; B C Sikkerimath
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-06

6.  Cost comparison of genioplasty: when indicated, wire osteosynthesis is more cost effective than plate and screw fixation.

Authors:  David S Precious; Alvaro B Cardoso; Mônica Christine A C Cardoso; Jean-Charles Doucet
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-11-23

7.  Musculoskeletal Changes as a Sequel to Advancement Genioplasty: A Long-Term Cephalometric Prospective Study.

Authors:  Abhishek Budharapu; Ramen Sinha; David P Tauro; Prabhat K Tiwari
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-06-09

8.  Long term stability following genioplasty: a cephalometric study.

Authors:  B Lakshman Kumar; G Kranthi Praveen Raju; N Dilip Kumar; G Vivek Reddy; B Ravindra Naik; C Ravindranath Achary
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015-04

9.  Functional genioplasty in growing patients.

Authors:  Sylvain Chamberland; William R Proffit; Pier-Eric Chamberland
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Evaluation of stability and esthetic outcome following rigid fixation of a new sagittal genioplasty technique - A clinical study.

Authors:  Subia Ekram; K V Arunkumar; Apoorva Mowar; Amit Khera
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-03-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.