Literature DB >> 24269260

Pattern of ascending aortic dimensions predicts the growth rate of the aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve.

Alessandro Della Corte1, Ciro Bancone2, Marianna Buonocore2, Giovanni Dialetto2, Franco E Covino2, Sabrina Manduca2, Giancarlo Scognamiglio3, Veronica D'Oria2, Marisa De Feo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify risk factors for rapid growth of the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease, taking into account its phenotypic variability.
BACKGROUND: Phenotypic heterogeneity of BAV-related aortopathy has recently been widely recognized. However, few studies have addressed the determinants of aortic growth so far, not distinguishing among morphological phenotypes.
METHODS: Serial retrospective data on 133 adult outpatients with BAV undergoing echocardiographic follow-up were analyzed to search for factors associated with aortic diameter growth over time and with rapid aortic growth (fifth quintile of growth rate distribution), focusing on the impact of different valve morphotypes (i.e., cusp fusion pattern: right-left coronary [RL] and right-noncoronary [RN]) and previously defined aortic phenotypes (nondilated aorta, ascending dilation, root dilation).
RESULTS: The RL pattern was present in 69% of patients with BAV and RN in 31%. At baseline, an ascending dilation phenotype was observed in 57% of patients and a root phenotype in 13.5%. No patient with RN-BAV had a root dilation phenotype at either baseline or last examination. Follow-up time averaged 4.0 ± 2.7 years (535 patient-years). The mean growth rate was 0.3 mm/year at the sinuses and 0.6 mm/year at the ascending level. Aortic regurgitation predicted an increase in ascending diameter over time (odds ratio [OR]: 2.3; p = 0.03). Root phenotype at presentation, not absolute baseline diameter, was an independent predictor of fast progression (>0.9 mm/year) for the ascending tract (OR: 14; p = 0.001). Fast growth was rarely seen in patients with the RL morphotype and ascending phenotype (6% at the root and 10% at the ascending level).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BAV, the root phenotype (aortic dilation predominantly at the sinuses, with normal or less dilated ascending tract) may be a marker of more severe aortopathy, warranting closer surveillance and earlier treatment. The more common ascending phenotype proved to be a more stable disease entity, generally with slower progression.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AR; BAV; MVP; RL; RN; STJ; aortic dilation; aortic regurgitation; ascending aorta; bicuspid aortic valve; echocardiography; follow-up; mitral valve prolapse; right-left coronary; right-noncoronary; sinotubular junction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24269260     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  39 in total

1.  Aortic shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve with stenosis and insufficiency.

Authors:  Yan Shan; Jun Li; Yongshi Wang; Boting Wu; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Chunsheng Wang; Xiaolin Wang; Xianhong Shu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Bicuspid aortic valve syndrome: a multidisciplinary approach for a complex entity.

Authors:  María Martín; Rebeca Lorca; José Rozado; Rubén Alvarez-Cabo; Juan Calvo; Isaac Pascual; Helena Cigarrán; Isabel Rodríguez; César Morís
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Abnormal aortic stiffness in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: phenotypic variation determined by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Thananya Boonyasirinant; Prabhakar Rajiah; Scott D Flamm
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Assessment of altered three-dimensional blood characteristics in aortic disease by velocity distribution analysis.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Alex J Barker; Pim van Ooij; Susanne Schnell; Jyothy Puthumana; Robert O Bonow; Jeremy D Collins; James C Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Interval changes in aortic peak velocity and wall shear stress in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Ozair Rahman; Michael Scott; Emilie Bollache; Kenichiro Suwa; Jeremy Collins; James Carr; Paul Fedak; Patrick McCarthy; Chris Malaisrie; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  MRI-based Protocol to Characterize the Relationship Between Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology and Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Lucia Mirabella; Alex J Barker; Neelakantan Saikrishnan; Elizabeth R Coco; Daniel J Mangiameli; Michael Markl; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Bicuspid valve-related aortic disease: flow assessment with conventional phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Nicholas S Burris; Michael D Hope
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 8.  Year in review: bicuspid aortopathy.

Authors:  Paul W M Fedak; Alex J Barker; Subodh Verma
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Regional Disruptions in Endothelial Nitric Oxide Pathway Associated With Bicuspid Aortic Valve.

Authors:  Mary P Kotlarczyk; Marie Billaud; Benjamin R Green; Jennifer C Hill; Sruti Shiva; Eric E Kelley; Julie A Phillippi; Thomas G Gleason
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Full online-only version.

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Paul W M Fedak; Elizabeth H Stephens; Thomas G Gleason; Evaldas Girdauskas; John S Ikonomidis; Ali Khoynezhad; Samuel C Siu; Subodh Verma; Michael D Hope; Duke E Cameron; Donald F Hammer; Joseph S Coselli; Marc R Moon; Thoralf M Sundt; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Alessandro Della Corte; Hector I Michelena; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.