Literature DB >> 24269255

Do hunger and exposure to food affect scores on a measure of hedonic hunger? An experimental study.

Ashley A Witt1, Greer A Raggio2, Meghan L Butryn2, Michael R Lowe3.   

Abstract

Research suggests that visceral bodily states, such as hunger, can affect participants' responses on self-report measures of eating behavior. The present study evaluated the influence of hunger and exposure to palatable food on self-reported hedonic appetite, measured using the Power of Food Scale (PFS). A secondary aim was to evaluate the effects of these manipulations on self-reported external eating and disinhibition. Participants (N=67) ate a standardized meal followed by a 4-h fast. Participants were randomized to one of four groups (Fasted/Food Absence, Fasted/Food Exposure, Fed/Food Absence, or Fed/Food Exposure). In Phase I of the experiment (Hunger Manipulation), participants randomized to the "Fed" group drank a protein shake, while those in the "Fasted" group did not receive a shake. In Phase II (Palatable Food Exposure), participants in the "Food Exposure" group were visually exposed to palatable food items, while "Food Absence" participants were not. All participants completed the PFS, Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire External Eating subscale, and the Disinhibition subscale from the Eating Inventory during Phase II. Results showed no significant main or interactive effects of Hunger condition or Food Exposure condition on PFS, External Eating, or Disinhibition scores (all p's<.33). All effect sizes were small (partial etas squared ⩽.015). Manipulation checks confirmed that the intended hunger and exposure interventions were successful. Results suggest that relatively short fasting periods (e.g., 4h) analogous to typical breaks between meals are not associated with changes in scores on the PFS, External Eating, or Disinhibition scales. Hedonic hunger, at least as measured by the PFS, may represent a relatively stable construct that is not substantially affected by daily variations in hunger. In addition, individual differences in exposure to food in the immediate environment are unlikely to confound research using these measures.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DEBQ; Disinhibition; Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire; EI; Eating Inventory; Eating behavior; External Eating; Hedonic hunger; PFS; Power of Food Scale; Self-report

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24269255     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  11 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of Power of Food Scale in Iranian adult population: gender-related differences in hedonic hunger.

Authors:  Fereshteh Aliasghari; Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi; Neda Lotfi Yaghin; Reza Mahdavi
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 4.652

2.  Validation of the Turkish version of the power of food scale in adult population.

Authors:  Izzet Ulker; Feride Ayyildiz; Hilal Yildiran
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Exploring the "weight" of food cravings and thought suppression among Cuban adults.

Authors:  Boris C Rodríguez-Martín; Patricia Gil-Pérez; Irvin Pérez-Morales
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.652

4.  Power of Food Scale in association with weight outcomes and dieting in a nationally representative cohort of U.S. young adults.

Authors:  L M Lipsky; T R Nansel; D L Haynie; D Liu; M H Eisenberg; B Simons-Morton
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 5.  Glucagon-like peptide 1 in the pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy of clinical obesity.

Authors:  Ananthi Anandhakrishnan; Márta Korbonits
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2016-12-15

6.  Associations between hedonic hunger and BMI during a two-year behavioural weight loss trial.

Authors:  Bethan R Mead; Emma J Boyland; Paul Christiansen; Jason C G Halford; Susan A Jebb; Amy L Ahern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  It's the power of food: individual differences in food cue responsiveness and snacking in everyday life.

Authors:  Benjamin Schüz; Natalie Schüz; Stuart G Ferguson
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 8.  Bariatric endocrinology: principles of medical practice.

Authors:  J Michael Gonzalez-Campoy; Bruce Richardson; Conor Richardson; David Gonzalez-Cameron; Ayesha Ebrahim; Pamela Strobel; Tiphani Martinez; Beth Blaha; Maria Ransom; Jessica Quinonez-Weislow; Andrea Pierson; Miguel Gonzalez Ahumada
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.257

9.  Task-Based and Questionnaire Measures of Inhibitory Control Are Differentially Affected by Acute Food Restriction and by Motivationally Salient Food Stimuli in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Savani Bartholdy; Jiumu Cheng; Ulrike Schmidt; Iain C Campbell; Owen G O'Daly
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-29

10.  Association between hedonic hunger and body-mass index versus obesity status.

Authors:  Gabriela Ribeiro; Marta Camacho; Osvaldo Santos; Cristina Pontes; Sandra Torres; Albino J Oliveira-Maia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.