Literature DB >> 24269175

A pelvic implant orthosis in rodents, for spinal cord injury rehabilitation, and for brain machine interface research: construction, surgical implantation and validation.

Ubong Ime Udoekwere1, Chintan S Oza2, Simon F Giszter3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rodents are important model systems used to explore spinal cord injury (SCI) and rehabilitation, and brain machine interfaces (BMI). We present a new method to provide mechanical interaction for BMI and rehabilitation in rat models of SCI. NEW
METHOD: We present the design and implantation procedures for a pelvic orthosis that allows direct force application to the skeleton in brain machine interface and robot rehabilitation applications in rodents. We detail the materials, construction, machining, surgery and validation of the device.
RESULTS: We describe the statistical validation of the implant procedures by comparing stepping parameters of 8 rats prior to and after implantation and surgical recovery. An ANOVA showed no effects of the implantation on stepping. Paired tests in the individual rats also showed no effect in 7/8 rats and minor effects in the last rat, within the group's variance. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHODS: Our method allows interaction with rats at the pelvis without any perturbation of normal stepping in the intact rat. The method bypasses slings, and cuffs, avoiding cuff or slings squeezing the abdomen, or other altered sensory feedback. Our implant osseointegrates, and thus allows an efficient high bandwidth mechanical coupling to a robot. The implants support quadrupedal training and are readily integrated into either treadmill or overground contexts.
CONCLUSIONS: Our novel device and procedures support a range of novel experimental designs and motor tests for rehabilitative and augmentation devices in intact and SCI model rats, with the advantage of allowing direct force application at the pelvic bones.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanic perturbations; Brain machine interface; Locomotion; Neurorobotics; Robot rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24269175      PMCID: PMC4065419          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  13 in total

1.  Versatile robotic interface to evaluate, enable and train locomotion and balance after neuromotor disorders.

Authors:  Nadia Dominici; Urs Keller; Heike Vallery; Lucia Friedli; Rubia van den Brand; Michelle L Starkey; Pavel Musienko; Robert Riener; Grégoire Courtine
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Adaptation to a cortex-controlled robot attached at the pelvis and engaged during locomotion in rats.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; Simon F Giszter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Partial and complete deafferentation of cat hindlimb: the contribution of behavioral substitution to recovery of motor function.

Authors:  M E Goldberger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effect of skin movement on the analysis of hindlimb kinematics during treadmill locomotion in rats.

Authors:  Vitor M Filipe; José E Pereira; Luís M Costa; Ana C Maurício; Pedro A Couto; Pedro Melo-Pinto; Artur S P Varejão
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 5.  Interactive robots for neuro-rehabilitation.

Authors:  Neville Hogan; Hermano I Krebs
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Using robotics to teach the spinal cord to walk.

Authors:  Ray D de Leon; Marc D Kubasak; Patricia E Phelps; Wojciech K Timoszyk; David J Reinkensmeyer; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  2002-10

7.  A 3D analysis of hindlimb motion during treadmill locomotion in rats after a 14-day episode of simulated microgravity.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Canu; Cyril Garnier; François-Xavier Lepoutre; Maurice Falempin
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Neuromechanical control of locomotion in the rat.

Authors:  Anil K Thota; Sonia Carlson Watson; Elizabeth Knapp; Brian Thompson; Ranu Jung
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Multiple types of movement-related information encoded in hindlimb/trunk cortex in rats and potentially available for brain-machine interface controls.

Authors:  Weiguo Song; Arun Ramakrishnan; Ubong I Udoekwere; Simon F Giszter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Robot application of elastic fields to the pelvis of the spinal transected rat: a tool for detailed assessment and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Ubong I Udoekwere; Arun Ramakrishnan; Lollise Mbi; Simon F Giszter
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2006
View more
  5 in total

1.  Motor primitives are determined in early development and are then robustly conserved into adulthood.

Authors:  Qi Yang; David Logan; Simon F Giszter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Trunk robot rehabilitation training with active stepping reorganizes and enriches trunk motor cortex representations in spinal transected rats.

Authors:  Chintan S Oza; Simon F Giszter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A novel device for studying weight supported, quadrupedal overground locomotion in spinal cord injured rats.

Authors:  Marvin Hamlin; Terence Traughber; David J Reinkensmeyer; Ray D de Leon
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Plasticity and alterations of trunk motor cortex following spinal cord injury and non-stepping robot and treadmill training.

Authors:  Chintan S Oza; Simon F Giszter
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  Teaching Adult Rats Spinalized as Neonates to Walk Using Trunk Robotic Rehabilitation: Elements of Success, Failure, and Dependence.

Authors:  Ubong I Udoekwere; Chintan S Oza; Simon F Giszter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 6.167

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.