Peter Mylon1, Roger Lewis2, Matt J Carré2, Nicolas Martin3, Steven Brown4. 1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom. Electronic address: peter.mylon@manchester.ac.uk. 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom. 3. School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Surgery, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of gloves on practitioners' performance has not been a major factor in their design. To determine the critical elements of performance and design appropriate tests, data from clinicians were needed. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were carried out with medical practitioners from various disciplines, in which they were asked about their glove use, their views on gloves, medical tasks requiring the highest manual performance or most affected by gloves, and what the main issues with glove use were. RESULTS: Many participants expressed a preference for latex over nitrile, with glove fit being the main reason given. Satisfaction with surgical gloves (generally latex) was high but less so with examination gloves, which were generally nitrile. Tactile sensation, comfort, and donning were also seen as major issues with glove use. A number of tasks were identified for possible development as tests. CONCLUSION: Performance in medical practice needs to be clearly defined, separating perceived and measured performance, and understanding the effect of glove material, fit, and thickness. Development of new glove performance tests based on the tasks identified is an important part of this.
BACKGROUND: The effect of gloves on practitioners' performance has not been a major factor in their design. To determine the critical elements of performance and design appropriate tests, data from clinicians were needed. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were carried out with medical practitioners from various disciplines, in which they were asked about their glove use, their views on gloves, medical tasks requiring the highest manual performance or most affected by gloves, and what the main issues with glove use were. RESULTS: Many participants expressed a preference for latex over nitrile, with glove fit being the main reason given. Satisfaction with surgical gloves (generally latex) was high but less so with examination gloves, which were generally nitrile. Tactile sensation, comfort, and donning were also seen as major issues with glove use. A number of tasks were identified for possible development as tests. CONCLUSION: Performance in medical practice needs to be clearly defined, separating perceived and measured performance, and understanding the effect of glove material, fit, and thickness. Development of new glove performance tests based on the tasks identified is an important part of this.
Authors: Philipp Moog; Manuela Schulz; Julia Betzl; Daniel Schmauss; Jörn A Lohmeyer; Hans-Günther Machens; Kai Megerle; Holger C Erne Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2020-08-08