Literature DB >> 24268727

Investigations into implantation failure in oocyte-donation recipients.

Pedro N Barri1, Buenaventura Coroleu2, Elisabet Clua2, Rosa Tur2, Montserrat Boada2, Ignacio Rodriguez2.   

Abstract

In recent decades, the Western world has been experiencing a societal trend to prioritize the professional careers of women who postpone motherhood to about 40 years of age, when, unfortunately, natural reproductive potential declines. This is the reason why these women increasingly find it necessary to resort to oocyte donation to have a child. Thanks to the young age of the donors, the efficacy of oocyte donation is the highest of all assisted reproduction treatments and pregnancy rates achieved with this technique exceed 50%. Moreover, the large registries from ESHRE and ASRM show live birth rates close to this figure. However, there are patients who experience repeated failures in several oocyte-donation cycles, and so far oocyte-donation repeated implantation failure has not been clearly defined. This study analysed the results obtained from 2531 oocyte-donation cycles carried out in 1990 patients and defines oocyte-donation repeated implantation failure as failure to implant with more than two embryo transfers and more than four high-grade embryos transferred. This study observed this condition in 140 oocyte recipients (7%). Also, oocyte cohort size, uterine factors and systemic thrombophilias as important aetiological factors were identified were to offer new therapeutic strategies to patients.
Copyright © 2013 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; implantation failure; infertility; oocyte donation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24268727     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  6 in total

1.  Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.

Authors:  E Rocafort; M Enciso; A Leza; J Sarasa; J Aizpurua
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Is younger better? Donor age less than 25 does not predict more favorable outcomes after in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Leigh A Humphries; Laura E Dodge; Erin B Kennedy; Kathryn C Humm; Michele R Hacker; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Role of SIRT1 and Progesterone Resistance in Normal and Abnormal Endometrium.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Kim; Steven L Young; Tsutomu Sasaki; Jeffrey L Deaton; David P Schammel; Wilder Alberto Palomino; Jae-Wook Jeong; Bruce A Lessey
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.134

4.  Electron Transport Chain Remodeling by GSK3 during Oogenesis Connects Nutrient State to Reproduction.

Authors:  Matthew H Sieber; Michael B Thomsen; Allan C Spradling
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Endometrial cancer in a woman undergoing hysteroscopy for recurrent IVF failure.

Authors:  Pietro Gambadauro; Johannes Gudmundsson
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

6.  Development of A Questionnaire to Measure Attitude toward Oocyte Donation.

Authors:  Reza Omani Samani; Leila Mounesan; Zahra Ezabadi; Samira Vesali
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-10-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.