Literature DB >> 24267936

Judgment, inquiry, engagement, voice: reenvisioning an undergraduate nursing curriculum using a shared decision-making model.

Patricia O'Brien D'Antonio1, Ann Marie Walsh Brennan, Martha A Q Curley.   

Abstract

In light of recent recommendations from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing's Baccalaureate Essentials, the Institute of Medicine's Future of Nursing, and the Carnegie Foundation's Educating Nurses, many schools of nursing are actively redesigning their undergraduate curriculums. Although the process of curricular change is a complicated one, it is also one that can generate faculty excitement, growth, and engagement. This article describes the process used to bring together the entire faculty and other stakeholders in a unique way to create a new undergraduate nursing curriculum that looks to the future and taps university and faculty strengths. The trajectory of the process and important points within that trajectory are discussed. Key products of the process, which served as articulating steps in building the final product, are also considered and how the framework translates into course work. Faculty engagement at each step resulted in a curriculum owned and endorsed by all constituents, a curriculum that breaks down the "silos" that exist not only among courses and clinical experiences but also between the undergraduate educational experience and the more complicated and contingent one of clinical practice.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Curriculum revision; Shared decision making; Undergraduate nursing program

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24267936     DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prof Nurs        ISSN: 8755-7223            Impact factor:   2.104


  3 in total

1.  Lessons in community health activism: the maternity care coalition, 1970-1990.

Authors:  Linda Maldonado
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

2.  Nursing Students as Epidemiologists: A Simulation Approach.

Authors:  Harriet Okatch; Timothy Joseph Sowicz; Helen Teng; Lucille Pilling; Monica Harmon; Christine Brewer; Alison Buttenheim
Journal:  Clin Simul Nurs       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 2.391

3.  Cognitive-behavioural reflective training for improving critical thinking disposition of nursing students.

Authors:  Godwin C Abiogu; Moses Onyemaechi Ede; John J Agah; Felix O Ugwuozor; Maduka Nweke; Nneka Nwosu; Ogechi Nnamani; Michael Eskay; Nkiru E Obande-Ogbuinya; Clifford E Ogheneakoke; Uchenna C Ugwu; Patrick Ujah; Francis O Ekwueme; M A Phil; Emmanuel I Obeagu; Chinedu I O Okeke; Damian C Ncheke; Christian Ugwuanyi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.