Literature DB >> 24267345

Metal adsorption on mosses: Toward a universal adsorption model.

A G González1, O S Pokrovsky.   

Abstract

This study quantifies the adsorption of heavy metals on 4 typical moss species used for environmental monitoring in the moss bag technique. The adsorption of Cu(2+), Cd(2+), Ni(2+), Pb(2+) and Zn(2+) onto Hypnum sp., Sphagnum sp., Pseudoscleropodium purum and Brachytecium rutabulum has been investigated using a batch reactor in a wide range of pH (1.3-11.0) and metal concentrations in solution (1.6μM-3.8mM). A Linear Programming Model (LPM) was applied for the experimental data to derive equilibrium constants and the number of surface binding sites. The surface acid-base titration performed for 4 mosses at a pH range of 3-10 in 0.1M NaNO3 demonstrated that Sphagnum sp. is the most efficient adsorbent as it has the maximal number of proton-binding sites on the surface (0.65mmol g(-1)). The pKa computed for all the moss species suggested the presence of 5 major functional groups: phosphodiester, carboxyl, phosphoryl, amine and polyphenols. The results of pH-edge experiments demonstrated that B. rutabulum exhibits the highest percentage of metal adsorption and has the highest number of available sites for most of the metals studied. However, according to the results of the constant pH "Langmuirian" isotherm, Sphagnum sp. can be considered as the strongest adsorbent, although the relative difference from other mosses is within 20%. The LPM was found to satisfactorily fit the experimental data in the full range of the studied solution parameters. The results of this study demonstrate a rather similar pattern of five metal adsorptions on mosses, both as a function of pH and as a metal concentration, which is further corroborated by similar values of adsorption constants. Therefore, despite the species and geographic differences between the mosses, a universal adsorption edge and constant pH adsorption isotherm can be recommended for 4 studied mosses. The quantitative comparison of metal adsorption with other common natural organic and inorganic materials demonstrates that mosses are among the most efficient natural adsorbents of heavy metals.
Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adsorption; Langmuirian isotherm; Metal; Moss; pH-edge

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24267345     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2013.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci        ISSN: 0021-9797            Impact factor:   8.128


  8 in total

1.  Correlating concentrations of heavy metals in atmospheric deposition with respective accumulation in moss and natural surface soil for ecological land classes in Norway between 1990 and 2010.

Authors:  Stefan Nickel; Anne Hertel; Roland Pesch; Winfried Schröder; Eiliv Steinnes; Hilde Thelle Uggerud
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  The use of vegetation, bees, and snails as important tools for the biomonitoring of atmospheric pollution-a review.

Authors:  Josephine Al-Alam; Asma Chbani; Ziad Faljoun; Maurice Millet
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Perspective of mitigating atmospheric heavy metal pollution: using mosses as biomonitoring and indicator organism.

Authors:  Biswajita Mahapatra; Nabin Kumar Dhal; Aditya Kishore Dash; Bibhu Prasad Panda; Kishore Chandra Sekhar Panigrahi; Abanti Pradhan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Chemical, molecular, and proteomic analyses of moss bag biomonitoring in a petrochemical area of Sardinia (Italy).

Authors:  Pierluigi Cortis; Candida Vannini; Annalena Cogoni; Fabrizio De Mattia; Marcella Bracale; Valerio Mezzasalma; Massimo Labra
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Silver nanoparticles impact phototrophic biofilm communities to a considerably higher degree than ionic silver.

Authors:  Aridane G González; Stéphane Mombo; Joséphine Leflaive; Alexandre Lamy; Oleg S Pokrovsky; Jean-Luc Rols
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Is Active Moss Biomonitoring Comparable to Air Filter Standard Sampling?

Authors:  Paweł Świsłowski; Arkadiusz Nowak; Stanisław Wacławek; Zbigniew Ziembik; Małgorzata Rajfur
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 7.  Responses to Cadmium in Early-Diverging Streptophytes (Charophytes and Bryophytes): Current Views and Potential Applications.

Authors:  Erika Bellini; Camilla Betti; Luigi Sanità di Toppi
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-14

8.  Clonal in vitro propagation of peat mosses (Sphagnum L.) as novel green resources for basic and applied research.

Authors:  Anna K Beike; Valeria Spagnuolo; Volker Lüth; Feray Steinhart; Julia Ramos-Gómez; Matthias Krebs; Paola Adamo; Ana Isabel Rey-Asensio; J Angel Fernández; Simonetta Giordano; Eva L Decker; Ralf Reski
Journal:  Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.711

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.