Literature DB >> 25539705

Silver nanoparticles impact phototrophic biofilm communities to a considerably higher degree than ionic silver.

Aridane G González1, Stéphane Mombo, Joséphine Leflaive, Alexandre Lamy, Oleg S Pokrovsky, Jean-Luc Rols.   

Abstract

Due to the significant increase in nanoparticle production and especially that of silver nanoparticles over the past decade, the toxicity of silver in both ionic (Ag(+)) and nanoparticulate (AgNPs) form must be studied in detail in order to understand their impact on natural ecosystems. A comparative study of the effect of AgNPs and ionic silver on two independent phototrophic biofilms was conducted in a rotating annular bioreactor (RAB) operating under constant conditions. The concentration of dissolved silver in the inlet solution was progressively increased every 4 days of exposure, from 0.1 to 100 μg L(-1). In the course of the 40-day experiment, biofilm samples were collected to determine the evolution of biomass, chlorophyll-a, as well as photosynthetic and heterotrophic enzymatic activities in response to silver addition. Analysis of both dissolved and particulate silver allowed quantification of the distribution coefficient and uptake rate constants. The presence of both AgNPs and Ag(+) produced significant changes in the biofilm structure, decreasing the relative percentage of Diatomophyceae and Cyanophyceae and increasing the relative percentage of Chlorophyceae. The accumulation capacity of the phototrophic biofilm with respect to ionic silver and the corresponding distribution coefficients were an order of magnitude higher than those of the phototrophic biofilm with respect to AgNPs. Higher levels of AgNPs decreased the biomass from 8.6 ± 0.2 mg cm(-2) for 0-10 μg L(-1) AgNPs to 6.0 ± 0.1 mg cm(-2) for 100 μg L(-1) added AgNPs, whereas ionic silver did not have any toxic effect on the biofilm growth up to 100 μg L(-1) of added Ag(+). At the same time, AgNPs did not significantly affect the photosynthetic activity of the biofilm surface communities compared to Ag(+). It can thus be hypothesized that negatively charged AgNPs may travel through the biofilm water channels, thereby affecting the whole biofilm structure. In contrast, positively charged Ag(+) is bound at the cell surfaces and EPS, thus blocking its further flux within the biofilm layers. On the whole, the phototrophic biofilm demonstrated significant capacities to accumulate silver within the surface layers. The main mechanism to avoid the toxic effects is metal complexation with exopolysaccharides and accumulation within cell walls, especially pronounced under Ag(+) stress. The significant AgNPs and Ag(+) uptake capacities of phototrophic biofilm make it a highly resistant ecosystem in silver-polluted river waters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25539705     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3978-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  44 in total

1.  Characterization of bacterial and fungal soil communities by automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis fingerprints: biological and methodological variability.

Authors:  L Ranjard; F Poly; J C Lata; C Mougel; J Thioulouse; S Nazaret
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  One-step inkjet printing of conductive silver tracks on polymer substrates.

Authors:  Jolke Perelaer; Chris E Hendriks; Antonius W M de Laat; Ulrich S Schubert
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.874

3.  Analysis of the toxic mode of action of silver nanoparticles using stress-specific bioluminescent bacteria.

Authors:  Ee Taek Hwang; Jin Hyung Lee; Yun Ju Chae; Yeon Seok Kim; Byoung Chan Kim; Byoung-In Sang; Man Bock Gu
Journal:  Small       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 13.281

4.  Mechanisms of the pH dependent generation of hydroxyl radicals and oxygen induced by Ag nanoparticles.

Authors:  Weiwei He; Yu-Ting Zhou; Wayne G Wamer; Mary D Boudreau; Jun-Jie Yin
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Binding of silver nanoparticles to bacterial proteins depends on surface modifications and inhibits enzymatic activity.

Authors:  Nicholas S Wigginton; Alexandre de Titta; Flavio Piccapietra; Jan Dobias; Victor J Nesatyy; Marc J F Suter; Rizlan Bernier-Latmani
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Zinc Oxide Nanocrystals for Non-resonant Nonlinear Optical Microscopy in Biology and Medicine.

Authors:  Aliaksandr V Kachynski; Andrey N Kuzmin; Marcin Nyk; Indrajit Roy; Paras N Prasad
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 4.126

7.  Silver nanoparticles impede the biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Kalimuthu Kalishwaralal; Selvaraj BarathManiKanth; Sureshbabu Ram Kumar Pandian; Venkataraman Deepak; Sangiliyandi Gurunathan
Journal:  Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 5.268

8.  Engineered polymeric nanoparticles for soil remediation.

Authors:  Warapong Tungittiplakorn; Leonard W Lion; Claude Cohen; Ju-Young Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Intracellular uptake: a possible mechanism for silver engineered nanoparticle toxicity to a freshwater alga Ochromonas danica.

Authors:  Ai-Jun Miao; Zhiping Luo; Chi-Shuo Chen; Wei-Chun Chin; Peter H Santschi; Antonietta Quigg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Eva Oberdörster; Jan Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  7 in total

1.  Substrate- and plant-mediated removal of citrate-coated silver nanoparticles in constructed wetlands.

Authors:  Hannele Auvinen; Viviana Vásquez Sepúlveda; Diederik P L Rousseau; Gijs Du Laing
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  A socio-scientific analysis of the environmental and health benefits as well as potential risks of cassava production and consumption.

Authors:  S Mombo; C Dumat; M Shahid; E Schreck
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Sublethal concentrations of silver nanoparticles affect the mechanical stability of biofilms.

Authors:  Alexandra Y Grün; Jutta Meier; George Metreveli; Gabriele E Schaumann; Werner Manz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Response of three biofilm-forming benthic microorganisms to Ag nanoparticles and Ag+: the diatom Nitzschia palea, the green alga Uronema confervicolum and the cyanobacteria Leptolyngbya sp.

Authors:  A G González; L Fernández-Rojo; J Leflaive; O S Pokrovsky; J-L Rols
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Zinc toxicity stimulates microbial production of extracellular polymers in a copiotrophic acid soil.

Authors:  Marc Redmile-Gordon; Lin Chen
Journal:  Int Biodeterior Biodegradation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.320

6.  Graphene-Based Nanomaterials Modulate Internal Biofilm Interactions and Microbial Diversity.

Authors:  Lauris Evariste; Paul Braylé; Florence Mouchet; Jérôme Silvestre; Laury Gauthier; Emmanuel Flahaut; Eric Pinelli; Maialen Barret
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Silver Nanoparticles, Ions, and Shape Governing Soil Microbial Functional Diversity: Nano Shapes Micro.

Authors:  Yujia Zhai; Ellard R Hunting; Marja Wouters; Willie J G M Peijnenburg; Martina G Vijver
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.