Literature DB >> 24265368

Diabetes and the course of febrile urinary tract infection.

Willize E van der Starre1, Hanneke Borgdorff, Albert M Vollaard, Nathalie M Delfos, Jan W van 't Wout, Ida C Spelt, Jeanet W Blom, Eliane M S Leyten, Ted Koster, Hans C Ablij, Jaap T van Dissel, Cees van Nieuwkoop.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24265368      PMCID: PMC3836111          DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


× No keyword cloud information.
Diabetes is considered a risk factor for acquisition of febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) (1,2), but there is a lack of information on the association of diabetes with the subsequent course of disease and its outcome. We performed a prospective observational multicenter cohort study including consecutive adults with community-onset febrile UTI presenting at 7 emergency departments and 35 primary care centers. The effect of preexisting diabetes on presentation and microbiological and clinical outcome was assessed and multivariable logistic regression performed to establish whether diabetes was an independent risk factor for a complicated course. Baseline characteristics of 858 patients presenting with febrile UTI Of 858 patients, 140 had diabetes (93% type 2 diabetes), of whom 41 (30%) used insulin, 19 (14%) were managed by diet only, and the remaining were managed by a combination of metformin, insulin, and diet. Patients with diabetes were older (median age 73 years [interquartile range {IQR} 46–78] vs. 64 [IQR 42–77], P < 0.001), were more frequently male (48 vs. 35%, P = 0.006), and had a higher rate of cardiovascular and urinary tract comorbidities (28 vs. 12%, P < 0.001, and 34 vs. 23%, P = 0.005). Clinical symptoms did not differ between diabetic and nondiabetic patients (Table 1), except that diabetic patients less frequently experienced flank pain, as reported previously (3). Escherichia coli was the most common isolated uropathogen in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Diabetes was not associated with a longer duration of fever (median 2 days in both groups) or prolonged hospital admission (both median 6 days). Patients with diabetes more often had bacteremia at presentation (30 vs. 22%, P = 0.037), intensive care unit admission (6 vs. 3%, P = 0.065), recurrent UTI (9 vs. 3%, P = 0.017), asymptomatic bacteriuria (13 vs. 9%, P = 0.247), and mortality during 30 days of follow-up (6 vs. 2%, P = 0.007). However, when adjusted for possible confounders such as underlying cardiovascular disease, diabetes was not an independent risk factor for any of these complications—bacteremia odds ratio (OR) 1.2 (95% CI 0.8–1.8), 30-day mortality OR 2.0 (0.7–5.8), recurrent UTI OR 2.2 (95% CI 0.7–6.8), and asymptomatic bacteriuria after 1 month OR 1.1 (0.5–2.5)—although women with diabetes were at increased risk of asymptomatic bacteriuria after 1 month (15 vs. 4%, P = 0.003, OR 4.3 [95% CI 1.5–11.9]). The higher prevalence of complications in patients with diabetes was mainly explained by an increased prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidity and higher age.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of 858 patients presenting with febrile UTI

Although it is widely held that patients with diabetes more often have a complicated course of infections, our prospective multicentre cohort study shows that diabetes is not independently associated with a complicated course in an unselected population of patients with febrile UTI. The prevalence of complications was higher in diabetic patients but attributable to concurrent illnesses, especially cardiovascular comorbidities, and a higher age of the diabetic population. Our study does not lend support for an increased duration of antimicrobial treatment of febrile UTI in diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients, since clinical and microbiological outcomes after 1 month did not differ significantly between both groups and diabetic and nondiabetic patients were treated alike.
  3 in total

1.  Increased risk of common infections in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  L M A J Muller; K J Gorter; E Hak; W L Goudzwaard; F G Schellevis; A I M Hoepelman; G E H M Rutten
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Predictors of urinary tract infection after menopause: a prospective study.

Authors:  Sara L Jackson; Edward J Boyko; Delia Scholes; Linn Abraham; Kalpana Gupta; Stephan D Fihn
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Community-acquired febrile urinary tract infection in diabetics could deserve a different management: a case-control study.

Authors:  J P Horcajada; I Moreno; M Velasco; J A Martínez; A Moreno-Martínez; M Barranco; J Vila; J Mensa
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 8.989

  3 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review of Literature Examining Bacterial Urinary Tract Infections in Diabetes.

Authors:  Santosh Paudel; Preeti P John; Seyedeh Leila Poorbaghi; Tara M Randis; Ritwij Kulkarni
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.061

2.  Clinical effectiveness of beta-lactams versus fluoroquinolones as empirical therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus hospitalized for urinary tract infections: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yu-Hsin Tang; Po-Liang Lu; Ho-Yin Huang; Ying-Chi Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The Predictive Value of Glycated Hemoglobin and Albumin for the Clinical Course Following Hospitalization of Patients with Febrile Urinary Tract Infection.

Authors:  Minoru Kobayashi; Toshitaka Uematsu; Gaku Nakamura; Hidetoshi Kokubun; Tomoya Mizuno; Hironori Betsunoh; Takao Kamai
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2018-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.