Literature DB >> 24264786

Variation in referral practice for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases.

A L Young1, R Adair, A Culverwell, J A Guthrie, I D Botterill, G J Toogood, J P A Lodge, K R Prasad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Half of patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases. There remains great variability between hospitals in rates of liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM). This study aimed to determine how many patients with potentially resectable CLM are not seen by specialist liver surgeons.
METHODS: Patients presenting with new CLM in a cancer network consisting of a tertiary centre and seven attached hospitals were studied prospectively over 12 months. Data were collected retrospectively for patients who did not have a complete data set. Outcomes for patients referred to the liver tertiary centre were collated. The radiology of tumours deemed inoperable by the local colorectal specialist teams was reviewed by specialist liver surgeons and radiologists.
RESULTS: In total, 631 patients with CLM were assessed. Prospective data were complete for 241 patients, and 64 (26.6 per cent) of these were referred to the specialist liver team for consideration of resection. No decision was documented for 16 patients (6.6 per cent). Of those not referred, 30 (18.6 per cent) were deemed unfit or refused and 131 (81.4 per cent) were thought inoperable. Referral rates varied between hospitals (13-43.6 per cent). Of 131 patients deemed fit but inoperable by the colorectal specialist teams, 38 (29.0 per cent) were deemed operable and 20 (15.3 per cent) had equivocal imaging when assessed retrospectively by liver specialists. In total, 142 of the 631 patients were referred to liver specialists for consideration of treatments, and 107 (75.4 per cent) treated with curative intent.
CONCLUSION: A considerable number of patients with potentially resectable CLM are not assessed by specialist liver teams. Improved referral rates could greatly improve resection rates for CLM, which may improve outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer.
© 2013 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24264786     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  8 in total

1.  Is intraoperative ultrasound still useful for the detection of colorectal cancer liver metastases?

Authors:  Guillaume Hoch; Valérie Croise-Laurent; Adeline Germain; Laurent Brunaud; Laurent Bresler; Ahmet Ayav
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Hepatic imaging response to radioembolization with yttrium-90-labeled resin microspheres for tumor progression during systemic chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Andrew S Kennedy; David S Ball; Steven J Cohen; Michael Cohn; Douglas M Coldwell; Alain Drooz; Eduardo Ehrenwald; Samir Kanani; Charles W Nutting; Fred M Moeslein; Samuel G Putnam; Steven C Rose; Michael A Savin; Sabine Schirm; Navesh K Sharma; Eric A Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12

3.  The Impact of a Hepatobiliary Multidisciplinary Team Assessment in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Jennie Engstrand; Nikolaos Kartalis; Cecilia Strömberg; Mats Broberg; Anna Stillström; Tobias Lekberg; Eduard Jonas; Jacob Freedman; Henrik Nilsson
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-05-26

Review 4.  Role of yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy in the treatment of liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer: an evidence-based expert consensus algorithm.

Authors:  D Rohan Jeyarajah; Maria B Majella Doyle; N Joseph Espat; Paul D Hansen; David A Iannitti; Joseph Kim; Thavam Thambi-Pillai; Brendan C Visser
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-04

5.  Impact of hepatobiliary service centralization on treatment and outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastases.

Authors:  A E Vallance; J vanderMeulen; A Kuryba; I D Botterill; J Hill; D G Jayne; K Walker
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Variation in the Use of Resection for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Hayley M Fenton; John C Taylor; J Peter A Lodge; Giles J Toogood; Paul J Finan; Alastair L Young; Eva J A Morris
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Hospital factors and metastatic surgery in colorectal cancer patients, a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Malin Ljunggren; Caroline E Weibull; Emma Rosander; Gabriella Palmer; Bengt Glimelius; Anna Martling; Caroline Nordenvall
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Colorectal cancer liver metastases - a population-based study on incidence, management and survival.

Authors:  Jennie Engstrand; Henrik Nilsson; Cecilia Strömberg; Eduard Jonas; Jacob Freedman
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.