Literature DB >> 24264636

Three-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with or without selective enamel etching in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions.

Esra Can Say1, Emre Özel, Haktan Yurdagüven, Mübin Soyman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective, controlled, randomized study was to evaluate the 3-year clinical performance of a two-step self-etch adhesive (AdheSE, Ivoclar Vivadent; Schaan, Liechtenstein) in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions with or without selective acid-etching of the enamel margins.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients (mean age 51.5) having at least two pairs of non-carious cervical sclerotic erosion⁄attrition⁄abfraction lesions with incisal or occlusal margins in the enamel and gingival margins in the dentin were included in the study. The two-step self-etch adhesive was applied following either the self-etch approach (AdheSE non-etch, n = 52) or a similar application approach, including prior selective acid-etching of the enamel margins (AdheSE etch, n = 52). Composite resin Point 4 (Kerr Corp; Orange, CA, USA) was used as the restorative material for all 104 restorations. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 1, 2, and 3 years, according to the modified USPHS criteria. Data were analyzed using McNemar's test (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: The retention rates for AdheSE non-etch were 100 %, 98 %, and 91.5 %; whereas, 100 %, 100 %, and 97.9 % retention rates were recorded for AdheSE etch after 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. No significant differences were detected between the retention rates, marginal adaptation at the dentin side, secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity (p > 0.05). A significantly higher number of restorations in AdheSE non-etch group showed clinically acceptable slight marginal discoloration (p = 0.0001) and clinically acceptable small marginal defects at the enamel side (p = 0.008) than in the AdheSE etch group.
CONCLUSIONS: After 3 years, the two-step self-etch adhesive exhibited acceptable clinical performance with or without selective enamel etching in non-carious cervical sclerotic lesions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Selective acid-etching of the enamel margins enhanced the performance of the two-step self-etch adhesive in terms of marginal discoloration and marginal adaptation at the enamel side.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24264636     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-1123-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  31 in total

1.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Bart Van Meerbeek; Jan De Munck; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Satoshi Inoue; Marcos Vargas; Padmini Vijay; Kirsten Van Landuyt; Paul Lambrechts; Guido Vanherle
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

2.  A 36-month evaluation of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives in noncarious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Alessandro Dourado Loguercio; Dax Dalton Bittencourt; Luiz Narciso Baratieri; Alessandra Reis
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  Contributing co-variables in clinical trials.

Authors:  S C Bayne; H O Heymann; J R Sturdevant; A D Wilder; T B Sluder
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial.

Authors:  L Sebnem Türkün; Esra Uzer Celik
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems.

Authors:  Robert L Erickson; Wayne W Barkmeier; Mark A Latta
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Roland Frankenberger; Franklin R Tay
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching.

Authors:  M Peumans; J De Munck; K L Van Landuyt; A Poitevin; P Lambrechts; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions.

Authors:  Jan W V van Dijken
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.522

9.  Selective enamel etching reconsidered: better than etch-and-rinse and self-etch?

Authors:  Roland Frankenberger; Ulrich Lohbauer; Matthias J Roggendorf; Michael Naumann; Michael Taschner
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 10.  Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review.

Authors:  Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of the photoinitiator system on the polymerization of secondary methacrylamides of systematically varied structure for dental adhesive applications.

Authors:  L M Barcelos; M G Borges; C J Soares; M S Menezes; V Huynh; M G Logan; A P P Fugolin; C S Pfeifer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Nathaniel C Lawson; Augusto Robles; Chin-Chuan Fu; Chee Paul Lin; Kanchan Sawlani; John O Burgess
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  One-year clinical evaluation of the bonding effectiveness of a one-step, self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesion therapy.

Authors:  Babacar Faye; Mouhamed Sarr; Khaly Bane; Adjaratou Wakha Aidara; Seydina Ousmane Niang; Abdoul Wakhabe Kane
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-02-25

4.  Clinical efficacy of universal adhesives for the restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  G R Ranjitha; R Vikram; N Meena; L Vijayalakshmi; Chethana S Murthy
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2020-12-04

5.  Universal Adhesives and Adhesion Modes in Non-Carious Cervical Restorations: 2-Year Randomised Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Patricia Manarte-Monteiro; Joana Domingues; Liliana Teixeira; Sandra Gavinha; Maria Conceição Manso
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  Comparison of three adhesive systems in class II composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth: Influence of Er:YAG laser conditioning and gingival margin levels on microleakage.

Authors:  Emel-Olga Onay; Kivanc Yamanel; Yonca Korkmaz-Ceyhan; Kamran Gulsahi
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-08-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.