Literature DB >> 24264238

Impact beyond the impact factor.

Günther K H Zupanc1.   

Abstract

The journal impact factor is an annually calculated number for each scientific journal, based on the average number of times its articles published in the two preceding years have been cited. It was originally devised as a tool for librarians and publishers to provide information about the citation performance of a journal as a whole, but over the last few decades it has increasingly been used to assess the quality of specific articles and the research performance of individual investigators, institutions, and countries. In addition to this clear abuse of the journal impact factor, several conceptual and technical issues limit its usability as a measure of journal reputation, especially when journals are compared across different fields. An author's decision regarding the suitability of a scholarly journal for publication should, therefore, be based on the impact that this journal makes in the field of research, rather than on the journal impact factor.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24264238     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-013-0863-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  8 in total

1.  [Publication languages of Impact Factor journals and of medical bibliographic databanks].

Authors:  G Winkmann; S Schlutius; H G Schweim
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 0.628

2.  Not-so-deep impact.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  "Science Citation Index"--A New Dimension in Indexing.

Authors:  E Garfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  How can impact factors be improved?

Authors:  E Garfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-17

5.  Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-15

6.  Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.

Authors:  E Garfield
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-11-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature.

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Show me the data.

Authors:  Mike Rossner; Heather Van Epps; Emma Hill
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 14.307

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Eigenfactor score and alternative bibliometrics surpass the impact factor in a 2-years ahead annual-citation calculation: a linear mixed design model analysis of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging journals.

Authors:  Ernesto Roldan-Valadez; Ulises Orbe-Arteaga; Camilo Rios
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Is quality and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in high impact radiology journals associated with citation rates?

Authors:  Christian B van der Pol; Matthew D F McInnes; William Petrcich; Adam S Tunis; Ramez Hanna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Damayanthi Durairajanayagam; Sindhuja Tatagari; Sandro C Esteves; Avi Harlev; Ralf Henkel; Shubhadeep Roychoudhury; Sheryl Homa; Nicolás Garrido Puchalt; Ranjith Ramasamy; Ahmad Majzoub; Kim Dao Ly; Eva Tvrda; Mourad Assidi; Kavindra Kesari; Reecha Sharma; Saleem Banihani; Edmund Ko; Muhammad Abu-Elmagd; Jaime Gosalvez; Asher Bashiri
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.