Literature DB >> 24263116

Acute effects of multisite left ventricular pacing on mechanical dyssynchrony in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

C Aldo Rinaldi1, Wolfgang Kranig, Christophe Leclercq, Salem Kacet, Tim Betts, Pierre Bordachar, Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben, Anoop Shetty, Allen Keel, Kyungmoo Ryu, Taraneh G Farazi, Marcus Simon, Tasneem Z Naqvi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A novel quadripolar left ventricular (LV) pacing lead has the ability to deliver multisite LV pacing (MSLV). We set out to characterize the safety and changes in acute mechanical dyssynchrony with MSLV in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) patients. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Prospective multicenter study in 52 patients receiving CRT. An acute pacing protocol comprising 8 MSLV configurations covering a range of delays was compared with conventional CRT (baseline). Transthoracic tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was used to measure the standard deviation of time to peak contraction of 12 LV segments (Ts-SD) and delayed longitudinal contraction. No ventricular arrhythmia occurred in any of the 52 patients. Complete TDI datasets were collected in 41 patients. Compared with baseline: 1) The mean Ts-SD was significantly lower for the optimal MSLV configuration (35.3 ± 36.4 vs 50.2 ± 29.1 ms; P < .001); 2) at least 1 MSLV configuration exhibited a significant dyssynchrony improvement in 63% of patients; and 3) the mean number of LV segments with delayed longitudinal contractions was significantly reduced with the optimal MSLV configuration (0.37 ± 7.99 vs 2.20 ± 0.19; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Acute MSLV was acutely safe, and a proportion of MSLV vectors resulted in a significant reduction in echocardiographic dyssynchrony compared with conventional CRT.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; biventricular pacing; dyssynchrony; heart failure; left ventricular pacing leads; multisite pacing

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24263116     DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2013.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Card Fail        ISSN: 1071-9164            Impact factor:   5.712


  18 in total

Review 1.  Updates in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure: Review of Multisite Pacing.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Ben Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Jessica Webb; Simon Claridge; Jonathan M Behar; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  Multisite pacing via a quadripolar lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Alexandre Bodin; Arnaud Bisson; Clémentine Andre; Bertrand Pierre; Laurent Fauchier; Dominique Babuty; Nicolas Clementy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  [Multipoint pacing-more CRT or a waste of battery power?]

Authors:  J Müller-Leisse; C Zormpas; T König; D Duncker; C Veltmann
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 4.  Multisite Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Promise and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Jonathan M Behar; Simon Claridge; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 5.  Haemodynamic Alterations Induced By Cardiac Pacing: Is Clinical Evaluation Sufficient Or Do We Need Long-Term Device Monitoring?

Authors:  Gerrit Frommeyer; Florian Reinke; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-10-31

Review 6.  Optimizing CRT - Do We Need More Leads and Delivery Methods.

Authors:  Pieter Martens; Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge; Wilfried Mullens
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

7.  Heart failure study of multipoint pacing effects on ventriculoarterial coupling: Rationale and design of the HUMVEE trial.

Authors:  Christina Chrysohoou; Polychronis Dilaveris; Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou; Ioannis Skiadas; Konstantinos Konstantinou; Konstantinos Gatzoulis; Ioannis Kallikazaros; Dimitrios Tousoulis
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 8.  Global longitudinal strain predicts responders after cardiac resynchronization therapy-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Costas Thomopoulos; Gary Tse; Konstantinos Tsioufis; Petros Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  Rationale and design of a randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The MPP Trial.

Authors:  Gery Tomassoni; James Baker; Raffaele Corbisiero; Charles Love; David Martin; Robert Sheppard; Seth J Worley; Kwangdeok Lee; Imran Niazi
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 1.468

10.  Improvement in acute contractility and hemodynamics with multipoint pacing via a left ventricular quadripolar pacing lead.

Authors:  C Aldo Rinaldi; Christophe Leclercq; Wolfgang Kranig; Salem Kacet; Tim Betts; Pierre Bordachar; Klaus-Jürgen Gutleben; Anoop Shetty; Erwan Donal; Allen Keel; Kyungmoo Ryu; Taraneh G Farazi; Marcus Simon; Tasneem Z Naqvi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.