Literature DB >> 24262878

Fellowship learning curve associated with completing a robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Samith Sandadi1, Jill A Gadzinski1, Stephen Lee1, Dennis S Chi2, Yukio Sonoda2, Elizabeth L Jewell2, Carol L Brown2, Ginger J Gardner2, Richard R Barakat2, Mario M Leitao3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the learning curve associated with training fellows in completing robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomies.
METHODS: All patients scheduled to undergo a robotic procedure at our institution from 5/15/07 to 5/22/12 were identified. Fellow participation per procedure was documented. The learning curve of fellows for the time to complete a hysterectomy (from initiation of developing the retroperitoneal space to the completion of the colpotomy) was analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the 1754 planned robotic cases, 1626 were completed robotically and 128 were converted to laparotomy. Fifty-seven fellows participated in 99.7% of the cases. Eleven gynecologic oncology fellows completed at least 1 robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. From 7/7/08 to 5/21/12, 981 hysterectomies were completed robotically, 254 of these (25.9%) by the 11 fellows. Prior to completing a hysterectomy, the median number of hysterectomies in which a fellow participated was 16 (range, 11-40). Median amount of time for a fellow to complete a hysterectomy decreased from 60 min in 2009 (N=27 cases) to 31 min in 2011 (N=148 cases). Based on the recorded completion times in which the 11 fellows completed a hysterectomy, it required ~33 cases per fellow to be able to perform the hysterectomy and overcome the learning curve.
CONCLUSIONS: The learning curve associated with hysterectomy requires completion of ~33 cases by the fellow after an initial median experience of 16 cases. Our data suggest that a minimum of 50 total cases is required during fellowship to complete a robotic hysterectomy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy; Total laparoscopic hysterectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24262878     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  8 in total

1.  Make New Friends But Keep the Old: Minimally Invasive Surgery Training in Gynecologic Oncology Fellowship Programs.

Authors:  Kari L Ring; Pedro T Ramirez; Lesley B Conrad; William Burke; R Wendel Naumann; Mark F Munsell; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Validity evidence for procedural competency in virtual reality robotic simulation, establishing a credible pass/fail standard for the vaginal cuff closure procedure.

Authors:  Lisette Hvid Hovgaard; Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen; Lars Konge; Torur Dalsgaard; Christian Rifbjerg Larsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Pedagogic Approach in the Surgical Learning: The First Period of "Assistant Surgeon" May Improve the Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Angeline Favre; Stephanie Huberlant; Marie Carbonnel; Julie Goetgheluck; Aurelie Revaux; Jean Marc Ayoubi
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-11-02

4.  Recommendations for a standardised educational program in robot assisted gynaecological surgery: Consensus from the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS).

Authors:  P Rusch; T Ind; R Kimmig; A Maggioni; J Ponce; V Zanagnolo; P J Coronado; J Verguts; E Lambaudie; H Falconer; J W Collins; Rhm Verheijen
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2019-03

5.  Robot-Assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Different Classes of Obesity: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ilse Haveman; Willem Jan van Weelden; Elisabeth A Roovers; Arjan A Kraayenbrink; F Paul H L J Dijkhuizen
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.789

6.  Survival in endometrial cancer in relation to minimally invasive surgery or open surgery - a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study.

Authors:  Christer Borgfeldt; Erik Holmberg; Janusz Marcickiewicz; Karin Stålberg; Bengt Tholander; Elisabeth Åvall Lundqvist; Angelique Flöter-Rådestad; Maria Bjurberg; Pernilla Dahm-Kähler; Kristina Hellman; Elisabet Hjerpe; Preben Kjölhede; Per Rosenberg; Thomas Högberg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  Robotic Surgery in Gynecology.

Authors:  Jean Bouquet de Joliniere; Armando Librino; Jean-Bernard Dubuisson; Fathi Khomsi; Nordine Ben Ali; Anis Fadhlaoui; J M Ayoubi; Anis Feki
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-05-02

8.  Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy; comparison of early surgical outcomes

Authors:  Özgüç Takmaz; Mete Güngör
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2020-06-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.