Literature DB >> 34078319

Survival in endometrial cancer in relation to minimally invasive surgery or open surgery - a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study.

Christer Borgfeldt1, Erik Holmberg2, Janusz Marcickiewicz3, Karin Stålberg4, Bengt Tholander5, Elisabeth Åvall Lundqvist6, Angelique Flöter-Rådestad7, Maria Bjurberg8, Pernilla Dahm-Kähler9, Kristina Hellman10, Elisabet Hjerpe11, Preben Kjölhede12, Per Rosenberg6, Thomas Högberg13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze overall survival in endometrial cancer patients' FIGO stages I-III in relation to surgical approach; minimally invasive (MIS) or open surgery (laparotomy).
METHODS: A population-based retrospective study of 7275 endometrial cancer patients included in the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecologic Cancer diagnosed from 2010 to 2018. Cox proportional hazard models were used in univariable and multivariable survival analyses.
RESULTS: In univariable analysis open surgery was associated with worse overall survival compared with MIS hazard ratio, HR, 1.39 (95% CI 1.18-1.63) while in the multivariable analysis, surgical approach (MIS vs open surgery) was not associated with overall survival after adjustment for known risk factors (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.95-1.32). Higher FIGO stage, non-endometrioid histology, non-diploid tumors, lymphovascular space invasion and increasing age were independent risk factors for overall survival.
CONCLUSION: The minimal invasive or open surgical approach did not show any impact on survival for patients with endometrial cancer stages I-III when known prognostic risk factors were included in the multivariable analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial cancer; Minimally invasive surgery; Risk factors; Survival

Year:  2021        PMID: 34078319     DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08289-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


  24 in total

1.  High cardiovascular disease mortality after endometrial cancer diagnosis: Results from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.

Authors:  Ashley S Felix; Julie K Bower; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Subha V Raman; David E Cohn; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Data quality in the Swedish Quality Register of Gynecologic Cancer - a Swedish Gynecologic Cancer Group (SweGCG) study.

Authors:  Per Rosenberg; Preben Kjølhede; Christian Staf; Maria Bjurberg; Christer Borgfeldt; Pernilla Dahm-Kähler; Kristina Hellman; Elisabet Hjerpe; Erik Holmberg; Karin Stålberg; Bengt Tholander; Elisabeth Åvall Lundqvist; Thomas Högberg
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Recurrence and survival after random assignment to laparoscopy versus laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group LAP2 Study.

Authors:  Joan L Walker; Marion R Piedmonte; Nick M Spirtos; Scott M Eisenkop; John B Schlaerth; Robert S Mannel; Richard Barakat; Michael L Pearl; Sudarshan K Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sahar Salehi; Elisabeth Åvall-Lundqvist; Berit Legerstam; Joseph W Carlson; Henrik Falconer
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free Survival Among Women With Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Monika Janda; Val Gebski; Lucy C Davies; Peta Forder; Alison Brand; Russell Hogg; Thomas W Jobling; Russell Land; Tom Manolitsas; Marcelo Nascimento; Deborah Neesham; James L Nicklin; Martin K Oehler; Geoff Otton; Lewis Perrin; Stuart Salfinger; Ian Hammond; Yee Leung; Peter Sykes; Hextan Ngan; Andrea Garrett; Michael Laney; Tong Yow Ng; Karfai Tam; Karen Chan; C David Wrede; Selvan Pather; Bryony Simcock; Rhonda Farrell; Gregory Robertson; Graeme Walker; Nigel R Armfield; Nick Graves; Anthony J McCartney; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Robotic vs Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer in Elderly Patients: Surgical Outcome, Survival, and Cost Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Lindfors; Åsa Åkesson; Christian Staf; Per Sjöli; Karin Sundfeldt; Pernilla Dahm-Kähler
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  A population-based registry study evaluating surgery in newly diagnosed uterine cancer.

Authors:  Christer Borgfeldt; Grigorios Kalapotharakos; Katrin C Asciutto; Mats Löfgren; Thomas Högberg
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Melamed; Daniel J Margul; Ling Chen; Nancy L Keating; Marcela G Del Carmen; Junhua Yang; Brandon-Luke L Seagle; Amy Alexander; Emma L Barber; Laurel W Rice; Jason D Wright; Masha Kocherginsky; Shohreh Shahabi; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Michael Frumovitz; Rene Pareja; Aldo Lopez; Marcelo Vieira; Reitan Ribeiro; Alessandro Buda; Xiaojian Yan; Yao Shuzhong; Naven Chetty; David Isla; Mariano Tamura; Tao Zhu; Kristy P Robledo; Val Gebski; Rebecca Asher; Vanessa Behan; James L Nicklin; Robert L Coleman; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Comparison of robotic surgery with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Longke Ran; Jing Jin; Yan Xu; Youquan Bu; Fangzhou Song
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.