OBJECTIVES: To provide a standardized metric for the assessment of depression severity to enable comparability among results of established depression measures. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A common metric for 11 depression questionnaires was developed applying item response theory (IRT) methods. Data of 33,844 adults were used for secondary analysis including routine assessments of 23,817 in- and outpatients with mental and/or medical conditions (46% with depressive disorders) and a general population sample of 10,027 randomly selected participants from three representative German household surveys. RESULTS: A standardized metric for depression severity was defined by 143 items, and scores were normed to a general population mean of 50 (standard deviation = 10) for easy interpretability. It covers the entire range of depression severity assessed by established instruments. The metric allows comparisons among included measures. Large differences were found in their measurement precision and range, providing a rationale for instrument selection. Published scale-specific threshold scores of depression severity showed remarkable consistencies across different questionnaires. CONCLUSION: An IRT-based instrument-independent metric for depression severity enables direct comparisons among established measures. The "common ruler" simplifies the interpretation of depression assessment by identifying key thresholds for clinical and epidemiologic decision making and facilitates integrative psychometric research across studies, including meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES: To provide a standardized metric for the assessment of depression severity to enable comparability among results of established depression measures. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A common metric for 11 depression questionnaires was developed applying item response theory (IRT) methods. Data of 33,844 adults were used for secondary analysis including routine assessments of 23,817 in- and outpatients with mental and/or medical conditions (46% with depressive disorders) and a general population sample of 10,027 randomly selected participants from three representative German household surveys. RESULTS: A standardized metric for depression severity was defined by 143 items, and scores were normed to a general population mean of 50 (standard deviation = 10) for easy interpretability. It covers the entire range of depression severity assessed by established instruments. The metric allows comparisons among included measures. Large differences were found in their measurement precision and range, providing a rationale for instrument selection. Published scale-specific threshold scores of depression severity showed remarkable consistencies across different questionnaires. CONCLUSION: An IRT-based instrument-independent metric for depression severity enables direct comparisons among established measures. The "common ruler" simplifies the interpretation of depression assessment by identifying key thresholds for clinical and epidemiologic decision making and facilitates integrative psychometric research across studies, including meta-analysis.
Authors: H Felix Fischer; Inka Wahl; Sandra Nolte; Gregor Liegl; Elmar Brähler; Bernd Löwe; Matthias Rose Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2016-10-16 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: H Felix Fischer; Cassandra Klug; Koosje Roeper; Eva Blozik; Frank Edelmann; Marion Eisele; Stefan Störk; Rolf Wachter; Martin Scherer; Matthias Rose; Christoph Herrmann-Lingen Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-12-14 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Felix Fischer; Chris Gibbons; Joël Coste; Jose M Valderas; Matthias Rose; Alain Leplège Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Bryce B Reeve; David Thissen; Darren A DeWalt; I-Chan Huang; Yang Liu; Brooke Magnus; Hally Quinn; Heather E Gross; Pamela A Kisala; Pengsheng Ni; Stephen Haley; M J Mulcahey; Susie Charlifue; Robin A Hanks; Mary Slavin; Alan Jette; David S Tulsky Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Kurt Kroenke; Timothy E Stump; Chen X Chen; Jacob Kean; Matthew J Bair; Teresa M Damush; Erin E Krebs; Patrick O Monahan Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2020-01-23 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Johanna Klinger-König; Johannes Hertel; Sandra Van der Auwera; Stefan Frenzel; Liliane Pfeiffer; Melanie Waldenberger; Janine Golchert; Alexander Teumer; Matthias Nauck; Georg Homuth; Henry Völzke; Hans J Grabe Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Alden L Gross; Melinda C Power; Marilyn S Albert; Jennifer A Deal; Rebecca F Gottesman; Michael Griswold; Lisa M Wruck; Thomas H Mosley; Josef Coresh; A Richey Sharrett; Karen Bandeen-Roche Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 4.822