Literature DB >> 24261367

Comparative analysis of Medicare spending for medical imaging: sustained dramatic slowdown compared with other services.

David W Lee1, Richard Duszak, Danny R Hughes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess trends in Medicare spending growth for medical imaging relative to other services and the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We calculated per-beneficiary Part B Medicare medical imaging expenditures for three-digit Berenson-Eggers Type of Service (BETOS) categories using Physician Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files for 32 million beneficiaries from 2000 to 2011. We adjusted BETOS categories to address changes in coding and payment policy and excluded categories with 2011 aggregate spending less than $500 million. We computed and ranked compound annual growth rates over three periods: pre-DRA (2000-2005), DRA transition period (2005-2007), and post-DRA (2007-2011).
RESULTS: Forty-four modified BETOS categories fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Between 2000 and 2006, Medicare outlays for nonimaging services grew by 6.8% versus 12.0% for imaging services. In the ensuing 5 years, annual growth in spending for nonimaging continued at 3.6% versus a decline of 3.5% for imaging. Spending growth for all services during the pre-DRA, DRA, and post-DRA periods were 7.8%, 3.8%, and 2.9 compared with 15.0%, -3.4%, and -2.2% for advanced imaging services. Advanced imaging was among the fastest growing categories of Medicare services in the early 2000s but was in the bottom 2% of spending categories in 2011. Between 2007 and 2011, the fastest growing service categories were evaluation and management services with other specialists (29.1%), nursing home visits (11.2%), anesthesia (9.1%), and other ambulatory procedures (9.0%).
CONCLUSION: Slowing volume growth and massive Medicare payment cuts have left medical imaging near the bottom of all service categories contributing to growth in Medicare spending.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24261367     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.10999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

Review 1.  The Empirical Foundations of Teleradiology and Related Applications: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; James H Thrall; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  MDCT diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in the emergent setting.

Authors:  Nainesh Parikh; Elizabeth Morris; James Babb; Maj Wickstrom; John McMenamy; Rahul Sharma; David Schwartz; Mark Lifshitz; Danny Kim
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09

Review 3.  Automated Protocoling for MRI Exams-Challenges and Solutions.

Authors:  Jonas Denck; Oliver Haas; Jens Guehring; Andreas Maier; Eva Rothgang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.903

4.  Value of MRI in medicine: More than just another test?

Authors:  Edwin J R van Beek; Christiane Kuhl; Yoshimi Anzai; Patricia Desmond; Richard L Ehman; Qiyong Gong; Garry Gold; Vikas Gulani; Margaret Hall-Craggs; Tim Leiner; C C Tschoyoson Lim; James G Pipe; Scott Reeder; Caroline Reinhold; Marion Smits; Daniel K Sodickson; Clare Tempany; H Alberto Vargas; Meiyun Wang
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Use of Health Information Exchange and Repeat Imaging Costs.

Authors:  Hye-Young Jung; Joshua R Vest; Mark A Unruh; Lisa M Kern; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Kidney Cancer Incidence in California: End of the Trend?

Authors:  Cyllene R Morris; Primo N Lara; Arti Parikh-Patel; Kenneth W Kizer
Journal:  Kidney Cancer       Date:  2017-07-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.