| Literature DB >> 24260702 |
Marcello Mezzasalma1, Fabio Maria Guarino, Gennaro Aprea, Angelica Crottini, Gaetano Odierna.
Abstract
A karyological analysis on six Italian populations the slow worm (Anguis veronensis Pollini, 1818) was performed and their genetic differentiation at the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene fragment from a Spanish sample has been assessed. The Italian populations were karyologically uniform, all showing 2n=44 elements, of which 20 were macrochromosomes and 24 microchromosomes. Comparison with literature data on Central European populations showed a difference on the morphology of the 10(th) chromosome pair: submetacentric in Italian populations and telocentric in the Central European ones. Our analysis showed the presence of a fragile site on chromosomes of this pair, suggesting its propensity for structural rearrangements. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene fragment showed uniformity among Italian populations (uncorrected genetic distance of 0.4%), and their genetic distinctness from the Spanish individual (uncorrected genetic distance of 4.2%). Our results confirm the existence of two different Anguis fragilis Linnaeus, 1758 lineages, each one characterized by a different cytotype.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; Anguis; Italian Peninsula; Karyotype; chromosome banding
Year: 2013 PMID: 24260702 PMCID: PMC3833742 DOI: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v7i3.5398
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comp Cytogenet ISSN: 1993-0771 Impact factor: 1.800
Figure 1.70%-majority consensus tree derived from a Bayesian inference analysis of 321 bp of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene. was used as outgroup. Sequences retrieved from GenBank are marked with their accession numbers.
Figure 2.A Giemsa stained karyotype of an individual from Valle Agricola B Ag-NOR-banding stained metaphase plate of an individual from Ruvo del Monte C, D, E metaphase plate of an individual from Valle Agricola stained with C-banding (C) and C-Banding+ CMA3 (D)+ DAPI (E). Arrows in (B) point at NOR loci.
Chromosome relative length (RL), centromeric index (CI) and chromosome shape (CS) of studied samples of . The values of RL and CI are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Chromosome morphology was measured according to Levan et al. (1964). For the microchromosomes 11–22 only their complessive RL value is provided.
| 15,2 ± 3,5 | 0,45 ± 3,6 | metacentric | |
| 11,7 ± 2,7 | 0,10 ± 3,8 | telocentric | |
| 9,7 ± 3,3 | 0,08 ± 4,4 | telocentric | |
| 7,6 ± 3,1 | 0,07 ± 3,5 | telocentric | |
| 7,4 ± 3,4 | 0,42 ± 3,6 | metacentric | |
| 7,1 ± 3,1 | 0,07 ± 4,1 | telocentric | |
| 6,2 ± 3,1 | 0,10 ± 3,1 | telocentric | |
| 5,7 ± 2,8 | 0,08 ± 2,9 | telocentric | |
| 5,1 ± 2,7 | 0,07 ± 4,0 | telocentric | |
| 4,6 ± 3,2 | 0,34 ± 3,8 | submetacentric | |
| 19,7 ± 6,8 | – | – |
Figure 3.Karyotypes of a male from Travacò Siccomario (A) and of female from Ruvo del Monte (B) stained with G-banding and replication pattern, respectively. The arrow in (B) points at a fragile site.