Literature DB >> 24259753

Phase II trial design with Bayesian adaptive randomization and predictive probability.

Guosheng Yin1, Nan Chen, J Jack Lee.   

Abstract

We propose a randomized phase II clinical trial design based on Bayesian adaptive randomization and predictive probability monitoring. Adaptive randomization assigns more patients to a more efficacious treatment arm by comparing the posterior probabilities of efficacy between different arms. We continuously monitor the trial by using the predictive probability. The trial is terminated early when it is shown that one treatment is overwhelmingly superior to others or that all the treatments are equivalent. We develop two methods to compute the predictive probability by considering the uncertainty of the sample size of the future data. We illustrate the proposed Bayesian adaptive randomization and predictive probability design by using a phase II lung cancer clinical trial, and we conduct extensive simulation studies to examine the operating characteristics of the design. By coupling adaptive randomization and predictive probability approaches, the trial can treat more patients with a more efficacious treatment and allow for early stopping whenever sufficient information is obtained to conclude treatment superiority or equivalence. The design proposed also controls both the type I and the type II errors and offers an alternative Bayesian approach to the frequentist group sequential design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adaptive randomization; Bayesian inference; Clinical trial ethics; Group sequential method; Posterior predictive distribution; Randomized trial; Type I error; Type II error

Year:  2012        PMID: 24259753      PMCID: PMC3832255          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2011.01006.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat        ISSN: 0035-9254            Impact factor:   1.864


  19 in total

1.  Adaptive clinical trials: the promise and the caution.

Authors:  Donald A Berry
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Optimising the design of phase II oncology trials: the importance of randomisation.

Authors:  Mark J Ratain; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  A predictive probability design for phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  J Jack Lee; Diane D Liu
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Selection and bias--two hostile brothers.

Authors:  Peter Bauer; Franz Koenig; Werner Brannath; Martin Posch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

6.  Reducing the number of inferior treatments in clinical trials.

Authors:  B J Flehinger; T A Louis; H Robbins; B H Singer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials.

Authors:  P C O'Brien; T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Outcome--adaptive randomization: is it useful?

Authors:  Edward L Korn; Boris Freidlin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  A group sequential, response-adaptive design for randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Theodore G Karrison; Dezheng Huo; Rick Chappell
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2003-10
View more
  15 in total

1.  A hybrid phase I-II/III clinical trial design allowing dose re-optimization in phase III.

Authors:  Andrew G Chapple; Peter F Thall
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Adaptive clinical trial designs in oncology.

Authors:  Yong Zang; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12

3.  A multi-source adaptive platform design for testing sequential combinatorial therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Alexander M Kaizer; Brian P Hobbs; Joseph S Koopmeiners
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Simulation study for evaluating the performance of response-adaptive randomization.

Authors:  Yining Du; Xuan Wang; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Time-trend impact on treatment estimation in two-arm clinical trials with a binary outcome and Bayesian response adaptive randomization.

Authors:  Yunyun Jiang; Wenle Zhao; Valerie Durkalski-Mauldin
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 1.051

6.  Subgroup-Based Adaptive (SUBA) Designs for Multi-Arm Biomarker Trials.

Authors:  Yanxun Xu; Lorenzo Trippa; Peter Müller; Yuan Ji
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2014-07-17

7.  Controlled multi-arm platform design using predictive probability.

Authors:  Brian P Hobbs; Nan Chen; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Unified exact design with early stopping rules for single arm clinical trials with multiple endpoints.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Denise Esserman; Michael Kane; Daniel Zelterman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  The use of local and nonlocal priors in Bayesian test-based monitoring for single-arm phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  Yanhong Zhou; Ruitao Lin; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 1.234

10.  Design and analysis of biomarker-integrated clinical trials with adaptive threshold detection and flexible patient enrichment.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Xiaofei Wang; Stephen L George; Haibo Zhou
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 1.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.