Literature DB >> 24258854

Prognosis of patients with melanoma and microsatellitosis undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Edmund K Bartlett1, Meera Gupta, Jashodeep Datta, Phyllis A Gimotty, DuPont Guerry, Xiaowei Xu, David E Elder, Brian J Czerniecki, Douglas L Fraker, Giorgos C Karakousis.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Melanoma microsatellitosis is classified as stage IIIB/C disease and is associated with a poor prognosis. Prognostic factors within this group, however, have not been well characterized.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1,621 patients undergoing sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy at our institution (1996-2011) to compare patients with (n = 98) and patients without (n = 1,523) microsatellites. Univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with SLN positivity and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) in patients with microsatellites.
RESULTS: Patients with microsatellites were older and had lesions with higher Clark level and greater thickness that more frequently had mitoses, ulceration, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (all p < 0.0001). In microsatellite patients, the SLN positivity rate was 43 %. Lesional ulceration (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.5-8.6), absent tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (OR = 2.8, 95 % CI 1.1-7.1), and LVI (OR = 3.3, 95 % CI 1.7-10) were significantly associated with SLN positivity by multivariate analysis. With a median follow-up of 4.5 years in survivors, ulceration (hazards ratio [HR] = 3.4, 95 % CI 1.5-7.8) and >1 metastatic LN (HR = 2.7, 95 % CI 1.1-6.6) were significantly associated with decreased MSS by multivariate analysis. In patients without these prognostic factors, the 5-year MSS was 90 % (n = 49) compared with 50 % (n = 23) among patients with ulceration only, 51 % (n = 12) in those with >1 metastatic LN only, or 25 % in those with both (n = 14, p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Microsatellitosis was frequently associated with multiple adverse pathologic features. In the absence of ulceration and >1 metastatic LN; however, the outcome for patients with microsatellites compared favorably to stage IIIB patients overall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24258854      PMCID: PMC4001246          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3388-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  23 in total

1.  The risk of in-transit melanoma metastasis depends on tumor biology and not the surgical approach to regional lymph nodes.

Authors:  Timothy M Pawlik; Merrick I Ross; John F Thompson; Alexander M M Eggermont; Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The role of microsatellites as a prognostic factor in primary malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Ladan Shaikh; Richard W Sagebiel; Carlos M M Ferreira; Mehdi Nosrati; James R Miller; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  2005-06

3.  Microscopic satellites around a primary melanoma: another piece of the puzzle in melanoma staging.

Authors:  Charles M Balch
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  The prognostic implications of microscopic satellites in patients with clinical stage I melanoma.

Authors:  P León; J M Daly; M Synnestvedt; D J Schultz; D E Elder; W H Clark
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1991-12

5.  Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors among 2,313 patients with stage III melanoma: comparison of nodal micrometastases versus macrometastases.

Authors:  Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Seng-Jaw Soong; John F Thompson; Shouluan Ding; David R Byrd; Natale Cascinelli; Alistair J Cochran; Daniel G Coit; Alexander M Eggermont; Timothy Johnson; John M Kirkwood; Stanley P Leong; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Merrick I Ross; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Mitotic rate as a predictor of sentinel lymph node positivity in patients with thin melanomas.

Authors:  Susan B Kesmodel; Giorgos C Karakousis; Jeffrey D Botbyl; Robert J Canter; Robert T Lewis; Peter M Wahl; Kyla P Terhune; Abass Alavi; David E Elder; Michael E Ming; DuPont Guerry; Phyllis A Gimotty; Douglas L Fraker; Brian J Czerniecki; Francis R Spitz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Sentinel-node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma.

Authors:  Donald L Morton; John F Thompson; Alistair J Cochran; Nicola Mozzillo; Robert Elashoff; Richard Essner; Omgo E Nieweg; Daniel F Roses; Harald J Hoekstra; Constantine P Karakousis; Douglas S Reintgen; Brendon J Coventry; Edwin C Glass; He-Jing Wang
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prognostic factors in localized invasive cutaneous melanoma: high value of mitotic rate, vascular invasion and microscopic satellitosis.

Authors:  Eduardo Nagore; Vicente Oliver; Rafael Botella-Estrada; Salvador Moreno-Picot; Amelia Insa; José M Fortea
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Microscopic satellitosis in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma: implications for nodal basin staging.

Authors:  Troy F Kimsey; T Cohen; A Patel; K J Busam; M S Brady
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification.

Authors:  Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Seng-Jaw Soong; John F Thompson; Michael B Atkins; David R Byrd; Antonio C Buzaid; Alistair J Cochran; Daniel G Coit; Shouluan Ding; Alexander M Eggermont; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; John M Kirkwood; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Merrick I Ross; Arthur J Sober; Vernon K Sondak
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Is Prognostic in Thickest Melanoma Cases and Should Be Performed for Thick Melanomas.

Authors:  Dale Han; Gang Han; Monica T Duque; Steven Morrison; Stanley P Leong; Mohammed Kashani-Sabet; John Vetto; Richard White; Schlomo Schneebaum; Barbara Pockaj; Nicola Mozzillo; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Surveillance of Sentinel Node-Positive Melanoma Patients with Reasons for Exclusion from MSLT-II: Multi-Institutional Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Kristy K Broman; Tasha M Hughes; Lesly A Dossett; James Sun; Michael J Carr; Dennis A Kirichenko; Avinash Sharma; Edmund K Bartlett; Amanda Ag Nijhuis; John F Thompson; Tina J Hieken; Lisa Kottschade; Jennifer Downs; David E Gyorki; Emma Stahlie; Alexander van Akkooi; David W Ollila; Jill Frank; Yun Song; Giorgos Karakousis; Marc Moncrieff; Jenny Nobes; John Vetto; Dale Han; Jeffrey Farma; Jeremiah L Deneve; Martin D Fleming; Matthew Perez; Kirsten Baecher; Michael Lowe; Roger Olofsson Bagge; Jan Mattsson; Ann Y Lee; Russell S Berman; Harvey Chai; Hidde M Kroon; Roland M Teras; Juri Teras; Norma E Farrow; Georgia M Beasley; Jane Yc Hui; Lukas Been; Schelto Kruijff; David Boulware; Amod A Sarnaik; Vernon K Sondak; Jonathan S Zager
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 6.532

Review 3.  Essential Components of Melanoma Histopathological Reporting: The Surgical Oncologist's Perspective.

Authors:  Vinka Nurdjaja; Masato Yozu; Jon A Mathy
Journal:  J Skin Cancer       Date:  2018-05-02

4.  Predictive Values of Pathological and Clinical Risk Factors for Positivity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Thin Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hanzi Huang; Ziyao Fu; Jiang Ji; Jiuzuo Huang; Xiao Long
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.