Literature DB >> 24258271

Evolution of the empirical and theoretical foundations of eyewitness identification reform.

Steven E Clark1, Molly B Moreland, Scott D Gronlund.   

Abstract

Scientists in many disciplines have begun to raise questions about the evolution of research findings over time (Ioannidis in Epidemiology, 19, 640-648, 2008; Jennions & Møller in Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences, 269, 43-48, 2002; Mullen, Muellerleile, & Bryan in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1450-1462, 2001; Schooler in Nature, 470, 437, 2011), since many phenomena exhibit decline effects-reductions in the magnitudes of effect sizes as empirical evidence accumulates. The present article examines empirical and theoretical evolution in eyewitness identification research. For decades, the field has held that there are identification procedures that, if implemented by law enforcement, would increase eyewitness accuracy, either by reducing false identifications, with little or no change in correct identifications, or by increasing correct identifications, with little or no change in false identifications. Despite the durability of this no-cost view, it is unambiguously contradicted by data (Clark in Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 238-259, 2012a; Clark & Godfrey in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 22-42, 2009; Clark, Moreland, & Rush, 2013; Palmer & Brewer in Law and Human Behavior, 36, 247-255, 2012), raising questions as to how the no-cost view became well-accepted and endured for so long. Our analyses suggest that (1) seminal studies produced, or were interpreted as having produced, the no-cost pattern of results; (2) a compelling theory was developed that appeared to account for the no-cost pattern; (3) empirical results changed over the years, and subsequent studies did not reliably replicate the no-cost pattern; and (4) the no-cost view survived despite the accumulation of contradictory empirical evidence. Theories of memory that were ruled out by early data now appear to be supported by data, and the theory developed to account for early data now appears to be incorrect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24258271     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0516-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  32 in total

1.  Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution.

Authors:  Michael D Jennions; Anders P Møller
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Probative value of absolute and relative judgments in eyewitness identification.

Authors:  Steven E Clark; Michael A Erickson; Jesse Breneman
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2011-10

Review 3.  Why most discovered true associations are inflated.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Clarkian Logic on Trial.

Authors:  Eryn J Newman; Elizabeth F Loftus
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-05

5.  Eyewitness Identifications: One More Lesson on the Costs of Excluding Relevant Evidence.

Authors:  Larry Laudan
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-05

6.  Costs and Benefits of Eyewitness Identification Reform: Psychological Science and Public Policy.

Authors:  Steven E Clark
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-05

7.  Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?

Authors:  Harold Pashler; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-11

8.  Eyewitness Identification Reform: Data, Theory, and Due Process.

Authors:  Steven E Clark
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-05

9.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis of eyewitness memory: comparing the diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous versus sequential lineups.

Authors:  Laura Mickes; Heather D Flowe; John T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2012-12

10.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

View more
  5 in total

1.  Why eyewitnesses fail.

Authors:  Thomas D Albright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Relative judgment theory and the mediation of facial recognition: Implications for theories of eyewitness identification.

Authors:  Ryan M McAdoo; Scott D Gronlund
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-11-05

3.  Lineup fairness: propitious heterogeneity and the diagnostic feature-detection hypothesis.

Authors:  Curt A Carlson; Alyssa R Jones; Jane E Whittington; Robert F Lockamyeir; Maria A Carlson; Alex R Wooten
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-06-13

4.  The impact of fillers on lineup performance.

Authors:  Stacy A Wetmore; Ryan M McAdoo; Scott D Gronlund; Jeffrey S Neuschatz
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2017-11-22

5.  Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?

Authors:  Matthew Kaesler; John C Dunn; Keith Ransom; Carolyn Semmler
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-08-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.