Literature DB >> 24258205

A cost comparison of laparoscopic and open colon surgery in a publicly funded academic institution.

Krista M Hardy1, Josephine Kwong, Kristen B Pitzul, Ashley S Vergis, Timothy D Jackson, David R Urbach, Allan Okrainec.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the total hospital cost of laparoscopic (lap) and open colon surgery at a publicly funded academic institution.
METHODS: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or open colon surgery for all indications at the University Health Network, Toronto, Canada, from April 2004 to March 2009 were included. Patient demographic, operative, and outcome data were reviewed retrospectively. Hospital costs were determined from the Ontario Case Costing Initiative, adjusted for inflation, and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Linear regression was used to analyze the relationship between length of stay and total hospital cost.
RESULTS: There were 391 elective colon resections (223 lap/168 open, 15.4 % conversion). There was no difference in median age, gender, or Charlson score. Body mass index was slightly higher for laparoscopic surgery (27.5/25.9 lap/open; p = 0.008), while the American Society of Anesthesiologists score was slightly higher for open surgery. Median operative time was greater for laparoscopic surgery (224/196 min, lap/open; p = 0.001). There was no difference in complication rates (21.6/22.5 % lap/open; p = 0.900), reoperations (5.8/6.5 % lap/open; p = 0.833) or 30-day readmissions (7.6/12.5 % lap/open; p = 0.122). Number of emergency room visits was greater with open surgery (12.6/20.8 % lap/open; p = 0.037). Operative cost was higher for laparoscopic surgery ($4,171.37/3,489.29 lap/open; p = 0.001), while total hospital cost was significantly reduced ($9,600.22/12,721.41 lap/open; p = 0.001). Median length of stay was shorter for laparoscopic surgery (5/7 days lap/open; p = 0.000), and this correlated directly with hospital cost.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colon surgery is associated with increased operative costs but significantly lower total hospital costs. The cost savings is related, in part, to reduced length of stay with laparoscopic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24258205     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3311-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  47 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Abraham; J M Young; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Stefan Maartense; Michalda S Dunker; J Frederick Slors; Miguel A Cuesta; Dirk J Gouma; Sander J van Deventer; Ad A van Bodegraven; Willem A Bemelman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Duepree; Anthony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore; Hans J Duepree; Conor P Delaney; Sharmilla Dissanaike; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Minimally invasive surgery is underutilized for colon cancer.

Authors:  Celia N Robinson; G John Chen; Courtney J Balentine; Shubhada Sansgiry; Christy L Marshall; Daniel A Anaya; Avo Artinyan; Daniel Albo; David H Berger
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study.

Authors:  N Pokala; C P Delaney; A J Senagore; K M Brady; V W Fazio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group.

Authors:  J W Fleshman; H Nelson; W R Peters; H C Kim; S Larach; R R Boorse; W Ambroze; P Leggett; R Bleday; S Stryker; B Christenson; S Wexner; A Senagore; D Rattner; J Sutton; A P Fine
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic colon resection versus open colon resection for adenocarcinoma. A multicenter study.

Authors:  M E Franklin; D Rosenthal; R F Norem
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  10 in total

1.  Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastamosis: a comparison of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Ashley S Vergis; Sarah N Steigerwald; Faizal D Bhojani; Paul A Sullivan; Krista M Hardy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Single center cost analysis of single-port and conventional laparoscopic surgical treatment in colorectal malignant diseases.

Authors:  Yoen T K van der Linden; Johannes A Govaert; Marta Fiocco; Wouter A van Dijk; Daniel J Lips; Hubert A Prins
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Emergent Laparoscopic Colectomy Is an Effective Alternative to Open Resection for Benign and Malignant Diseases: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sun-Bing Xu; Zhong Jia; Yi-Ping Zhu; Ren-Chao Zhang; Ping Wang
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Assessing the economic advantage of laparoscopic vs. open approaches for colorectal cancer by a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Hayashi; Nobuyuki Ozaki; Katsuhiro Ogawa; Yoshiaki Ikuta; Hideyuki Tanaka; Kenichi Ogata; Koichi Doi; Hiroshi Takamori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Retrospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann's Reversal: A Single-Institution Experience.

Authors:  Shayna Brathwaite; Maureen Kuhrt; Lianbo Yu; Mark Arnold; Syed Husain; Alan E Harzman
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.719

Review 6.  Emergent Challenges in Determining Costs for Economic Evaluations.

Authors:  Josephine C Jacobs; Paul G Barnett
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Comparison of the cost and outcomes following totally laparoscopic and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomies for gastric cancer: a single-institution comparison.

Authors:  Toshihiko Shinohara; Susumu Kawano; Yujiro Tanaka; Muneharu Fujisaki; Atsushi Watanabe; Katsuhiro Yamamoto; Nobuyoshi Hanyu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Cost minimization analysis of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol: a single-centre, case-matched study.

Authors:  Michał Pędziwiatr; Mateusz Wierdak; Michał Nowakowski; Magdalena Pisarska; Maciej Stanek; Michał Kisielewski; Maciej Matłok; Piotr Major; Stanisław Kłęk; Andrzej Budzyński
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 1.195

9.  Impact of laparoscopic versus open surgery on hospital costs for colon cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mauro Laudicella; Brendan Walsh; Aruna Munasinghe; Omar Faiz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Training for laparoscopic colorectal surgery creating an appropriate porcine model and curriculum for training.

Authors:  Tehemton Erach Udwadia
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.