Beklen Kerimoglu1, Avishai Neuman, Jonathan Paul, Dimitre G Stefanov, Rebecca Twersky. 1. From the *Department of Anesthesiology, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn; †Department of Anesthesiology, New York Hospital Queens, Flushing; and ‡New York College of Osteopathic Medicine of NYIT, Old Westbury, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Distraction technology suitable for the perioperative setting is readily available, but there is little evidence to show how it compares with oral midazolam in managing anxiety. Video glasses, which enable children to view and listen to cartoons and movies, may be used through the completion of inhaled induction. We compared the efficacy of oral midazolam and behavioral distraction with video glasses in managing preoperative anxiety in children. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, 96 children aged 4 to 9 years undergoing outpatient surgery were recruited to one of 3 intervention groups receiving midazolam, video glasses, or both. The Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale was the primary dependent measure used to assess anxiety at baseline before intervention, 20 minutes later at transport to the operating room (OR), and during mask induction. RESULTS: There was no significant increase in anxiety score within any group between baseline and OR transport (P = 0.21, 0.42, and 0.57 for midazolam, video glasses, and combined groups, respectively). An increase in anxiety, though not large enough to be clinically significant, was observed from baseline to induction in the midazolam and combined groups (P = 0.02 and 0.03) but not in the video glasses group (P = 0.38). Confidence intervals for pairwise comparisons in Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale changes among groups were all within a clinically significant difference of 15 units. CONCLUSIONS: The use of video glasses and midazolam alone or in combination maintains baseline levels of anxiety at time of transport to the OR and prevents significantly increased anxiety during induction of anesthesia in children. Video glasses are not inferior to midazolam for preoperative anxiolysis and provide a safe, noninvasive, nonpharmacologic, and pleasant alternative.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Distraction technology suitable for the perioperative setting is readily available, but there is little evidence to show how it compares with oral midazolam in managing anxiety. Video glasses, which enable children to view and listen to cartoons and movies, may be used through the completion of inhaled induction. We compared the efficacy of oral midazolam and behavioral distraction with video glasses in managing preoperative anxiety in children. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, 96 children aged 4 to 9 years undergoing outpatient surgery were recruited to one of 3 intervention groups receiving midazolam, video glasses, or both. The Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale was the primary dependent measure used to assess anxiety at baseline before intervention, 20 minutes later at transport to the operating room (OR), and during mask induction. RESULTS: There was no significant increase in anxiety score within any group between baseline and OR transport (P = 0.21, 0.42, and 0.57 for midazolam, video glasses, and combined groups, respectively). An increase in anxiety, though not large enough to be clinically significant, was observed from baseline to induction in the midazolam and combined groups (P = 0.02 and 0.03) but not in the video glasses group (P = 0.38). Confidence intervals for pairwise comparisons in Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale changes among groups were all within a clinically significant difference of 15 units. CONCLUSIONS: The use of video glasses and midazolam alone or in combination maintains baseline levels of anxiety at time of transport to the OR and prevents significantly increased anxiety during induction of anesthesia in children. Video glasses are not inferior to midazolam for preoperative anxiolysis and provide a safe, noninvasive, nonpharmacologic, and pleasant alternative.
Authors: Michael J Jung; Justin S Libaw; Kevin Ma; Elizabeth L Whitlock; John R Feiner; Jina L Sinskey Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 6.627
Authors: Esther Aleo; Amanda López Picado; Belén Joyanes Abancens; Carmen Soto Beauregard; Nuria Tur Salamanca; Carmen Esteban Polonios; María José Torrejón; Carlos González Perrino; Ana Rivas; Eva Arias; Diamelis Rodríguez; Mª Ángeles Rivas; Marina Laura Rodríguez Rojo; Patricia Fernández García; Jaime Rodríguez Alarcón; Borja San Pedro de Urquiza Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-11-11 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Thomas J Caruso; Jeremy H Tsui; Ellen Wang; David Scheinker; Paul J Sharek; Christine Cunningham; Samuel T Rodriguez Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2018-06-22
Authors: Esther Aleo Luján; Amanda Lopez-Picado; Ana Rivas; Belén Joyanes Abancens; Marina Laura Rodríguez Rojo; Patricia Fernández García; Carmen Soto Beauregard; Jaime Rodríguez Alarcón; Carlos González Perrino; Borja San Pedro de Urquiza; Eva Arias; Diamelis Rodriguez; Carmen Esteban Polonio; Maria José Torrejón Journal: Trials Date: 2020-01-02 Impact factor: 2.279