Literature DB >> 24256050

How to set standards on performance-based examinations: AMEE Guide No. 85.

Danette W McKinley1, John J Norcini.   

Abstract

This AMEE Guide offers an overview of methods used in determining passing scores for performance-based assessments. A consideration of various assessment purposes will provide context for discussion of standard setting methods, followed by a description of different types of standards that are typically set in health professions education. A step-by-step guide to the standard setting process will be presented. The Guide includes detailed explanations and examples of standard setting methods, and each section presents examples of research done using the method with performance-based assessments in health professions education. It is intended for use by those who are responsible for determining passing scores on tests and need a resource explaining methods for setting passing scores. The Guide contains a discussion of reasons for assessment, defines standards, and presents standard setting methods that have been researched with performance-based tests. The first section of the Guide addresses types of standards that are set. The next section provides guidance on preparing for a standard setting study. The following sections include conducting the meeting, selecting a method, implementing the passing score, and maintaining the standard. The Guide will support efforts to determine passing scores that are based on research, matched to the assessment purpose, and reproducible.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24256050     DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.853119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  11 in total

1.  An introduction to standard setting methods in dentistry.

Authors:  J Puryer; D O'Sullivan
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Developing assessment: involving the sessional clinical teacher.

Authors:  H Bateman; J M Thomason; G McCracken; J Ellis
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Administration and performance on the Spinal Cord Injury Medicine Certification Examination over a 10-year period.

Authors:  Sunil Sabharwal; Anthony E Chiodo; Mikaela M Raddatz
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Procedure-specific assessment tool for flexible pharyngo-laryngoscopy: gathering validity evidence and setting pass-fail standards.

Authors:  Jacob Melchiors; K Petersen; T Todsen; A Bohr; Lars Konge; Christian von Buchwald
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  The Role of Video-Assisted E-Learning in Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Insertion Training.

Authors:  Ng Lai Peng; Eileen Koh Yi Ling
Journal:  PRiMER       Date:  2021-01-28

6.  Addressing the theory-practice gap in assessment.

Authors:  Sarah R Wright; Matt Homer
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2017-02

7.  Pass/fail decisions and standards: the impact of differential examiner stringency on OSCE outcomes.

Authors:  Matt Homer
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.629

8.  Insights into the Angoff method: results from a simulation study.

Authors:  Boaz Shulruf; Tim Wilkinson; Jennifer Weller; Philip Jones; Phillippa Poole
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Modifying Hofstee standard setting for assessments that vary in difficulty, and to determine boundaries for different levels of achievement.

Authors:  Steven A Burr; John Whittle; Lucy C Fairclough; Lee Coombes; Ian Todd
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  A pilot study of marking accuracy and mental workload as measures of OSCE examiner performance.

Authors:  Aidan Byrne; Tereza Soskova; Jayne Dawkins; Lee Coombes
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.