Literature DB >> 24255757

Retropubic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a comparative study of postoperative complications.

Jeman Ryu1, Taekmin Kwon, Yoon Soo Kyung, Sungwoo Hong, Dalsan You, In Gab Jeong, Choung-Soo Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) with those of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) performed by a single surgeon for the treatment of prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The postoperative complications of 341 patients who underwent RRP and 524 patients who underwent RALP for prostate cancer at the Asan Medical Center between July 2007 and August 2012 were retrospectively reviewed and compared. Complications were classified according to the modified Clavien classification system.
RESULTS: RALP was associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (mean, 7.9 days vs. 10.1 days, p<0.001) and duration of urethral catheterization (6.2 days vs. 7.5 days, p<0.001) than RRP. Major complications (Clavien grade III-IV) were less common in the RALP group than in the RRP group (3.4% vs. 7.6%, p=0.006). There were no significant differences in medical complications between procedures. Considering surgical complications, urinary retention (7.0% vs. 2.7%, p=0.002) and wound repair (4.1% vs. 0.2%, p<0.001) were more common after RRP than after RALP. Extravasation of contrast medium during cystography was more common in the RRP group than in the RALP group (10.0% vs. 2.1%, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: RALP is associated with a lower complication rate than RRP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Prostate; Prostate neoplasms; Prostatectomy

Year:  2013        PMID: 24255757      PMCID: PMC3830968          DOI: 10.4111/kju.2013.54.11.756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Urol        ISSN: 2005-6737


  29 in total

1.  Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas E Ahlering; David Woo; Louis Eichel; David I Lee; Robert Edwards; Douglas W Skarecky
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Authors:  T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Walter Artibani; Andrea Cestari; Antonio Galfano; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Bertrand Guillonneau; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul Patel; Jens Rassweiler; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.

Authors:  Jim C Hu; Nathanael D Hevelone; Marcos D Ferreira; Stuart R Lipsitz; Toni K Choueiri; Martin G Sanda; Craig C Earle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.

Authors:  Stefan Carlsson; Andreas E Nilsson; Martin C Schumacher; Martin N Jonsson; Daniela S Volz; Gunnar Steineck; Peter N Wiklund
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Risk and prevention of acute urinary retention after robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tariq A Khemees; Ryan Novak; Ronney Abaza
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy: time trends, morbidity and mortality in Japan.

Authors:  Y Arai; S Egawa; K Tobisu; K Sagiyama; Y Sumiyoshi; K Hashine; M Kawakita; T Matsuda; K Matsumoto; H Fujimoto; T Okada; Y Kakehi; T Terachi; O Ogawa
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  A Nadu; L Salomon; A Hoznek; L E Olsson; F Saint; A de La Taille; A Cicco; D Chopin; C C Abbou
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Simonetta Fracalanza; Carolina D'Elia; Silvia Secco; Massimo Iafrate; Stefano Cavalleri; Walter Artibani
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution.

Authors:  A Tewari; A Srivasatava; M Menon
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.588

View more
  6 in total

1.  Surgical site infections after radical prostatectomy: A comparative study between robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Daniar K Osmonov; Amr A Faddan; Alexey V Aksenov; Carsten M Naumann; Leonid M Rapoport; Evgeny A Bezrukov; Dmitry G Tsarichenko; Klaus P Jünemann
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-07

Review 2.  Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?

Authors:  Abbas Basiri; Jean Jmch de la Rosette; Shahin Tabatabaei; Henry H Woo; M Pilar Laguna; Hamidreza Shemshaki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Urologic robotic surgery in Korea: past and present.

Authors:  Ill Young Seo
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-08-10

4.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes between running versus interrupted vesicourethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy: A single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Ju Hyun Lim; Chang Myon Park; Han Kwon Kim; Jong Yeon Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-06-01

Review 5.  Robotic vs. Retropubic radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer: A systematic review and an meta-analysis update.

Authors:  Kun Tang; Kehua Jiang; Hongbo Chen; Zhiqiang Chen; Hua Xu; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-09

Review 6.  Comparison Between Robotic and Laparoscopic or Open Anastomoses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis D Kostakis; Harkiran Sran; Raphael Uwechue; Pankaj Chandak; Jonathon Olsburgh; Nizam Mamode; Ioannis Loukopoulos; Nicos Kessaris
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2019-12-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.