Literature DB >> 24254496

Inference for the median residual life function in sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.

Kelley M Kidwell1, Jin H Ko, Abdus S Wahed.   

Abstract

In survival analysis, median residual lifetime is often used as a summary measure to assess treatment effectiveness; it is not clear, however, how such a quantity could be estimated for a given dynamic treatment regimen using data from sequential randomized clinical trials. We propose a method to estimate a dynamic treatment regimen-specific median residual life (MERL) function from sequential multiple assignment randomized trials. We present the MERL estimator, which is based on inverse probability weighting, as well as, two variance estimates for the MERL estimator. One variance estimate follows from Lunceford, Davidian and Tsiatis' 2002 survival function-based variance estimate and the other uses the sandwich estimator. The MERL estimator is evaluated, and its two variance estimates are compared through simulation studies, showing that the estimator and both variance estimates produce approximately unbiased results in large samples. To demonstrate our methods, the estimator has been applied to data from a sequentially randomized leukemia clinical trial.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive treatment strategy; dynamic treatment regimen; inverse probability weighting; median residual life function; non-parametric estimation; sequential randomization

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24254496      PMCID: PMC4153353          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  Estimation of survival distributions of treatment policies in two-stage randomization designs in clinical trials.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian; Anastasios A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Flexible treatment strategies in chronic disease: clinical and research implications.

Authors:  P W Lavori; R Dawson; A J Rush
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Optimal estimator for the survival distribution and related quantities for treatment policies in two-stage randomization designs in clinical trials.

Authors:  Abdus S Wahed; Anastasios A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Nonparametric inference on median residual life function.

Authors:  Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Sin-Ho Jung; Joseph P Costantino
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption?

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Constantine E Frangakis
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Weighted log-rank statistic to compare shared-path adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  Kelley M Kidwell; Abdus S Wahed
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  Postremission therapy in older patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized trial comparing mitoxantrone and intermediate-dose cytarabine with standard-dose cytarabine.

Authors:  R M Stone; D T Berg; S L George; R K Dodge; P A Paciucci; P P Schulman; E J Lee; J O Moore; B L Powell; M R Baer; C D Bloomfield; C A Schiffer
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after initial chemotherapy for elderly patients with primary acute myelogenous leukemia. Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

Authors:  R M Stone; D T Berg; S L George; R K Dodge; P A Paciucci; P Schulman; E J Lee; J O Moore; B L Powell; C A Schiffer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.