Literature DB >> 24253788

Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate versus rhBMP-2 in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Sreeharsha V Nandyala1, Alejandro Marquez-Lara, Steven J Fineberg, Miguel Pelton, Kern Singh.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE: To compare arthrodesis rates between patients undergoing a primary single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) with either Actifuse or recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Preclinical animal studies suggest that silicate-substituted calcium phosphate (Actifuse) bone graft substitute offers equivalent or an increased fusion rate compared with other graft enhancers/extenders and rhBMP-2.
METHODS: Fifty-two patients undergoing a single-level unilateral MIS TLIF were evenly randomized into 2 cohorts as follows: the Actifuse cohort received Actifuse combined with 5 mL of bone marrow aspirate (n = 26; 50%), whereas the rhBMP cohort received 4.2 mg of rhBMP-2 (n = 26; 50%). A pre hoc G*Power analysis yielded a sample size of n = 26 that was determined through a 2-tailed distribution calculation. Computed tomographic analysis was performed at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale scores were obtained to assess the clinical outcomes. Arthrodesis was determined by 2 separate, blinded orthopedic surgeons and a board certified radiologist.
RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, 65% (17/26) of the Actifuse cohort and 92% (24/26) of the rhBMP-2 cohort demonstrated a radiographical arthrodesis (P = 0.01). In both study cohorts, the 1-year postoperative visual analogue scale scores significantly improved (P < 0.001). Pseudarthrosis rates at 1 year were 35.0% (9/26) and 7.7% (2/26) for the Actifuse and rhBMP-2 groups, respectively (P = 0.01, OR = 6.35, 95% CI = 1.22-33.1). A greater reoperation rate was noted in the Actifuse cohort (35.0%, 9/26) compared with the BMP-2 cohort (7.7%, 2/26; P = 0.01). One patient with BMP-2 also experienced symptomatic neuroforaminal bone growth (3.8%, n = 1/26).
CONCLUSION: Silicate-substituted calcium phosphate was associated with a significantly lower rate of arthrodesis than rhBMP-2 in a MIS TLIF. The patients with pseudarthrosis in both cohorts were all clinically symptomatic with an unimproved visual analogue scale score. Additional analysis of Actifuse and other graft enhancers/extenders are needed prior to the utilization for an MIS TLIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24253788     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

1.  Preliminary Results of Bioactive Amniotic Suspension with Allograft for Achieving One and Two-Level Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Pierce D Nunley; Eubulus J Kerr; Philip A Utter; David A Cavanaugh; Kelly A Frank; Devan Moody; Brian McManus; Marcus B Stone
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-04-18

2.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

3.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of concentrated bone marrow aspirate with allograft and demineralized bone matrix for posterolateral and interbody lumbar fusion in elderly patients.

Authors:  Remi M Ajiboye; Jason T Hamamoto; Mark A Eckardt; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation to enhance spinal fusion: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paul Park; Darryl Lau; Erika D Brodt; Joseph R Dettori
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2014-10

5.  Evaluation of a novel tool for bone graft delivery in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Kleiner; Hannah M Kleiner; E John Grimberg; Stefanie J Throlson
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-05-13

Review 6.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Laminectomy/Discectomy, Transforaminal Lumbar, and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Allicia O Imada; Tridu R Huynh; Doniel Drazin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 7.  The use of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) and pseudarthrosis, a literature review.

Authors:  Oberdan Ribeiro Gonçalves de Oliveira; Saul Pinheiro Rebouças Martins; Wyvison Gomes de Lima; Marília Maia Gomes
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-06-22

8.  Multiscale analyses reveal native-like lamellar bone repair and near perfect bone-contact with porous strontium-loaded bioactive glass.

Authors:  H Autefage; F Allen; H M Tang; C Kallepitis; E Gentleman; N Reznikov; K Nitiputri; A Nommeots-Nomm; M D O'Donnell; C Lange; B M Seidt; T B Kim; A K Solanki; F Tallia; G Young; P D Lee; B F Pierce; W Wagermaier; P Fratzl; A Goodship; J R Jones; G Blunn; M M Stevens
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Surgical results of lumbar interbody fusion using calcium phosphate cement.

Authors:  Motohiro Hirasawa; Hideo Mure; Hiroyuki Toi; Shinji Nagahiro
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 1.742

10.  Evaluation of functional outcomes in individuals 10 years after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with corundum implants and decompression: a comparison of 2 surgical techniques.

Authors:  Aleksandra Truszczyńska; Kazimierz Rąpała; Stanislaw Łukawski; Zbigniew Trzaskoma; Adam Tarnowski; Justyna Drzal-Grabiec; Anna Cabak
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-08-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.