Literature DB >> 24253498

Measurement of angle Kappa with Orbscan II and Galilei G4: effect of accommodation.

Alberto Domínguez-Vicent1, Daniel Monsálvez-Romín, Cari Pérez-Vives, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, Robert Montés-Micó.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure angle kappa distance with Orbscan II and Galilei G4, and to evaluate possible variations in this value for different accommodation degrees.
METHODS: Angle kappa was measured using the Orbscan II and the Galilei G4 in the right eye of 80 patients aged from 20 to 40 years. This value was measured three times per eye and per device, and the average was retained. Angle kappa was measured for far vision using the Orbscan II and the Galilei G4 in a random order for each subject. The Galilei G4 was used to measure angle kappa as a function of accommodation, where the first measure started at +1 D and the vergence was changed until reaching -4 D, in 1 D steps. In both measures, the kappa distance was expressed in millimetres.
RESULTS: At distance, the values of angle kappa were 0.43 ± 0.13 mm and 0.27 ± 0.15 mm measured with the Orbscan II and Galilei G4 systems respectively. Statistical significant differences were found (P < 0.01). With regard to the angle kappa values obtained as a function of accommodation, the values were 0.25 ± 0.15 mm, 0.26 ± 0.15 mm, 0.30 ± 0.20 mm, 0.27 ± 0.15 and 0.26 ± 0.15 mm, for +1 D, -1 D, -2 D, -3 D and -4 D respectively. No statistical significant differences were found among 0 D and the other vergences evaluated (P > 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: For far vision, Orbscan II measured significantly higher angle kappa values than Galilei G4, the mean difference being 0.16 ± 0.08 mm. For different accommodation levels, the kappa distance did not change significantly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24253498     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-013-2509-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  23 in total

1.  Predictive factor and kappa angle analysis for visual satisfactions in patients with multifocal IOL implantation.

Authors:  G Prakash; D R Prakash; A Agarwal; D A Kumar; A Agarwal; S Jacob
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Topographic and biomechanical differences between hyperopic and myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Mujtaba A Qazi; Cynthia J Roberts; Ashraf M Mahmoud; Jay S Pepose
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Centering corneal surgical procedures.

Authors:  H Uozato; D L Guyton
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-03-15       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Distribution of angle kappa measurements with Orbscan II in a population-based survey.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Mehdi KhabazKhoob; Kamran Yazdani; Shiva Mehravaran; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Mechanism of compensation of aberrations in the human eye.

Authors:  Juan Tabernero; Antonio Benito; Encarna Alcón; Pablo Artal
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  The angle kappa in strabismic individuals.

Authors:  Hikmet Basmak; Afsun Sahin; Nilgun Yildirim; Tuncer Saricicek; Sumru Yurdakul
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec

8.  Measurement of angle kappa with synoptophore and Orbscan II in a normal population.

Authors:  Hikmet Basmak; Afsun Sahin; Nilgun Yildirim; Thanos D Papakostas; A John Kanellopoulos
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Centration analysis of ablation over the coaxial corneal light reflex for hyperopic LASIK.

Authors:  Colin C K Chan; Brian S Boxer Wachler
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Photoablation centration on the corneal optical center in myopic LASIK using AOV excimer laser.

Authors:  Liangcheng Wu; Xingtao Zhou; Renyuan Chu; Qing Wang
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.922

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pupil barycenter configuration in patients with myopia and hyperopia.

Authors:  Haci Koc; Faruk Kaya
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 2.029

2.  Dynamic distribution and correlation analysis of the angle kappa in myopia patients undergoing femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Wen-Qing Deng; Yu-Hui Fang; Shu-Hua Lin; Ying-Jun Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Measurement of Angle Kappa Using Ultrasound Biomicroscopy and Corneal Topography.

Authors:  Joon Hyung Yeo; Nam Ju Moon; Jeong Kyu Lee
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-24

4.  The relationship between angle kappa and astigmatism after phacoemulsification with implanting of spherical and aspheric intraocular lens.

Authors:  Larysa Tutchenko; Sudi Patel; Mykhailo Skovron; Olha Horak; Oleksiy Voytsekhivskyy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Comparison of preoperative angle kappa measurements in the eyes of cataract patients obtained from Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry, and ray-tracing aberrometry.

Authors:  Miaomiao Qin; Yurong Yuan; Ying Wang; Pengfei Li; Wei Chen; Yong Wang; Mei Yang; Jian Wu; Min Ji; Jiawei Luo; Jiamin Tang; Xiaojuan Chen; Yemeng Huang; Huaijin Guan
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Image registration reveals central lens thickness minimally increases during accommodation.

Authors:  Ronald A Schachar; Majid Mani; Ira H Schachar
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.