Literature DB >> 24252245

An advanced phantom study assessing the feasibility of neuronal current imaging by ultra-low-field NMR.

Rainer Körber1, Jaakko O Nieminen2, Nora Höfner3, Vojko Jazbinšek4, Hans-Jürgen Scheer3, Kiwoong Kim5, Martin Burghoff3.   

Abstract

In ultra-low-field (ULF) NMR/MRI, a common scheme is to magnetize the sample by a polarizing field of up to hundreds of mT, after which the NMR signal, precessing in a field on the order of several μT, is detected with superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs). In our ULF-NMR system, we polarize with up to 50mT and deploy a single-stage DC-SQUID current sensor with an integrated input coil which is connected to a wire-wound Nb gradiometer. We developed this system (white noise 0.50fT/√Hz) for assessing the feasibility of imaging neuronal currents by detecting their effect on the ULF-NMR signal. Magnetoencephalography investigations of evoked brain activity showed neuronal dipole moments below 50nAm. With our instrumentation, we have studied two different approaches for neuronal current imaging. In the so-called DC effect, long-lived neuronal activity shifts the Larmor frequency of the surrounding protons. An alternative strategy is to exploit fast neuronal activity as a tipping pulse. This so-called AC effect requires the proton Larmor frequency to match the frequency of the neuronal activity, which ranges from near-DC to ∼kHz. We emulated neuronal activity by means of a single dipolar source in a physical phantom, consisting of a hollow sphere filled with an aqueous solution of CuSO4 and NaCl. In these phantom studies, with physiologically relevant dipole depths, we determined resolution limits for our set-up for the AC and the DC effect of ∼10μAm and ∼50nAm, respectively. Hence, the DC effect appears to be detectable in vivo by current ULF-NMR technology.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Current dipole phantom; MEG; Neuronal currents; Ultra-low-field NMR

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24252245     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  3 in total

1.  In Vivo Magnetic Recording of Neuronal Activity.

Authors:  Laure Caruso; Thomas Wunderle; Christopher Murphy Lewis; Joao Valadeiro; Vincent Trauchessec; Josué Trejo Rosillo; José Pedro Amaral; Jianguang Ni; Patrick Jendritza; Claude Fermon; Susana Cardoso; Paulo Peixeiro Freitas; Pascal Fries; Myriam Pannetier-Lecoeur
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  T 1 relaxation measurement of ex-vivo breast cancer tissues at ultralow magnetic fields.

Authors:  Seong-Joo Lee; Jeong Hyun Shim; Kiwoong Kim; Seong-Min Hwang; Kwon Kyu Yu; Sanghyun Lim; Jae Ho Han; Hyunee Yim; Jang-Hee Kim; Yong Sik Jung; Ku Sang Kim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Optimized 3D co-registration of ultra-low-field and high-field magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Roberto Guidotti; Raffaele Sinibaldi; Cinzia De Luca; Allegra Conti; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Koos C J Zevenhoven; Per E Magnelind; Vittorio Pizzella; Cosimo Del Gratta; Gian Luca Romani; Stefania Della Penna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.