Literature DB >> 28844526

In Vivo Magnetic Recording of Neuronal Activity.

Laure Caruso1, Thomas Wunderle2, Christopher Murphy Lewis2, Joao Valadeiro3, Vincent Trauchessec1, Josué Trejo Rosillo1, José Pedro Amaral3, Jianguang Ni2, Patrick Jendritza2, Claude Fermon1, Susana Cardoso3, Paulo Peixeiro Freitas3, Pascal Fries4, Myriam Pannetier-Lecoeur5.   

Abstract

Neuronal activity generates ionic flows and thereby both magnetic fields and electric potential differences, i.e., voltages. Voltage measurements are widely used but suffer from isolating and smearing properties of tissue between source and sensor, are blind to ionic flow direction, and reflect the difference between two electrodes, complicating interpretation. Magnetic field measurements could overcome these limitations but have been essentially limited to magnetoencephalography (MEG), using centimeter-sized, helium-cooled extracranial sensors. Here, we report on in vivo magnetic recordings of neuronal activity from visual cortex of cats with magnetrodes, specially developed needle-shaped probes carrying micron-sized, non-cooled magnetic sensors based on spin electronics. Event-related magnetic fields inside the neuropil were on the order of several nanoteslas, informing MEG source models and efforts for magnetic field measurements through MRI. Though the signal-to-noise ratio is still inferior to electrophysiology, this proof of concept demonstrates the potential to exploit the fundamental advantages of magnetophysiology.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MEG; Magnetic fields; magnetic sensors; magnetoencephalography; spin electronics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28844526      PMCID: PMC5744593          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  30 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation--a new tool for functional imaging of the brain.

Authors:  R J Ilmoniemi; J Ruohonen; J Karhu
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  1999

2.  Stimulus dependence of neuronal correlation in primary visual cortex of the macaque.

Authors:  Adam Kohn; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neurophysiology: Hodgkin and Huxley model--still standing?

Authors:  David A McCormick; Yousheng Shu; Yuguo Yu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Action potential initiation and backpropagation in neurons of the mammalian CNS.

Authors:  G Stuart; N Spruston; B Sakmann; M Häusser
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 5.  Recording of brain activity across spatial scales.

Authors:  C M Lewis; C A Bosman; P Fries
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Assessing the internal consistency of the event-related potential: An example analysis.

Authors:  Nina N Thigpen; Emily S Kappenman; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Magnetoencephalography: evidence of magnetic fields produced by alpha-rhythm currents.

Authors:  D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Current source-density method and application in cat cerebral cortex: investigation of evoked potentials and EEG phenomena.

Authors:  U Mitzdorf
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  The magnetic field of a single axon. A comparison of theory and experiment.

Authors:  B J Roth; J P Wikswo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Eric Maris; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-23
View more
  9 in total

1.  Techniques: Having a field day.

Authors:  Natasha Bray
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Giant Magnetoresistance Biosensors in Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Kai Wu; Denis Tonini; Shuang Liang; Renata Saha; Vinit Kumar Chugh; Jian-Ping Wang
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 10.383

3.  In silico assessment of electrophysiological neuronal recordings mediated by magnetoelectric nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ilhan Bok; Ido Haber; Xiaofei Qu; Aviad Hai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Ultra-compact dual-band smart NEMS magnetoelectric antennas for simultaneous wireless energy harvesting and magnetic field sensing.

Authors:  Mohsen Zaeimbashi; Mehdi Nasrollahpour; Adam Khalifa; Anthony Romano; Xianfeng Liang; Huaihao Chen; Neville Sun; Alexei Matyushov; Hwaider Lin; Cunzheng Dong; Ziyue Xu; Ankit Mittal; Isabel Martos-Repath; Gaurav Jha; Nikita Mirchandani; Diptashree Das; Marvin Onabajo; Aatmesh Shrivastava; Sydney Cash; Nian X Sun
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  Integrated Giant Magnetoresistance Technology for Approachable Weak Biomagnetic Signal Detections.

Authors:  Hui-Min Shen; Liang Hu; Xin Fu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-07       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Two-dimensional arrays of vertically packed spin-valves with picoTesla sensitivity at room temperature.

Authors:  Marilia Silva; Fernando Franco; Diana C Leitao; Susana Cardoso; Paulo P Freitas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Detection of biological signals from a live mammalian muscle using an early stage diamond quantum sensor.

Authors:  James Luke Webb; Luca Troise; Nikolaj Winther Hansen; Christoffer Olsson; Adam M Wojciechowski; Jocelyn Achard; Ovidiu Brinza; Robert Staacke; Michael Kieschnick; Jan Meijer; Axel Thielscher; Jean-François Perrier; Kirstine Berg-Sørensen; Alexander Huck; Ulrik Lund Andersen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Advances in Magnetoresistive Biosensors.

Authors:  Diqing Su; Kai Wu; Renata Saha; Chaoyi Peng; Jian-Ping Wang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 9.  Astroglial Isopotentiality and Calcium-Associated Biomagnetic Field Effects on Cortical Neuronal Coupling.

Authors:  Marcos Martinez-Banaclocha
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 6.600

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.