Stephanie Deighton1, Jean Addington2. 1. Department of Neuroscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 2. Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract
AIM: Recent research suggests aerobic exercise has a positive impact on symptoms and cognition in psychosis. Because individuals with psychosis are at risk of weight gain and the resultant metabolic side-effects, developing effective exercise programmes is of interest. Furthermore, this may be a useful intervention for those who are at risk of developing psychosis, that is, those at clinical high risk (CHR). The aim of this initial exploratory project was to examine the role of exercise in participants at CHR for psychosis. METHODS: A comprehensive questionnaire was developed to assess current physical activity involvement; exercise levels in terms of frequency, intensity and duration; and perceived fitness levels. Reported barriers to exercise and reasons for exercising were also considered. Eighty participants, 40 CHR and 40 healthy controls, were assessed with this questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, both groups were involved in a wide range of physical activity. Healthy controls reported higher levels of participation in indoor/outdoor activities and strength and/or flexibility training. They also exercised more frequently, more intensely and reported higher perceived fitness levels than CHR participants. Levels of exercise were unrelated to clinical symptoms and functioning in CHR participants. CHR youth reported more barriers to exercise and less positive reasons for exercising that were related to self-perception. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that exercise should be investigated further in the CHR population as it may have treatment implications.
AIM: Recent research suggests aerobic exercise has a positive impact on symptoms and cognition in psychosis. Because individuals with psychosis are at risk of weight gain and the resultant metabolic side-effects, developing effective exercise programmes is of interest. Furthermore, this may be a useful intervention for those who are at risk of developing psychosis, that is, those at clinical high risk (CHR). The aim of this initial exploratory project was to examine the role of exercise in participants at CHR for psychosis. METHODS: A comprehensive questionnaire was developed to assess current physical activity involvement; exercise levels in terms of frequency, intensity and duration; and perceived fitness levels. Reported barriers to exercise and reasons for exercising were also considered. Eighty participants, 40 CHR and 40 healthy controls, were assessed with this questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, both groups were involved in a wide range of physical activity. Healthy controls reported higher levels of participation in indoor/outdoor activities and strength and/or flexibility training. They also exercised more frequently, more intensely and reported higher perceived fitness levels than CHR participants. Levels of exercise were unrelated to clinical symptoms and functioning in CHR participants. CHR youth reported more barriers to exercise and less positive reasons for exercising that were related to self-perception. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that exercise should be investigated further in the CHR population as it may have treatment implications.
Authors: Mario Alvarez-Jiménez; Sarah E Hetrick; César González-Blanch; John F Gleeson; Patrick D McGorry Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: Kirk I Erickson; Michelle W Voss; Ruchika Shaurya Prakash; Chandramallika Basak; Amanda Szabo; Laura Chaddock; Jennifer S Kim; Susie Heo; Heloisa Alves; Siobhan M White; Thomas R Wojcicki; Emily Mailey; Victoria J Vieira; Stephen A Martin; Brandt D Pence; Jeffrey A Woods; Edward McAuley; Arthur F Kramer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Laura Chaddock; Kirk I Erickson; Ruchika Shaurya Prakash; Jennifer S Kim; Michelle W Voss; Matt Vanpatter; Matthew B Pontifex; Lauren B Raine; Alex Konkel; Charles H Hillman; Neal J Cohen; Arthur F Kramer Journal: Brain Res Date: 2010-08-22 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Mark S Tremblay; Darren E R Warburton; Ian Janssen; Donald H Paterson; Amy E Latimer; Ryan E Rhodes; Michelle E Kho; Audrey Hicks; Allana G Leblanc; Lori Zehr; Kelly Murumets; Mary Duggan Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: Frank-Gerald Pajonk; Thomas Wobrock; Oliver Gruber; Harald Scherk; Dorothea Berner; Inge Kaizl; Astrid Kierer; Stephanie Müller; Martin Oest; Tim Meyer; Martin Backens; Thomas Schneider-Axmann; Allen E Thornton; William G Honer; Peter Falkai Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-02
Authors: Aricca D Van Citters; Sarah I Pratt; Kenneth Jue; Gail Williams; Patricia T Miller; Haiyi Xie; Stephen J Bartels Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2009-12-10
Authors: Alexandra G Parker; Sarah E Hetrick; Anthony F Jorm; Alison R Yung; Patrick D McGorry; Andrew Mackinnon; Bridget Moller; Rosemary Purcell Journal: Trials Date: 2011-03-13 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Vijay A Mittal; Teresa Vargas; K Juston Osborne; Derek Dean; Tina Gupta; Ivanka Ristanovic; Christine I Hooker; Stewart A Shankman Journal: Curr Treat Options Psychiatry Date: 2017-04-18
Authors: David Kimhy; Vijay A Mittal; Katherine S F Damme; Richard P Sloan; Matthew N Bartels; Alara Ozsan; Luz H Ospina Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 4.379