Literature DB >> 24251982

An integrated model of stomatal development and leaf physiology.

Graham J Dow1, Dominique C Bergmann1,2, Joseph A Berry3.   

Abstract

• Stomatal conductance (g(s)) is constrained by the size and number of stomata on the plant epidermis, and the potential maximum rate of g(s) can be calculated based on these stomatal traits (Anatomical g(smax)). However, the relationship between Anatomical g(smax) and operational g(s) under atmospheric conditions remains undefined. • Leaf-level gas-exchange measurements were performed for six Arabidopsis thaliana genotypes that have different Anatomical g(smax) profiles resulting from mutations or transgene activity in stomatal development. • We found that Anatomical g(smax) was an accurate prediction of g(s) under gas-exchange conditions that maximized stomatal opening, namely high-intensity light, low [CO₂], and high relative humidity. Plants with different Anatomical g(smax) had quantitatively similar responses to increasing [CO₂] when g(s) was scaled to Anatomical g(smax). This latter relationship allowed us to produce and test an empirical model derived from the Ball-Woodrow-Berry equation that estimates g(s) as a function of Anatomical g(smax), relative humidity, and [CO₂] at the leaf. • The capacity to predict operational g(s) via Anatomical g(smax) and the pore-specific short-term response to [CO₂] demonstrates a precise link between stomatal development and leaf physiology. This connection should be useful to quantify the gas flux of plants in past, present, and future CO₂ regimes based upon the anatomical features of stomata. No claim to US government works. New Phytologist
© 2013 New Phytologist Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arabidopsis thaliana; Ball-Woodrow-Berry; CO2 responses; climate change; gzzm321990smax; model; stomatal conductance; stomatal development

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24251982     DOI: 10.1111/nph.12608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  36 in total

Review 1.  Stomatal Development and Perspectives toward Agricultural Improvement.

Authors:  Hitoshi Endo; Keiko U Torii
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  Paleoecology, Ploidy, Paleoatmospheric Composition, and Developmental Biology: A Review of the Multiple Uses of Fossil Stomata.

Authors:  Jennifer C McElwain; Margret Steinthorsdottir
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  A Mutation in the bHLH Domain of the SPCH Transcription Factor Uncovers a BR-Dependent Mechanism for Stomatal Development.

Authors:  Alberto de Marcos; Anaxi Houbaert; Magdalena Triviño; Dolores Delgado; Mar Martín-Trillo; Eugenia Russinova; Carmen Fenoll; Montaña Mena
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Enhanced Stomatal Conductance by a Spontaneous Arabidopsis Tetraploid, Me-0, Results from Increased Stomatal Size and Greater Stomatal Aperture.

Authors:  Keina Monda; Hiromitsu Araki; Satoru Kuhara; Genki Ishigaki; Ryo Akashi; Juntaro Negi; Mikiko Kojima; Hitoshi Sakakibara; Sho Takahashi; Mimi Hashimoto-Sugimoto; Nobuharu Goto; Koh Iba
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 5.  CO2 Sensing and CO2 Regulation of Stomatal Conductance: Advances and Open Questions.

Authors:  Cawas B Engineer; Mimi Hashimoto-Sugimoto; Juntaro Negi; Maria Israelsson-Nordström; Tamar Azoulay-Shemer; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Koh Iba; Julian I Schroeder
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 18.313

6.  Quantitative genetic analysis indicates natural selection on leaf phenotypes across wild tomato species (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon; Solanaceae).

Authors:  Christopher D Muir; James B Pease; Leonie C Moyle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The Developmental Basis of Stomatal Density and Flux.

Authors:  Lawren Sack; Thomas N Buckley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  SHORTROOT-Mediated Increase in Stomatal Density Has No Impact on Photosynthetic Efficiency.

Authors:  Mara L Schuler; Olga V Sedelnikova; Berkley J Walker; Peter Westhoff; Jane A Langdale
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Optimal stomatal behavior with competition for water and risk of hydraulic impairment.

Authors:  Adam Wolf; William R L Anderegg; Stephen W Pacala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Pore size regulates operating stomatal conductance, while stomatal densities drive the partitioning of conductance between leaf sides.

Authors:  Dimitrios Fanourakis; Habtamu Giday; Rubén Milla; Roland Pieruschka; Katrine H Kjaer; Marie Bolger; Aleksandar Vasilevski; Adriano Nunes-Nesi; Fabio Fiorani; Carl-Otto Ottosen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 4.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.