Hannah Noel1, Simon Denny1, Bridget Farrant1, Fiona Rossen2, Tasileta Teevale3, Terryann Clark4, Terry Fleming1, Pat Bullen5, Janie Sheridan6, Sarah Fortune3. 1. Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 2. Department of Social and Community Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 3. School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 4. School of Nursing, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 5. School of Learning, Development and Professional Practice, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 6. School of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
AIMS: The aims of this study are to identify clinically meaningful groups of adolescents based on their engagement in high levels of risk behaviours or severe emotional health concerns and to describe the demographic characteristics of these groups in two populations of school students in New Zealand. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of secondary school students was surveyed in 2007; alternative education (AE) students in Auckland and Northland were surveyed in 2009. A total of 9107 secondary school students and 335 AE students completed a youth health questionnaire using Internet tablets. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify groups of students on the basis of distinct profiles of their risk behaviours and mental health concerns. RESULTS: The majority (80%) of students in secondary schools are 'healthy' and report few health concerns, 16% are considered 'risky' or 'distressed', and 4% report 'multiple' risk behaviour profiles or emotional health concerns. In AE, only 21% of students were considered 'healthy' with most featuring in the 'risky' or 'multiple' groups. Females were more likely to be 'distressed', whereas males were more likely to feature in the 'risky' or 'multiple' groups. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically-concerning health risk behaviours and emotional health concerns 'cluster' in up to 20% of students in secondary schools and up to 79% of students in AE. Gender, ethnic and socio-economic disparities are also observed. This highlights the importance of comprehensive psychosocial assessment and appropriate service provision, particularly for at-risk groups.
AIMS: The aims of this study are to identify clinically meaningful groups of adolescents based on their engagement in high levels of risk behaviours or severe emotional health concerns and to describe the demographic characteristics of these groups in two populations of school students in New Zealand. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of secondary school students was surveyed in 2007; alternative education (AE) students in Auckland and Northland were surveyed in 2009. A total of 9107 secondary school students and 335 AE students completed a youth health questionnaire using Internet tablets. Latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify groups of students on the basis of distinct profiles of their risk behaviours and mental health concerns. RESULTS: The majority (80%) of students in secondary schools are 'healthy' and report few health concerns, 16% are considered 'risky' or 'distressed', and 4% report 'multiple' risk behaviour profiles or emotional health concerns. In AE, only 21% of students were considered 'healthy' with most featuring in the 'risky' or 'multiple' groups. Females were more likely to be 'distressed', whereas males were more likely to feature in the 'risky' or 'multiple' groups. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically-concerning health risk behaviours and emotional health concerns 'cluster' in up to 20% of students in secondary schools and up to 79% of students in AE. Gender, ethnic and socio-economic disparities are also observed. This highlights the importance of comprehensive psychosocial assessment and appropriate service provision, particularly for at-risk groups.
Authors: Simon Denny; Sue Grant; Ross Galbreath; Jennifer Utter; Theresa Fleming; Terryann Clark Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Casey Regan; Caitlin Fehily; Elizabeth Campbell; Jenny Bowman; Jack Faulkner; Christopher Oldmeadow; Kate Bartlem Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2022-06-27
Authors: Victoria Whitaker; Melissa Oldham; Jennifer Boyd; Hannah Fairbrother; Penny Curtis; Petra Meier; John Holmes Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Caroline Wright; Jon Heron; Ruth Kipping; Matthew Hickman; Rona Campbell; Richard M Martin Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-04-07 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Fiona V Rossen; Terryann Clark; Simon J Denny; Theresa M Fleming; Roshini Peiris-John; Elizabeth Robinson; Mathijs F G Lucassen Journal: Int J Ment Health Addict Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 3.836