| Literature DB >> 24251108 |
Myung-Hee Kim1, Shunya Sato, Kentaro Sasaki, Wataru Saburi, Hirokazu Matsui, Ryozo Imai.
Abstract
Cold shock proteins (CSPs) of bacteria are produced in response to cold and function as RNA chaperones that are essential for cold adaptation. Arabidopsis thaliana COLD SHOCK DOMAIN PROTEIN 3 (AtCSP3) shares a domain with bacterial CSPs and is involved in acquisition of freezing tolerance. Our previous study revealed that many of the genes that are down regulated in an AtCSP3 knockout mutant (atcsp3-2) are functionally associated with responses to salt and drought as well as cold. Here, we examined the involvement of AtCSP3 in salt and drought stress tolerance. We found that AtCSP3 is induced during salt and drought stresses, and is regulated by ABA. A knockout mutant of AtCSP3 (atcsp3-2) showed lower survival rates after salt and drought stress treatments. Conversely, the AtCSP3-overexpressing plants displayed higher survival rates after treatment with these stresses. Most of the genes that were down regulated in the atcsp3-2 mutant were found to be inducible upon salt and drought stresses, and upregulated in the AtCSP3-overexpressors. Together, our data demonstrates that AtCSP3 is involved in the regulation of salt and drought stress tolerance in Arabidopsis.Entities:
Keywords: ABA; ABA, abscisic acid; Arabidopsis thaliana; CBF, C-repeat binding factors; COR, cold-regulated; CSD, cold shock domain; CSPs, cold shock domain proteins; Cold shock domain protein; Drought stress; RNA chaperone; RNP, ribonucleoprotein; Salt stress; mRNP, messenger ribonucleoprotein
Year: 2013 PMID: 24251108 PMCID: PMC3829988 DOI: 10.1016/j.fob.2013.10.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEBS Open Bio ISSN: 2211-5463 Impact factor: 2.693
Fig. 1Expression of AtCSP3 in response to salt, drought, and ABA. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was performed with RNA from 10-d-old seedlings treated with salt (200 mM NaCl) (A), drought (B), or ABA (100 μM) (C). The ACTIN2 gene was amplified as a control.
Fig. 2Response of the atcsp3–2 mutant to salt or drought stress. (A) Phenotype of atcsp3–2 on high-salt medium (200 mM NaCl). Seven-d-old wild type and mutant seedlings grown on MS agar medium were transferred to MS medium supplemented with 200 mM NaCl. The photograph was taken after 3 d of salt treatment. (B) Survival rates were calculated from three independent experiments (n = 25) and are expressed as the means ± SE. (C) Phenotype of atcsp3–2 mutants after re-watering subsequent to drought stress induced by withholding water for 5 d. The photographs were taken 1 d after re-watering. Note that pots were rearranged to better show the differences between genotypes. Survivors are surrounded by lines. (D) Survival rates were calculated from three independent experiments (n = 48). Data represent the means ± SE. Asterisks in (B) and (D) indicate significantly lower survival rates than wild-type (WT) plants as determined by Student's t test (**P < 0.01).
Fig. 3Salt tolerance of AtCSP3 overexpressors. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR (A) and immunoblot analysis (B) of AtCSP3 expression in 10-d-old seedlings. Three independent transgenic lines (S3–3, S3–29, and S3–31) were analyzed. (C) Phenotype of AtCSP3-overexpressing transgenic plants on high-salt medium (200 mM NaCl). The photograph was taken after 6 d of salt treatment. (D) Survival rates were calculated from three independent experiments (n = 25). Data represent the means ± SE. (E) Root growth of AtCSP3 transgenic plants in response to salt treatment (125 mM NaCl). The picture was taken 7 d after transfer to salt-supplemented medium. (F) Relative root length to plants without the salt stress was calculated from three independent experiments (n = 5). The data represent the means ± SE. Asterisks in (D) and (F) indicate significantly higher survival rates than wild-type (WT) plants as determined by Student's t test (**P < 0.01).
Fig. 4Drought tolerance of AtCSP3-overexpression lines. (A) Phenotype of AtCSP3-overexpressing plants after re-watering. Plants were grown in separate pots (one plant per pot) and drought-stressed by withholding water for 10 d. The photograph was taken 1 d after re-watering. Note that pots were rearranged to better show the differences between genotypes. Survivors are surrounded by lines. (B) Survival rates and standard deviations were calculated from three independent experiments (n = 48). Asterisks indicate significantly higher survival compared to wild-type (WT) as determined by Student's t test (**P < 0.01).
Fig. 5Expressions of salt and drought stress-responsive genes in AtCSP3-overexpression lines. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was performed with total RNA from 10-d-old seedlings grown on agar plates treated with 200 mM NaCl (A) or subject to drought (B) for 0, 12, and 24 h. (C) Stress-responsive marker gene expression in three independent 35S:CSP3 lines (S3–3, 29, and 31) and wild-type. Gene-specific primers for PEROXIDASE62 (At5g39580), NRT2.1 (NITRATE TRANSPORTER 2; At1g08090), CYP81F2 (CYTOCHROME P450 FAMILY 81 SUBFAMILY F POLYPEPTIDE 2; At5g57220), GSTF6 (GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASE; At1g02930), DC1 (DC1 DOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN 1; At5g40590), and WRKY18 (WRKY TRANSCRIPTIONAL FACTOR 18; At4g31800) were described in Kim et al. [11]. Primers for DIN2 (DARK INDUCIBLE 2; At3g60140), GSTF7 (GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASE 7; At1g02920), EXL1 (EXORDIUM-LIKE 1; At1g35140), ASN1 (GLUTAMINE-DEPENDENT ASPARAGINE SYNTHASE 1; At3g47340), FLOT1 (FLOTILLIN 1; At5g25250), XTH22 (XYLOGLUCAN ENDOTRANSGLUCOSYLASE 22; At5g57560), LRR-RLK (PUTATIVE LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE; At2g34930), ACS11 (1-AMINOCYCLOPROPANE-1-CARBOXYLATE SYNTHASE 11; At4g08040), At1g19020 (unknown protein), and DIC2 (DICARBOXYLATE CARRIER 2; At4g24570) were described in Supplementary Table S1. The ACTIN2 gene was amplified as a control.