| Literature DB >> 24250618 |
Hossein Ashraf1, Reza Heidari, Vahid Nejati, Minoo Ilkhanipoor.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a common endocrine disorder. Anti-diabetic agents from natural and synthetic sources are available for the treatment of this disease. Berberis integerrima is a medicinal shrub used in conventional therapy for a number of diseases. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of aqueous extract of Berberis integerrima root (AEBI) on some physiological parameters in normal and streptozotocin-induced (STZ-induced) diabetic male Wistar rats. STZ-induced diabetic rats showed significant increases in the levels of blood glucose, triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C), creatinine (Cr), urea, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), total bilirubin while body weight, high density lipoprotein HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C) and total protein levels were significantly decreased compared to normal rats. Treatment of diabetic rats with different doses of aqueous extract of Berberis integerrima root (250 and 500 mg/Kg bw) resulted in a significant decrease in blood glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, ALT, AST, ALP, total bilirubin, creatinine and urea while HDL-cholesterol and total protein levels were markedly increased after six weeks compared to untreated diabetic rats. The effects of the AEBI at dose of 500 mg/Kg in all parameters except blood glucose (similar) is more than to the standard drug, glibenclamide (0.6 mg/Kg, p.o.). The results of this study indicate that the tested aqueous extract of Berberis integerrima root possesses hypoglycemic, hypolipidemic and antioxidant effects in STZ-induced diabetic rats.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Berberis Integerrima; Hypoglycemic; Hypolipidemic; Streptozotocin
Year: 2013 PMID: 24250618 PMCID: PMC3813236
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Effect of glibenclamide and AEBI on the blood glucose in normal and diabetic rats
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | N+C | 10 mL/Kg | 89.40 ± 5.98 | 89.20 ± 4.50 | 98.20 ± 4.52 | 93.80 ± 3.35 |
| 2 | N+AEBI | 250 | 89.00 ± 4.04 | 69.00 ± 4.04b | 77.40 ± 3.24a | 86.40 ± 3.31 |
| 3 | N+AEBI | 500 | 97.40 ± 2.48 | 61.60 ± 2.60b** | 82.20 ± 3.03 | 94.00 ± 2.40 |
| 4 | N+G | 0.6 | 89.20 ± 5.57 | 67.20 ± 3.02b* | 81.60 ± 4.44 | 90.80 ± 5.34 |
| 5 | D+C | 10 mL/Kg | 89.40 ± 4.73 | 316.00 ± 2.16#** | 327.00 ± 3.92#** | 337.20 ± 7.53#** |
| 6 | D+AEBI | 250 | 97.20 ± 3.13 | 220.60 ± 3.09d** | 175.4 ± 5.50d** | 162.40 ± 2.61d** |
| 7 | D+AEBI | 500 | 89.80 ± 4.27 | 181.80 ± 2.26d** | 145.20 ± 2.74d** | 110.40 ± .92d |
| 8 | D+G | 0.6 | 87.20 ± 6.41 | 186.40 ± 2.37d** | 147.40 ± 3.60d** | 113.00 ± 3.43d** |
AEBI: Aqueous extract of Berberis integerrima; N: normal; C: control; G: glibenclamide; D: diabetic; Values are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 6 in each group. One way ANOVA followed by Tukey test. a p < 0.05 and bp < 0.01. Normal treated rats were compared with Normal control Rats. #p < 0.01 Diabetic control Rats were compared with Normal control Rats. cp < 0.05 and dp < 0.01 Diabetic treated rats were compared with Diabetic control rats on corresponding day;*p < 0.05 and**p < 0.01 compared to 0 value
Effect of glibenclamide and AEBI on body weight in normal and diabetic rats
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | N+C | 10 mL/Kg | 193.20 ± 6.58 | 211.56 ± 4.74 | 233.34 ± 3.20** | 247.62 ± 1.87** |
| 2 | N+AEBI | 250 | 204.08 ± 6.03 | 216.28 ± 5.22 | 226.90 ± 4.78 | 236.78 ± 3.58** |
| 3 | N+AEBI | 500 | 200.94 ± 3.47 | 210.20 ± 2.91 | 219.76 ± 3.34 | 236.86 ± 3.18** |
| 4 | N+G | 0.6 | 197.86 ± 6.20 | 212.32 ± 4.41 | 223.64 ± 4.02* | 238.80 ± 2.41** |
| 5 | D+C | 10 mL/Kg | 206.84 ± 3.35 | 155.28 ± 4.97#** | 144.90 ± 2.01#** | 137.98 ± 2.24#** |
| 6 | D+AEBI | 250 | 195.04 ± 4.67 | 183.44 ± 2.88d | 180.96 ± 3.74d | 187.56 ± 3.73d |
| 7 | D+AEBI | 500 | 194.36 ± 1.78 | 181.90 ± 1.62d | 183.52 ± 5.97d | 200.22 ± 2.78d |
| 8 | D+G | 0.6 | 199.94 ± 1.72 | 184.30 ± 4.08d | 193.46 ± 5.53d | 203.52 ± 5.61d |
AEBI: Aqueous extract of Berberis integerrima; N: normal; C: control; G: glibenclamide; D: diabetic; Values are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 6 in each group. One way ANOVA followed by Tukey test. a p < 0.05 and bp < 0.01 Normal treated rats were compared with Normal control rats. #p < 0.01 Diabetic control rats were compared with Normal control Rats. cp < 0.05 and dp < 0.01 Diabetic treated rats were compared with Diabetic control Rats on corresponding day;*p < 0.05 and**p < 0.01 compared to 0 value
Effect of glibenclamide and AEBI on the lipid profiles (mg/dL) in normal and diabetic rats.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | N+C | 10 mL/Kg | 76.28 ± .98 | 66.42 ± 1.03 | 38.54 ± .48 | 24.25 ± 1.21 |
| 2 | N+AEBI | 250 | 74.40 ± .85 | 64.66 ± 1.79 | 39.95 ± .52 | 21.66 ± .93 |
| 3 | N+AEBI | 500 | 72.70 ± .54 | 60.96 ± .84 | 40.82 ± .61 | 19.68 ± .91 |
| 4 | N+G | 0.6 | 72.68 ± 1.02 | 64.26 ± .70 | 39.80 ± .74 | 19.58 ± 1.76 |
| 5 | D+C | 10 mL/Kg | 125.94 ± 1.67# | 121.68 ± .90# | 14.46 ± .32# | 87.14 ± 1.63# |
| 6 | D+AEBI | 250 | 76.60 ± 1.55d | 85.26 ± 1.87d | 33.08 ± .76d | 26.46 ± 1.26d |
| 7 | D+AEBI | 500 | 69.48 ± 2.04ad | 73.84 ± 1.87d | 37.30 ± .65d | 17.41 ± 1.73d |
| 8 | D+G | 0.6 | 97.70 ± 2.49bd | 81.53 ± .94d | 35.20 ± .56d | 46.18 ± 2.67d |
AEBI: Aqueous Extract of Berberis Integerrima; N: normal; C: control; G: glibenclamide; D: diabetic; Values are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 6 in each group. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey test. a p < 0.05 and bp < 0.01. Normal treated rats were compared with Normal control rats. #p < 0.01; Diabetic control rats were compared with Normal control rats. cp < 0.05 and dp < 0.01; Diabetic treated rats were compared with Diabetic control rats.
Effect of glibenclamide and AEBI on the liver parameters (mg/dL) in normal and diabetic rats.
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | N+C | 10 mL/Kg | 93.82 ± 4.76 | 25.84 ± 1.60 | 21.00 ± 1.57 | 0.83 ± .04 | 2.06.08 |
| 2 | N+AEBI | 250 | 85.62 ± 4.15 | 23.28 ± 1.83 | 20.02 ± 099 | 0.74 ± .02 | 2.14 ± .22 |
| 3 | N+AEBI | 500 | 82.80 ± 1.59 | 21.10 ± 1.78 | 17.56 ± .99 | 0.76 ± .03 | 2.30 ± .23 |
| 4 | N+G | 0.6 | 84.06 ± 2.28 | 22.42 ± 2.08 | 19.10 ± .88 | 0.76 ± .03 | 2.17 ± .12 |
| 5 | D+C | 10 mL/Kg | 180.78 ± 3.25# | 48.92 ± 1.96# | 44.68 ± 2.35# | 1.39 ± .06# | 0.49 ± .05# |
| 6 | D+AEBI | 250 | 147.34 ± 4.56d | 36.06 ± 1.89d | 25.68 ± 1.79d | 1.03 ± .07d | 1.15 ± .05c |
| 7 | D+AEBI | 500 | 101.56 ± 7.79d | 24.28 ± 1.74d | 22.02 ± 1.56d | 0.82 ± .05d | 1.80 ± .10d |
| 8 | D+G | 0.6 | 112.94 ± 5.48d | 28.06 ± 1.48d | 22.20 ± .65d | 0.97 ± .09d | 1.12 ± .08c |
AEBI: Aqueous Extract of Berberis Integerrima; N: normal; C: control; G: glibenclamide; D: diabetic; Values are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 6 in each group. One way ANOVA followed by Tukey test. a p < 0.05 and bp < 0.01; Normal treated rats were compared with Normal control rats. #p < 0.01; Diabetic control rats were compared with Normal control rats. cp < 0.05 and dp < 0.01; Diabetic treated rats were compared with diabetic control rats
Effects of glibenclamide and AEBI on kidney parameters (mg/dL) in normal and diabetic rats
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| 1 | N+C | 10 mL/Kg | 0.66 ± .02 | 19.58 ± 1.24 |
| 2 | N+AEBI | 250 | 0.64 ± .02 | 18.20 ± 1.08 |
| 3 | N+AEBI | 500 | 0.61 ± .00 | 17.80 ± 1.37 |
| 4 | N+G | 0.6 | 0.63 ± .01 | 18.68±1.54 |
| 5 | D+C | 10 mL/Kg | 1.70 ± .10# | 69.70±1.83# |
| 6 | D+AEBI | 250 | 1.00 ± .13d | 31.46±2.45d |
| 7 | D+AEBI | 500 | 0.80 ± .14d | 24.00±1.43d |
| 8 | D+G | 0.6 | 0.93 ± .06d | 26.30±1.36d |
AEBI: Aqueous Extract of Berberis Integerrima; N: normal; C: control; G: glibenclamide; D: diabetic; Values are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 6 in each group. One way ANOVA followed by Tukey test. a: p < 0.05 and b: p < 0.01 Normal treated rats were compared with Normal control rats. #p < 0.01; Diabetic control rats were compared with Normal control rats. c: p < 0.05 and d: p < 0.01; Diabetic treated rats were compared with Diabetic control rats