Literature DB >> 24249665

How many different types of femora are there in primary hip osteoarthritis? An active shape modeling study.

C Merle1, W Waldstein, J S Gregory, S R Goodyear, R M Aspden, P R Aldinger, D W Murray, H S Gill.   

Abstract

We assessed the variation in proximal femoral canal shape and its association with geometric and demographic parameters in primary hip OA. In a retrospective cohort study, the joint geometry of the proximal femur was evaluated on radiographs and corresponding CT scans of 345 consecutive patients with end-stage hip OA. Active shape modeling (ASM) was performed to assess the variation in endosteal shape of the proximal femur. To identify natural groupings of patients, hierarchical cluster analysis of the shape modes was used. ASM identified 10 independent shape modes accounting for >96% of the variation in proximal femoral canal shape within the dataset. Cluster analysis revealed 10 specific shape clusters. Significant differences in geometric and demographic parameters between the clusters were observed. ASM and subsequent cluster analysis have the potential to identify specific morphological patterns of the proximal femur despite the variability in proximal femoral anatomy. The study identified patterns of proximal femoral canal shape in hip OA that allow a comprehensive classification of variation in shape and its association with joint geometry. Our data may improve future stem designs that will optimize stem fit and simultaneously allow individual restoration of hip biomechanics.
© 2013 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy; arthroplasty; hip; osteoarthritis; shape modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24249665     DOI: 10.1002/jor.22518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  5 in total

1.  The tridimensional geometry of the proximal femur should determine the design of cementless femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Julien Wegrzyn; Jean-Paul Roux; Charlotte Loriau; Nicolas Bonin; Vincent Pibarot
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Clinical phenotypes based on clinical prognostic factors in patients with secondary hip osteoarthritis: preliminary findings from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hiroshige Tateuchi; Haruhiko Akiyama; Koji Goto; Kazutaka So; Yutaka Kuroda; Noriaki Ichihashi
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  [What are the benefits of patient-specific reconstruction in total hip replacement?]

Authors:  Christian Merle; Moritz M Innmann; Fabian Westhauser; Patrick Sadoghi; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Primary rotational stability of various megaprostheses in a biomechanical sawbone model with proximal femoral defects extending to the isthmus.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Jan Nadorf; Jan Dennis Graage; Eike Jakubowitz; Jan Philippe Kretzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Automated assessment of bone changes in cross-sectional micro-CT studies of murine experimental osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Patricia Das Neves Borges; Tonia L Vincent; Massimo Marenzana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.