BACKGROUND: Patients with unresectable melanoma or sarcoma hepatic metastasis have a poor prognosis with few therapeutic options. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP), isolating and perfusing the liver with chemotherapy, provides a promising minimally invasive management option. We reviewed our institutional experience with PHP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with unresectable melanoma or sarcoma hepatic metastasis treated with PHP from 2008 to 2013 and evaluated therapeutic response, morbidity, hepatic progression free survival (hPFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Ten patients were treated with 27 PHPs (median 3). Diagnoses were ocular melanoma (n = 5), cutaneous melanoma (n = 3), unknown primary melanoma (n = 1), and sarcoma (n = 1). Median hPFS was 240 days, 9 of 10 patients (90%) demonstrated stable disease or partial response to treatment. At a median follow up of 11.5 months, 4 of 10 (40%) remain alive. There were no perioperative mortalities. Myelosuppresion was the most common morbidity, managed on an outpatient basis with growth factors. The median hospital stay was 3 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with metastatic melanoma and sarcoma to the liver have limited treatment options. Our experience with PHP demonstrates promising results with minimal morbidity and should be considered (pending FDA approval) as a management option for unresectable melanoma or sarcoma hepatic metastasis.
BACKGROUND:Patients with unresectable melanoma or sarcoma hepatic metastasis have a poor prognosis with few therapeutic options. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP), isolating and perfusing the liver with chemotherapy, provides a promising minimally invasive management option. We reviewed our institutional experience with PHP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with unresectable melanoma or sarcoma hepatic metastasis treated with PHP from 2008 to 2013 and evaluated therapeutic response, morbidity, hepatic progression free survival (hPFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Ten patients were treated with 27 PHPs (median 3). Diagnoses were ocular melanoma (n = 5), cutaneous melanoma (n = 3), unknown primary melanoma (n = 1), and sarcoma (n = 1). Median hPFS was 240 days, 9 of 10 patients (90%) demonstrated stable disease or partial response to treatment. At a median follow up of 11.5 months, 4 of 10 (40%) remain alive. There were no perioperative mortalities. Myelosuppresion was the most common morbidity, managed on an outpatient basis with growth factors. The median hospital stay was 3 days. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with metastatic melanoma and sarcoma to the liver have limited treatment options. Our experience with PHP demonstrates promising results with minimal morbidity and should be considered (pending FDA approval) as a management option for unresectable melanoma or sarcoma hepatic metastasis.
Authors: H R Alexander; S K Libutti; D L Bartlett; M Puhlmann; D L Fraker; L C Bachenheimer Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: M V Beheshti; D F Denny; M G Glickman; W Bodden; J C Marsh; R Strair; T S Ravikumar Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 1992-08 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: H Richard Alexander; Steven K Libutti; James F Pingpank; Seth M Steinberg; David L Bartlett; Cynthia Helsabeck; Tatiana Beresneva Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Andrea M Abbott; Matthew P Doepker; Youngchul Kim; Matthew C Perez; Cassandra Gandle; Kerry L Thomas; Junsung Choi; Ravi Shridhar; Jonathan S Zager Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Marybeth S Hughes; Jonathan Zager; Mark Faries; H Richard Alexander; Richard E Royal; Bradford Wood; Junsung Choi; Kevin McCluskey; Eric Whitman; Sanjiv Agarwala; Gary Siskin; Charles Nutting; Mary Ann Toomey; Carole Webb; Tatiana Beresnev; James F Pingpank Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-11-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Eleonora M de Leede; Mark C Burgmans; Christian H Martini; Fred G J Tijl; Arian R van Erkel; Jaap Vuyk; Ellen Kapiteijn; Cornelis Verhoef; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Alexander L Vahrmeijer Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2016-07-31 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Steffen Marquardt; Martha M Kirstein; Roland Brüning; Martin Zeile; Pier Francesco Ferrucci; Warner Prevoo; Boris Radeleff; Hervé Trillaud; Lambros Tselikas; Emilio Vicente; Philipp Wiggermann; Michael P Manns; Arndt Vogel; Frank K Wacker Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: T Susanna Meijer; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Christian H Martini; Fred G J Tijl; M Elske Sitsen; Arian R van Erkel; Rutger W van der Meer; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Mark C Burgmans Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.630
Authors: Mark C Burgmans; Eleonora M de Leede; Christian H Martini; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Arian R van Erkel Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Eleonora M de Leede; Mark C Burgmans; T Susanna Meijer; Christian H Martini; Fred G J Tijl; Jaap Vuyk; Arian R van Erkel; Cornelis J H van der Velde; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 2.740