BACKGROUND: Increasing the drug concentration in tumors may produce massive tumoral response. By using a variety of hepatic vascular isolation techniques, high concentrations of chemotherapeutic drugs may be achieved in the hepatic vascular bed. HYPOTHESIS: Complete percutaneous isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) is feasible and safe. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: The hepatobiliary unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Ten patients with irresectable and chemoresistant hepatic tumors were eligible for study participation; 4 patients with hepatic metastases of breast cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and cholangiocarcinoma were included. INTERVENTION: Patients received 3 successive courses of chemotherapy by IHP. The first course was given at laparotomy, and the next 2 courses were given percutaneously. The interval between courses was 3 to 6 weeks. Each course involved IHP of the liver for 15 to 30 minutes, without oxygenation, with 1 to 3 boluses of melphalan (15 mg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Ten IHPs were performed (4 at laparotomy and 6 percutaneously). Concentrations of melphalan in the extracorporeal circulation were 10 times higher than those in the systemic circulation. Percutaneous IHPs had more leakage than those at laparotomy. However, hepatotoxicity was minimized. One patient experienced hepatic artery thrombosis, and 3 had severe neutropenia. Minor complications included ascites and pleural effusion. No deaths were observed 2 months after the last IHP. One partial response was observed (hepatic metastases of breast cancer). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous IHP for intensive chemotherapy is less aggressive and less hepatotoxic than IHP at laparotomy and may be iterative.
BACKGROUND: Increasing the drug concentration in tumors may produce massive tumoral response. By using a variety of hepatic vascular isolation techniques, high concentrations of chemotherapeutic drugs may be achieved in the hepatic vascular bed. HYPOTHESIS: Complete percutaneous isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) is feasible and safe. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: The hepatobiliary unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Ten patients with irresectable and chemoresistant hepatic tumors were eligible for study participation; 4 patients with hepatic metastases of breast cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and cholangiocarcinoma were included. INTERVENTION: Patients received 3 successive courses of chemotherapy by IHP. The first course was given at laparotomy, and the next 2 courses were given percutaneously. The interval between courses was 3 to 6 weeks. Each course involved IHP of the liver for 15 to 30 minutes, without oxygenation, with 1 to 3 boluses of melphalan (15 mg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Ten IHPs were performed (4 at laparotomy and 6 percutaneously). Concentrations of melphalan in the extracorporeal circulation were 10 times higher than those in the systemic circulation. Percutaneous IHPs had more leakage than those at laparotomy. However, hepatotoxicity was minimized. One patient experienced hepatic artery thrombosis, and 3 had severe neutropenia. Minor complications included ascites and pleural effusion. No deaths were observed 2 months after the last IHP. One partial response was observed (hepatic metastases of breast cancer). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous IHP for intensive chemotherapy is less aggressive and less hepatotoxic than IHP at laparotomy and may be iterative.
Authors: Geert Maleux; Diethard Monbaliu; Chris Verslype; Christophe Casteleyn; Marc Van De Velde; Pieter Cornillie; Yvonne Hoogeveen; Eric Van Cutsem Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-05-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Meghan R Forster; Omar M Rashid; Matthew C Perez; Junsung Choi; Tariq Chaudhry; Jonathan S Zager Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Mark C Burgmans; Eleonora M de Leede; Christian H Martini; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Arian R van Erkel Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2015-12-30 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Eleonora M de Leede; Mark C Burgmans; T Susanna Meijer; Christian H Martini; Fred G J Tijl; Jaap Vuyk; Arian R van Erkel; Cornelis J H van der Velde; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2017-04-27 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: T Susanna Meijer; Jan H N Dieters; Eleonora M de Leede; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Jaap Vuijk; Christian H Martini; Arian R van Erkel; Jacob Lutjeboer; Rutger W van der Meer; Fred G J Tijl; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Mark C Burgmans Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: T Susanna Meijer; Mark C Burgmans; Eleonora M de Leede; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Bas Boekestijn; Henricus J M Handgraaf; Denise E Hilling; Jacob Lutjeboer; Jaap Vuijk; Christian H Martini; Arian R van Erkel; Rutger W van der Meer; Fred G J Tijl; Frank M Speetjens; Ellen Kapiteijn; Alexander L Vahrmeijer Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 5.344