Literature DB >> 24249246

Assessment of treatment efficacy and sebosuppressive effect of fractional radiofrequency microneedle on acne vulgaris.

Kyung Real Lee1, Eo Gin Lee, Hee Jung Lee, Moon Soo Yoon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: A minimally invasive fractional radiofrequency microneedle (FRM) device has been used in skin rejuvenation and acne scars, and a recent pilot study demonstrated the positive therapeutic effect on acne. We evaluated the efficacy of FRM device for acne vulgaris in Asians and conducted objective measurement to assess its effect on sebum production. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty Korean patients with acne vulgaris received a single full-face FRM treatment. Outcome assessments included standardized photography, physician's global assessment, patient's satisfaction scores, acne lesion count, and objective measurements of casual sebum level (CSL) and sebum excretion rate (SER). They were evaluated at baseline and 2, 4, 8 weeks after the treatment.
RESULTS: After a single FRM treatment, the CSL and the SER showed 30-60% and 70-80% reduction, respectively, at week 2 (P < 0.01), and remained below the baseline level until week 8. Physician's global improvement scores for acne severity and acne lesion count also revealed clinical improvement with maximum efficacy at week 2, but returned to the baseline in most patients by week 8. Patients' satisfaction scores (0-4) were above 2 on average, and adverse effects were minimal.
CONCLUSION: This prospective study demonstrated the sebosuppressive effect from a single FRM treatment, but its therapeutic efficacy in acne requires further evaluation.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acne vulgaris; fractional radiofrequency microneedle; sebum excretion

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24249246     DOI: 10.1002/lsm.22200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  5 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review Examining the Potential Adverse Effects of Microneedling.

Authors:  Asha Gowda; Brayden Healey; Harib Ezaldein; Miesha Merati
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2021-01-01

Review 2.  Microneedles in Action: Microneedling and Microneedles-Assisted Transdermal Delivery.

Authors:  Dong-Jin Lim; Hong-Jun Kim
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 3.  Microneedling: Advances and widening horizons.

Authors:  Aashim Singh; Savita Yadav
Journal:  Indian Dermatol Online J       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

4.  Topical Tazarotene Gel, 0.1%, as a Novel Treatment Approach for Atrophic Postacne Scars: A Randomized Active-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  T P Afra; Muhammed Razmi T; Tarun Narang; Sunil Dogra; Ashok Kumar
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

5.  Quantitative assessment of the long-term efficacy and safety of a 1064-nm picosecond laser with fractionated microlens array in the treatment of enlarged pores in Asians: A case-control study.

Authors:  Siriwan Palawisuth; Woraphong Manuskiatti; Chalermkwan Apinuntham; Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha; Kathryn Anne G Cembrano
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2021-07-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.